Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newspeak: What's in a name? U.S. rebrands Iraq ex-insurgents (Reuters)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:53 AM
Original message
Newspeak: What's in a name? U.S. rebrands Iraq ex-insurgents (Reuters)
What's in a name? U.S. rebrands Iraq ex-insurgents
Sat Aug 25, 2007 9:34AM EDT

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - U.S. forces have rebranded one of the main insurgent groups in Iraq and now use the term "concerned local nationals" to refer to a group that once claimed responsibility for killing scores of Americans.

The updated vocabulary for referring to the 1920 Revolution Brigade, described by a U.S. commander on Saturday, is a sign of the abrupt change in tactics that has seen U.S. forces cooperate with former Sunni Arab enemies.

The 1920 Revolution Brigade was one of the main anti-American Sunni Arab insurgent groups in Iraq in the years after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion and has claimed responsibility for killing scores of U.S. troops in ambushes and bomb attacks.

more at:
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSGRA54290420070825
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. or how about "Extreme Neighbourhood Watch"? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. I remember when they changed them from resistance to insurgence
The MSM complied totally. It was because the term "resistance" brought up romantic WWII images, and they didn't want to have that when it came to Iraqis!

Another example of how the right thinks that labeling something can make it so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yup. It's a-a-all PR, baby!. . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. Herr bu$che 'n dic-k "rebranded" them all and now use the term
"all-CIAda" in each speach they catapult.

It's the K sound-effect... hear:

all-CIAda
viet-Kong
katapult

what else is new...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC