Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush administration refuses to collect penalties for mine safety violations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 06:06 PM
Original message
Bush administration refuses to collect penalties for mine safety violations
By Samuel Davidson
21 March 2006

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/mar2006/mine-m21.shtml

Flashback to March 2006, skip to paragraphs three through six.

In addition, the Bush administration has stacked MSHA with former coal managers who have unashamedly tailored the agency’s policies to meet the profit needs of the operators. All the while the number of mine inspectors in the field has been cut, those considered too aggressive have been punished and proposals to improve mine safety have been repeatedly delayed or scuttled altogether.

Many of the mines where fatal accidents occurred this year had been repeatedly cited for unsafe conditions, yet federal and state authorities allowed them to continue to operate and only imposed minimal fines on their owners. The Sago Mine in West Virginia, where 12 miners lost their lives after a January 2 explosion, had been cited over 200 times in 2005 alone, including 96 citations categorized as “serious and substantial,” the most severe MSHA violation. Despite this record, the total amount the mine’s owner—International Coal Group—was fined was just over $25,000, or less than $150 per violation.

USA Today noted that of all government agencies MSHA consistently imposed among the lowest fines for violations of its rules. The Federal Communication Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Securities and Exchange Commission can all issue fines of over $1 million for a single violation, the newspaper said. The top fine that MSHA can hand out is only $60,000, and that fine is rarely imposed.

“The federal government levied a larger fine—$550,000—for the 2004 Super Bowl showing of Janet Jackson’s breast than it did for the 2001 deaths of 13 Alabama miners,” stated the February 11 article. The newspaper also noted “the $435,000 fine against mine operator Jim Walter Resources was cut by a judge to $3,000.”


We must fight the nipples over there??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Kinda makes one wonder
if Sago didn't bring together some brainstorming to find a scapegoat better that lightning as a cause for their disasters.

I grew up in WVA and we all have relatives in the mines dealing with the threat daily, what we don't expect is a total abandonment of responsibility and accountability of he owners, operators and regulators. The latter of which are drawing a paycheck for the express purpose of making sure shit like this doesn't happen. One more example of Republicans making sure the masses see the government as a waste of money.

They will gladly drown all of us in the tub and throw us in a mass grave to make room for that final drowning they salivate for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Also another example of 'hiring' sycophants who know not what they're
doing, obviously, and as you pointed out, no one seems to care. I hope more attention is focused on this travesty come September. It's unconscionable that the miners are used and abused the way they have been, as if their lives have no meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why would they charge one corporatist so much
for showing a nipple?

But another gets a wrist slap fine?

Hmm. Could it be that it artificially inflates the costs of the telecommunications sector? Gotta keep that media out of the hands of poor folk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Exercising control,
in the only way they they know how.

When all you have is a hammer, all you problems have to become nails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Damn...not surprising
the outrages continue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Solly Mack
please, tell me just what the hell that banana man is up to, he is beginning to freak me out a tad.:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He's a rock star boozing it up and being naughty
but for some reason I just like him...and he's really not likable

He's lounging there, plotting the death of a boy band ...made up of cherries

I know...I know...

Sorry :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. like killing miners by dangerious "Depillarisation" that caused the latest cave in's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC