Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ALL CHENEY-NO BUSH, When Gonzo Said "At Behest Of President" - He Meant Dick

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 10:44 PM
Original message
ALL CHENEY-NO BUSH, When Gonzo Said "At Behest Of President" - He Meant Dick
Mueller's Chronology
by emptywheel

Did you ever notice that if you take a log recording the events regarding an illegal surveillance program, and redact the heck out of it, it looks like a chronology that a dirty fucking hippy blogger might write? Below you can read what's left of Mueller's log, with my notes. The big takeaways are:

Mueller refers to a "program," singular. Which backs up what everyone has been saying: Gonzales is a lying sack. There was one program that was the subject of a DOJ revolt, not the parsing tidbits of programs Gonzales would like to pretend there were.

All Cheney, no Bush. With the exception of the famous meeting where Mueller met Bush directly, Bush was uninvolved, at least from Mueller's perspective. Cheney, on the other hand, attended all the group meetings (though Card was in charge of twisting Mueller's and Comey's arms). And the final meeting Mueller felt the need to record was one with Cheney. Is there any doubt, then, when Gonzales say "at the behest of the President," he really means, "Dick"?

muchmore at:
http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/2007/08/muellers-chrono.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Never any doubt for me.
He was asked point blank if Cheney ordered him to go and his answer was he went "on behalf of the president." Same question was repeated, same answer of course. And very smugly I might add.

When are they going to remove that little twerp?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Heck, I often wonder why Dick kept the chimp on the ticket
but I guess they had to have a puppet to put forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC