Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Wants More Time on Subpoenas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 08:10 AM
Original message
White House Wants More Time on Subpoenas
By DEB RIECHMANN - Associated Press Writer

CRAWFORD, Texas (AP) -- The White House on Friday asked a Senate panel for more time to produce subpoenaed information about the legal justification for President Bush's secretive eavesdropping program.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy had set Monday as the deadline for administration officials already subpoenaed to provide documents and testimony about the National Security Agency's eavesdropping program.

In a letter to Leahy, White House counsel Fred Fielding argued that the subpoenas called for the production of "extraordinarily sensitive national security information," and he said much of the information - if not all - could be subject to a claim of executive privilege.

Fielding asked Leahy to suspend the deadline until after Labor Day.

On June 27, the committee subpoenaed the Justice Department, National Security Council and the offices of the president and vice president for documents relating to the National Security Agency's legal justification for the wiretapping program. Since then, the issue has been the subject of several letters exchanged between Capitol Hill and the White House.

((((entire article @ link))))

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/W/WHITE_HOUSE_SUBPOENAS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Need more time to clear out everything

They are getting nearer to the Big Mistake!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Looks like they'll need....
Looks like they'll need the same trucks that pulled up next to the Enron building when they were so busy shredding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. We're going to need until at least Jan 21, 2009 to produce that information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think we should be hard about it and at least only give them 1/2 the
time extension, if any. They will end up not producing anything anyway and what do you bet they will be given all the time they ask for by the Dems. However, Leahy has been the best at fighting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's exactly it! It's as obvious as the nose on Pinocchio's face... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Takes a long time to paste back together shredded documents. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC