Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court will reconsider its ruling on detainee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 07:34 AM
Original message
Court will reconsider its ruling on detainee
Court will reconsider its ruling on detainee

Associated Press
RICHMOND, Va. - A federal appeals court will reconsider its ruling that a legal U.S. resident being held as a suspected enemy combatant should be charged or released from military custody.
A three-judge panel of the court ruled 2-1 in June that the Military Commissions Act, passed in 2006 to establish military trials, does not strip Ali al-Marri of his constitutional right to challenge his accusers in court.

The Bush administration requested a rehearing by the full court, arguing that national security would be jeopardized if the administration was not allowed to indefinitely hold suspected terrorists as enemy combatants inside the United States.

The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted the rehearing in a brief order Wednesday. Arguments will be held the week of Oct. 31, and the court's decision likely will come a few weeks later.

more at:
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/nation_world/20070824_Court_will_reconsider_its_ruling_on_detainee.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. The constitution puts national security in jeopardy.
The president must be able to completely disregard the constitution. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Stupid constitution emboldens terrarisss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ah, who needs habeas anyway?
If the government thinks you did something wrong, isn't that enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. "enemy combatant" is a made up undefined term and uncodified term
and thus should have no legal standing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC