Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUSH Blames His Own Country For The Cambodian Genocide.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 08:59 PM
Original message
BUSH Blames His Own Country For The Cambodian Genocide.
Pol Pot R Us

by digby

And here I thought it was the liberals who were the blame American firsters.


Mr Bush spoke of the massacres under Cambodia's Khmer Rouge,"The defence strategy that refused to hand the South Koreans over to a totalitarian neighbour helped raise up an Asian Tiger that is a model for developing countries across the world, including the Middle East."

Mr Bush compared current calls for withdrawal from Iraq with what happened at the end of the Vietnam War in 1975.

"Many argued that if we pulled out, there would be no consequences for the Vietnamese people," Mr Bush said. "The world would learn just how costly these misimpressions would be.

"Three decades later, there is a legitimate debate about how we got into the Vietnam War and how we left.

"Whatever your position in that debate, one unmistakable legacy of Vietnam is that the price of America's withdrawal was paid by millions of innocent citizens," Mr Bush said, mentioning reprisals against US allies in Vietnam, the displacement of Vietnamese refugees and the massacres in Cambodia under Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6958824.stm


This is truly amazing. The president of the United States is actually blaming his own country for the Cambodian genocide. Even Normon Podhoretz and his creature Rudy Giuliani haven't had the nerve to make that argument. Old Norm was adamant that the Vietnam Syndrome had helped turn the US into a bunch of wimps, but he didn't actually blame the US for Pol Pot.

For the record, as I'm sure everyone knows, Pol Pot's rise was enabled by the US's war policies not by its withdrawal and it was the newly minted commies who ended the genocide so Bush is, as usual, talking gibberish.

more at:
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/pol-pot-r-us-by-digby-and-here-i.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mr_hat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's not blaming his own country. He's blaming Dems
and the press and all the other peace-wimps. This isn't anything new to the loony right - they've bemoaned for years the deaths the left supposedly caused.

Humanitarians that they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. HL Mencken was right.
"As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's my sig!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Pol Pot R Us" - I love her! But as another poster said, this is about Dems
as witnessed by the rethug attack machine orchestrated by Fleisher. I wonder how long it took them to find people to play into those ads, or how much it cost? $15M was spent to 'sway' anyone on the cusp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nixon pulled out of Vietnam, not the Democrats
And he did so over a 4 and a half year timeline. The Democrats did not "cut" funding for the war until all US combat troops were out and Nixon and Ford were begging for more financial military aid to the South Vietnamese in 1974-75. At that point, the jig was up for South Vietnam anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. And let's not forget, this propaganda was "catapulted" by the departing Turd Blossom:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0807/5392.html
WACO, Texas — A day after announcing he will leave government Aug. 31, an unrepentant Karl Rove said Tuesday that Democrats are headed toward repeating Vietnam-era mistakes that gave Republicans the upper hand on national defense for 30 years
*****
ongressional efforts to oppose President Bush’s “surge” strategy have clear echoes of Democrats in the early 1970s who cut off support for U.S. military involvement in Vietnam, a war that was even more unpopular than Iraq. In Rove’s view, the nation wound up with its prestige diminished and its adversaries emboldened.

So, Nixon listened to democrats, and carter, Clinton's presidencies never happened...
Anyway, my point was, the turd still puts words in W's mouth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush was speaking to his base today, they're too dumb to know that.
Edited on Wed Aug-22-07 09:12 PM by sparosnare
Anyone with a knowledge of history and a brain knows that speech was completely ridiculous. It was directed at those among us who will support Bush no matter what he pulls out of his ass. Mind-numbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I heard outtakes of the speech on my way home from SSU...
Edited on Wed Aug-22-07 09:22 PM by adsosletter
...the idea of comparing the occupation of Iraq with the occupation of Japan or Germany after WWII...I thought my eyeballs were gonna' pop out of my head...has this man ever actually read a history book?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. If he thought it was such a terrible thing
he should have been there instead of falling on the floor drunk. I suppose next he will blame the liberals for that too, he would have gone if only the war hadn't ended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. He should have fought in that war then, not spent it defending Dallas from a Viet Cong Invasion
That is when he bothered to show up for duty of course. He disgusts me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC