Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When it Comes to Protecting Pervs, Congress is More Powerful Than God

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 09:56 AM
Original message
When it Comes to Protecting Pervs, Congress is More Powerful Than God
Heather Wood Thu Aug 23, 11:10 PM ET

It must really be nice to live under such a thick veil of protection and secrecy that you can conduct yourself like a complete sleaze bag without repercussions. The veil of which I speak is, of course, our government. This week as Florida police officers tried to look for, you know, evidence, in their investigation of former U.S. Rep. Mark Foley - who in Sept. 2006 resigned from Congress after being accused of soliciting and sending sexually explicit emails and instant messages to teenage boys - they were stopped cold by Congress. Sorry, said Uncle Sam, but you can't snoop around these parts, criminal investigation or no. Something about "case laws," which is just legal jargon for: Ha ha, there's a precedent-setting case that's stopping you, so there!

Apparently, no matter what one of our elected public officials is doing on their state-issued computers, it's off limits to the public, and certainly the police. Considering Foley spent most of his time at the office, and was allegedly in contact with former Congressional pages (who, if by the time they became "former" were still teens, then Capitol Hill needs to seriously rethink its internship policies) chances are the burden of proof lies in that very computer. Geez, talk about blanket protection. When Catholic priests were being accused of all those horrible, illegal, immoral acts, the law of the Lord protected them for awhile, but eventually the truth - and consequences - came out.

Why does Foley get to jump through loopholes that allow him to escape federal pornography laws - and who knows what else. Now, I'm not accusing the man of the worst things the priests were guilty of, but the last time I checked, partaking in salacious conversations with minors got you arrested, or at least outed and humiliated on the evening news.

And if these ridiculous, elitist protections weren't bad enough, old Foley is resorting to the go-to damage control of public people: He checked himself in to rehab for "alcoholism and other behavioral problems," admitted he was gay and confessed to being molested by a priest as a teenage altar boy in Florida. Damn, another low-blow to the Big Guy.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20070824/cm_huffpost/061629
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcruse42 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think Heather's having an Emily Latilla moment.
"What's all this I hear about Congress protecting pervs? That Jefferson guy froze his cash but kept his hands to himself, didn't he? If anybody protects pervs, it's Catholic bishops who move molesting priests from parish to parish. Why aren't you going after the Pope?"

"It's perks, Emily. Congress is trying to protect its perks, like keeping earmarks a secret and themselves out of social security. They are the last plantation. Perks, not pervs."

"Oh, well, that very different. Never mind."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC