Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Doesn't Invoking Exec. Priviledge For RNC Emails Essentially Violate The Hatch Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 05:38 PM
Original message
Doesn't Invoking Exec. Priviledge For RNC Emails Essentially Violate The Hatch Act
The RNC is absolutely a political group with its sole purpose being partisan political activity.

Doesn't Bush claiming Executive Priveledge on any of those emails mean he is violating the Hatch Act?


... questions were raised about the legality and appropriateness of Mr. Jennings’s presentation and the discussion that followed it. The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service issued an 11-page report that found that both the presentation itself and Ms. Doan’s comments could be violations of the federal Hatch Act. According to CRS, the White House presentation alone may cross the line into being an impermissible “political activity” under the Hatch Act when “the sponsor or presenter is closely affiliated/identified with a partisan political campaign, invitations are directed only to ‘political’ employees of a department, and the objectives and agenda of the program appear to have a partisan slant.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not sure? Better check with Gonzales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. NO. It is the Presidential Records Act. RNC e-mails were for NOT violating the Hatch Act.
Using the RNC e-mails for USG business would violate the requirement to preserve government business, the Presidential Records Act.

ROVE's PPT violated the Hatch Act, and he is likely resigning to evade the punishment, being pushed out of government service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. It cetainly IMPLIES that the Hatch Act is being violated
Why would the official party organization NEED Executive Privilege?

If we find out that the pResident has indeed extended EP, then HE'S in breach of the Hatch Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetrusMonsFormicarum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have serious doubts
that any judge, liberal or wrong, will allow the RNC to fall under the protective wing of our ratfuck "president".

Somebody at RNC has already destroyed emails and documents, and for that they are going to jail. The cruellest irony, however, is Bush's own desire for legacy, for historical status. His own lackeys are destroying his presidential records!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. I said this last night - the simple existance of official working documents on the RNC servers
Is a violation of the Hatch Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC