Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm taking bets.. When will CNN implode?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 09:58 AM
Original message
I'm taking bets.. When will CNN implode?
Think about it.. they have

1... a mining bump bounce disaster
2... a hurricane
3... a "royal" wedding
4... Michael Vick
5... Cheney's '94 video tape
6... Shuttle "troubles"
7... Stock Market jitters
8... Housing market collapsing
9... The "found" baby in Baghdad
10. "Arabs" disguising themselves as Mexicans, and sneaking across the border
11. Flooding in Texas
12. O.J.'s book
13. Peru's earthquake


How will they manage if Lindsay Lohan decides to take a drive or if Brittney drops her baby or blows her nose on her sleeve

Oh the agony...
I'm not sure they can handle all the stress..

It's enough to get Anderson Cooper to start pronouncing his "T"s..and to get Kyra all chatty in the bathroom again :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Damn! They're covering 'real' news? Lay low, Lindsay! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. One question My Dear
I agree, they do have a load (so to speak.) But your reference to Cheney's video of 94 intrigues me. I'm in the dark, could you give me a Cliff Notes brief?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here: and FWIW, Tweety played it on air yesterday:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. oooh it's delish
YouTube has it.. He's giving an interview explaining why it's a TERRIBLE idea to go to Baghdad

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. THANKS SoCalDem and Babylon Sister
DU - MY NUMBER ONE SOURCE OF NEWS

YOU GUYS ARE GREAT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. We aim to please.. We do it all for you dahhhlink
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeytherat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Essentially, it's the same thing Poppy Bush said in the late 90s:
Trying to eliminate Saddam, extending the ground war into an occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guideline about not changing objectives in midstream, engaging in "mission creep" and would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible. We had been unable to find Noriega in Panama which we knew intimately. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and other allies pulling out as well. Under those circumstances, there was no viable "exit strategy" we could see, violating another of our principles. Further more, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post-Cold War world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations' mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in bitterly hostile land. It would have been a dramatically different -- and perhaps barren -- outcome.

George H.W. Bush - A World Transformed (Alfred A. Knopf, NY, 1998), page 489


If only there was some way, any way, G.W. could have spoken with his father and his running mate...

mikey_the_rat

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. If Michael Jackson "fathered" another kid..
that would probably put them over the edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. they might have to taser Rick Sanchez again.. just to settle him down
:)

damn .. I lost the video
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. All that REAL news..you know what that means...
There's going to be a NEW LEAD in the NATALIE HOLLOWAY case!! Whoo hoo!:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. Uhh... John Mark Karr now says he DIDN'T lie about JonBenet!

I shit you not. It's on CNN's homepage. Time to pull up the file footage of five year olds in beauty pageants!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. You've gotta be fucking kidding me!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. jessica biel is going to do a nude scene!
nothing else matters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I thought she already did that.. Wasn't that why they kicked her off 7th Heaven?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. yes but this one is going to be more revealing!
stay tuned E will have the full story......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Agnomen Donating Member (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. Any blondes missing?
If there is one, that will be their top, 24/7 story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. These are CNN's golden days.
There are enough tawdry and distracting "stories" to keep them away for weeks from anything significant, anything that has to do with our democracy. They love this. Wolf can stand in the "Situation Room" 24/7 and bleat about this banality or that. He actually needs a Situation Kitchen and a Situation Crapper to keep up with the nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. Either when they actually have to cover real news or when the next white female celeb buys the farm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC