Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Childbirth Kills More Women - 13 Of Every 100,000 Live Births Kill Mother

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 12:36 PM
Original message
Childbirth Kills More Women - 13 Of Every 100,000 Live Births Kill Mother
Childbirth Kills More Women
13 Of Every 100,000 Live Births Kill Mother

WASHINGTON -- There has been an increase in the number of women dying in this country from childbirth.

The National Center for Health Statistics said the maternal mortality rate rose in 2004 to 13 per 100,000 live births. The rate was 12 per 100,000 in 2003, the first time it was above 10 since 1977.

Health experts cited a number of factors for the increase, including a jump in Caesarean sections, women giving birth at an older age, maternal obesity and even a change in how such deaths are reported.

One California doctor said that with 29 percent of all births now by Caesarean section, there's going to "be a price" since the women face a number of surgical risks not seen in normal childbirth.

http://www.local6.com/spotlight/13970288/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. That doesn't include the number of women whose health
has been ruined permanently.

Childbirth is a risky business. It needs to be voluntary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, voluntary from conception through the actual birth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Some more really really scary news
My son was diagnosed Monday with flesh eating bacteria. They have performed several operations and are pretty sure they have it all. Thank goodness. BUT this is the scary part...It was in the groin area in the lower intestines. And there was no cuts, no open wounds nothing like that. IT CAME FROM THE INSIDE. So the doctors surmise it was something he ate. The cleaned out his digestive tract and there is nothing there. BUT how in the hell did he get it.....This is very very scary isn't it. It could happen at anytime. Remember it is bacteria and even if you wash food you might not get it all off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. How about a seperate post for that?
The topic of maternal deaths may not be that important to you, but it IS important, and not something usually brought up.

Your topic would do well on it's own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. That IS scary!
Our guts are full of some of the nastiest bacteria you don't want to run into and as long as it stays contained where it's supposed to be, it's harmless.

But let it get out of that environment...YIKES! :scared:

I just looked up flesh-eating bacteria a couple nights ago...
http://www.nnff.org/nnff_what.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd like to know how this compares with other countries.
I didn't read the link... is there any mention?

I don't remember seeing this category in the WHO ranking of Health Care by countries.

This is important to know, but we usually only get the statistics on infant deaths.

Thanks for posting this! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. There was a thread yesterday on this, here's the link to that one too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tanuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes, and the version of the story in the other thread points out something important that is omitted
in the version above:
"_Quality of care: Three different studies indicate at least 40 percent of maternal deaths could have been prevented."

In other words, our broken health care system is killing moms needlessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Most other countries support
home birth. Here it has been regulated into virtual oblivion.

Statistically, homebirth, with quality care, is VERY safe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. do you have the statistics?
The OP says the maternal mortality rate for all pregnancies is 13/100,000. Do you know what it is for home birth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. try here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Thanks for that
A lot of people are dying these days due to lack of good health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah, Caesarean sections may pose more risks and loss of life,
but they sure make the doctors' lives more pleasant. Who wants to be gotten up in the middle of the night or be called away from a golf game to deliver a baby? Jeez!

Posts like this just stir up trouble and make people dissatisfied with life here in The World's Only Superpower.

Long may it wave!

Bombs Away!

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. a lot of c-sections are voluntary many are not.
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 02:59 PM by Maine-ah
mine was not, and it saved both of us. If I have another child, my hospital won't do a vbac, I will have to have another c-section. What I am wondering, is in that increased number of c-sections, how many of those are repeat c-sections?

edited for spelling...duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I have one friend and a family member who needed them.
But I have had neighbors and friends who have gotten them because they were more convenient. They have become the rule rather than the exception here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Probably most are not voluntary. The real question is probably necessary or not.
And also how they come about becoming necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. You might want to look and see who is doing the requesting.
A good many C-sections come at the request of the mother who prefer the idea of a quick procedure than a long, drawn out and uncomfortable natural labour.

Doctors as a rule aren't quite that callous when it comes to scheduling their patients' health around their personal lives. It's bad for their malpractice insurance if nothing else. Not to say that they won't select what they tell the patient with an eye to guiding them towards a preselected choice, but the final choice almost always comes down to the patient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Then someone needs to educate the mothers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is why anti-choice rhetoric INFURIATES me...
(well, one of the many reason). Also "men's rights" advocates who act like writing checks is exactly equivalent to the minor inconvenience of pregnancy and birth.

A good friend of mine almost died when she had her son. She was 23; healthy, fit, vegetarian, non-smoker, no history of anything. And then she developed severe hypertension in her pregnancy. Thank the gods, both she and the baby were saved, but it was terrifying. She won't risk it again.

It is not something that should EVER be forced on someone who doesn't want it. And it is not a choice to be taken lightly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Glad they are OK
eclampsia is NOT GOOD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. I almost did too. Something happened with the epidural. When they gave it
to me my blood pressure "dropped out". They had to call the crash cart and give me a shot in my groin that went to my heart. It revived me. I had a tubal ligation after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. The U$ of A is really
becoming 3rd world, are we going back in time when men had many wives because so many womenr died in childbirth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. which is why home birth is safer.
by a long, long shot. no hospital grown superbugs, no unnecessary c-sections, and no baby switching. birth belongs at home, with the family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
24. There was a flame fest little while ago...
about maternal deaths:

Murder: The Leading Cause of Death for Pregnant Women

Your post certainly seems to make more sense, at least to me.

Sid

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC