Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"A Plea to NBC: Cancel 'To Catch a Predator' Before Someone Dies Again"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 12:54 AM
Original message
"A Plea to NBC: Cancel 'To Catch a Predator' Before Someone Dies Again"
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 12:54 AM by Bluebear
Some of the problems will be more fundamental: She will find that all of the arrests may have been illegal. Under Texas law, there are only certain circumstances under which a police officer can make an arrest without a prior warrant. But in all of these “To Catch a Predator” decoy-house arrests, it will come to light that not only was there no warrant but the police had done literally no prior investigation. Instead, they simply camped outside the decoy house and arrested the men who emerged after receiving a prior signal from the Dateline crew inside. The only thing Doris Berry won’t quite be able to figure out is whether this means that Dateline had become an agent of the Murphy Police Department or whether the relationship was the other way around.

====

This series causes quite a bit of lively discussion at DU. You can read the entire Esquire article online at:

http://www.esquire.com/features/predator0907


Nine months ago, NBC's 'To Catch a Predator' arrived in Murphy, Texas, to conduct a sting operation. The only honest thing that followed was the gunshot.

...It is past 3:00 p.m. and Chris Hansen, the host of “To Catch a Predator,” a recurring series on NBC’s Dateline television news program, arrived here at 8:30 this morning, having gotten hardly any sleep the night before. He never gets much sleep on these shoots. Although aspects of his show are tightly choreographed, Hansen and the rest of his production team must always remain loose limbed, ready to adapt to changing circumstances and unpredictable hours. The show’s protagonists, after all, are recruited on the fly, and everything depends on them. They drive the plot, and Hansen never knows exactly where that plot is going to take him. Before the unexpected series of events that began yesterday afternoon, for example, Hansen had no intention of ever being here, outside this house, waiting for a SWAT team on an overcast Sunday afternoon...

As Dan Schrack leaned against a folding table and talked on the phone, a number of Perverted Justice employees sat at nearby desks, working on computers. At some point, after Schrack hung up, some of these people ran the screen name and e-mail address and phone number of the man known as Wil through a variety of Internet search engines. They made certain discoveries, among them Wil’s real name and occupation.

A cameraman recorded a scene shortly thereafter, when one of the Perverted Justice employees informed Chris Hansen. He told Chris Hansen that the man they thought was nineteen was actually fifty-six, that his name was Bill Conradt, that he was not a college student but rather an assistant district attorney of a neighboring county, the county’s chief felony prosecutor....

At a little after 9:00 p.m., Detective Patterson overheard Lynn Keller, the lead producer of “To Catch a Predator,” discussing Bill Conradt with another Dateline employee, trying to come up with different strategies they might employ to lure him to Murphy. Detective Patterson was the only law-enforcement officer inside the decoy house, and at that moment, standing there listening to a couple of civilians devising ways to lure an assistant district attorney, he was beginning to feel very uncomfortable. He felt as if he was being made party to something he was not at all sure he wanted to be involved in. Finally he approached Keller, told her that as an officer with the Rowlett Police Department, he felt obligated to call his boss, the chief of police, and give him a heads-up regarding the whole matter brewing with Bill Conradt. Lynn Keller stopped him cold.

“You’re working for Dateline now,” she said...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Agree
this is a horrible excuse for ratings.
Criminal investigations are one thing but this should not be entertainment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm all for catching predators, but it should be the
result of good police work, not a tv network in search of ratings. Much too much bread and circus for my taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. As they say, the police are arresting people simply on a TV station's say-so.
I'm all for catching predators too, but we cannot alter the protocol of law in this country to accommodate entertainment programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScottytheRadical Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. I saw this show once, and it make me think of the Coliseum in Rome, throwing people to lions..
Irregardless of whether or not someone has committed a crime, isn't a bit disturbing to have their arrest made into a bizarre form of fetishized entertainment? This show is a way of publicly shaming and humiliating people for entertainment and profit, and to me that's incredibly diguisting.

I *hope* what they're doing is illegal.

Now, on the other hand, I'm all for teenage vigilante justice if delivered Hard Candy style. (Hard Candy being an incredibly engrossing indie-psychothriller that deals with the same subject as "To Catch a Predator" in a much more mature, and comfortably fictional, way.)

But anyway, reality TV is disturbing enough as it is without it being reality TV focused on ruining an innocent/guilty person's life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Ahhhhhhhh but you forget the "fear" factor behind these type of programs.
The more men they can lure into the trap, the bigger the crime becomes. So instead of having just a few truly dangerous predators that would make it easier to watch for law enforcement, they now have 1,000s of dangerous predators running loose. So now the sheep are under the impression that theres an epidemic of child molesters waiting for their children to prey upon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. So let me get this straight...
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 07:10 AM by The Vinyl Ripper
The officer was fine with all this until the potential perp turned out to be a member of the law enforcement community?

Only then did he start having qualms?

Sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Why in the 1990's in lower Michigan there were only 2 people that weren't convicted or
pushed into a plea bargain on child molestation charges, both were cops. One of them even admitted he fantasized about sexual contact with the 2 minors that accused him of molestation and he was found innocent of the charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC