Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama looks forward to working with "global warming is a lot of crap" Sen. Coburn

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 05:39 PM
Original message
Obama looks forward to working with "global warming is a lot of crap" Sen. Coburn
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 05:47 PM by Bluebear
"There are some very capable Republicans who I have a great deal of respect for," Obama said in an interview with The Associated Press. "The opportunities are there to create a more effective relationship between parties."

Among the Republicans he would seek help from are Sens. Richard Lugar of Indiana, John Warner of Virginia and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, Obama said...

"I would also seek out people like Tom Coburn, who is probably the most conservative member of the U.S. Senate. He has become a friend of mine."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070825/ap_on_el_pr/obama_ap_interview

=========
Get new friends, Barack....

Senator Coburn, who said that lesbianism is "so rampant in some of the schools...that they'll let only one girl go to the bathroom."

Senator Coburn, who claims he can tell if someone is telling the truth because of his medical training.

Dr. Coburn, who said: "You know, I immediately thought about silicone breast implants and the legal wrangling and the class-action suits off that. And I thought I would just share with you what science says today about silicone breast implants. If you have them, you're healthier than if you don't. That is what the ultimate science shows...In fact, there's no science that shows that silicone breast implants are detrimental and, in fact, they make you healthier."

Senator Coburn, who thought Schindler's List was smut, an "all-time low, with full-frontal nudity, violence and profanity.

On gay rights, Senator Coburn said: "The gay community has infiltrated the very centers of power in every area across this country, and they wield extreme power... That agenda is the greatest threat to our freedom that we face today. Why do you think we see the rationalization for abortion and multiple sexual partners? That's a gay agenda."

Senator Coburn, who objects to legal abortion in cases of rape, and justifies his position by noting that his great-grandmother was raped by a sheriff.

Senator Coburn, who placed a hold on H.R. 923, the Emmett Till Unsolved Civil Rights Crime Act of 2007, a bill that would have reopened hate crimes cases from before 1970. This bill passed the House by a vote of 422-2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Talk about your strange political bedfellows.
If I was in the United States Senate, I wouldn't get within 100 feet of that insane right winger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, I thought that was a bit of an odd choice, even as an Obama fan--
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 05:44 PM by wienerdoggie
why is he a friend of Coburn's? I can understand Lugar and Warner--those guys are moderate and make sense sometimes, but COBURN??? If he wanted to use an ultra-conservative as an example, why not Grassley or Hagel, at least?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. (shrug) That's the nature of representative government. Gotta work with antagonists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Which liberal Democrat did Bush 'seek out' in '00-'06 and don't say Lieberman!
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 05:47 PM by Bluebear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. None, of course. That's partly why they suck. Whatever vengeful feelings we might have...
... doesn't change the fact that a President SHOULD be President of the ENTIRE country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. He can be. Doesn't mean he has to "seek out" the most conservative Senator
who has batshit crazy ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Yah, I think it does, actually...
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 06:22 PM by BlooInBloo
EDIT: It should require saying, but I of course *don't* advocate capitulating to pieces of shit like Coburn on much of anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
58. Yes, Pres of entire country. Also, more effective if can work with others.
Seems to me part of what is WRONG WITH BUSH is that he did not reach out to those who disagreed with him, he demonized them in many ways.

I see a similar demonization and failure to reach out here.

Sorta hypocritical for some of use to demonize Bush for not reaching out, when we would do the same thing in power to those who disagree.

Obama showed true leadership. That is so much better than partisan sniping.

So Coburn is on the other side on many issues. Is the way to encourage him to vote our way on other issues to demonize him and call him crazy? I don't think so.

I would rather see our government get things done, especially in progressive ways, than to continue a pattern of making ourselves "feel good" by demonizing opponents and polarizing the entire mess in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. Demonize him?? Coburn says the #1 problem in America is the "gay agenda"
I am expected to hope our Democratic leaders "reach out" to him? You think WE are polarizing things? Did you read any of Coburn's quotes in the original post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Coburn-about as anti-woman as you can get. Interesting and possibly revealing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Blonde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. They have worked together in the past on
legislation. It isn't odd that he would list him as someone he could work with. For all of Coburn's faults at the very least you know where he stands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. 'at the very least you know where he stands'...Well, that's comforting.
At least I know he is anti-gay, anti-woman, anti-environment.

Now tell me again why a Democratic President should be consulting with him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I know where he stands-on the neck of every woman in US. Let them work together in private sector.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
42. He didn't just say he could work with him - he called him a friend.
That part bothers me the most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Treating members of the other party as the spawn of Satan has
worked out so well for us the last 20 years.


Seems to me President Johnson had to get some die hard segregationist Senators on his side to pass the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Sorry, this is not "members of the other party".
This is the rightest of the right, anti-gay, anti-woman, anti-environment POS out there.

You don't have to treat him as the "Spawn of Satan", but tell me again why we have to seek out his counsel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
60. Oh dear...I didn't want
click on that thread about "Obama and the repukes he would work with"..didn't interest me.

This is not good. Like somebody said.."GET NEW FRIENDS, OBAMA"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I don't have a problem with his being friends with conservatives--
after all, I have some conservative friends/family too. But THAT conservative? Coburn's an asshole. Ick. Why, my sweet Obama, why???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
52. GOPers don't want to work with Democrats; They've proved they
believe Democrats are their enemy. They state it flat out.

They've said it many times, bipartisanship is date rape. When a GOPer is working with a Democrat they are working with that Democrat in order to screw all the other Democrats and the common good.

GOPers are the spawn of Satan, if one believes the spawn of Satan's name is Greed.

And Dems working with GOPers for the last 20 years have brought us exactly where we are today with the entire treasury of the US sitting in the pockets of the greedy elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. Another attack post?
What is going on around here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Begging your pardon, but it is not an "attack" to comment on the man's own words.
Obama has been on my short list to support. You want I should shut up about something that he says that concerns me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Ahhh, it's something to be "concerned" about
:D

I won't play the "concern troll" card - just ribbing you.

There have been a number of posts attacking Obama/Hillary today - I am wondering what is going on with all the infighting.

Can we not promote our candidate without making negative implications or worse about the other candidates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I don't have a candidate to promote.
If this is a negative implication, so be it. I don't need Coburn to have a hotline into the White House, the man is vile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. True, but you don't seriously think he is doing anything more than trying to look
like a team player do you?

I can't imagine he would actually take the advice of that jackass for real - do you?

You see what I am saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. He could gladly have stopped with Lugar & Warner.
All I can do is take the man at his word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. I can't imagine him giving much more than lip service to Coburn WRT environment
JMHO.

Do you seriously think Obama is an idiot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. 'Do you seriously think Obama is an idiot?' - Kindly stop baiting me.
I said I had been considering supporting him. Idiot no, but I believe Obama may well be less progressive than I would have hoped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Perhaps
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 06:48 PM by HughMoran
I just don't see linking Coburns idiotic stance on the environment to Obama's statement that he could work with him.

So you are creating an indirect link that implies that Obama doesn't support the environment.

Kind of a stretch in my opinion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I think your whole premise that I am implying Obama is anti-environment is a stretch
And frankly I don't need you casting asparagus at me here. Ciao.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. I don't agree
This is not attack, it's criticism. It's a fine line admittedly, but I see nothing her except facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. In today's environment of back and forth volleys
I may be a bit biased...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. A vote is a vote. If you can get it from Satan himself to pass good legislation, go for it
Isn't that just a legislative reality? We all hate Lieberman here, but I'd certainly want Democrats to work with him in passing environmental protection legislation, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Yes, I can just imagine Coburn will be a reliable vote for progressive issues.
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 06:36 PM by Bluebear
I look forward to him caucusing with us.


...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Every vote counts (in Congress, anyway). "Working with" doesn't imply BFFdom
The basic thrust of the comment is obviously PR anyway--"I can work with both sides of the aisle, etc., bullshit, etc." Almost every mainstream politician says it, has said it, and will say it. Whether it bears any relation to reality is another matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Could you imagine a Republican saying "I look forward to working with Edward Kennedy!"
"He has become a good friend of mine and I look forward to seeking his advice!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. They've said exactly that. Even Bush has, for example on the NCLB bill, etc.
NLCB's utter crappiness aside, this sort of "I am a uniter" bullshit is slung liberally from both sides all the time. Part of it is true (take any vote you can get for good or better legislation--Biden/Lugar's counter to the IWR is a good example) and part of it is PR (look at me! I am nonpartisan!).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. OK then, "a vote is a vote". Coburn will magically change for us & vote for good legislation.
I look forward to seeing it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. You'll note I said that exactly nowhere. But if he does vote with us even once, great!
Doesn't make him any less of a bigoted asshole, and it doesn't somehow taint the passing of good legislation. Nor does it taint the people who convinced him to make a rare progressive vote. Really--what is the problem with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Sorry, I am clearly an Obama-basher and have an agenda.
(Read upthread) I have now been officially caught up in the Great DU Primary Wars. :hi:

Cheers jp, working with the opposition is fine, but Coburn is beyong the pale to me, that's all I was saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. I don't think you're a "basher," I'm just saying the statement may not mean what you think
It -may- mean he's secretly in league with Coburn and agrees with him on a lot of policy, but I hardly think that's the only explanation, and I don't think it's the most likely one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. the problem is the quid pro quo.
For what good legislation is Tom Coburn - surely one of the greatest nutcakes to ever grace the Senate - going to vote? And even if he did say "aye" for something halfway decent, what would be the cost?

No. You make deals with the devil when you can get the better of him. Given our recent track record on that score, I don't trust our own to win a compromise as far as I can throw the lot of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. See post 38 below. It doesn't look like anything was given up for that bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. ok - I could probably agree with Coburn and other rw nutcakes on a number of things
without anyone giving up anything. An internet database of federal spending is a good idea, good fences make good neighbors, the sky is blue.

The idea of trying to fix what's wrong with the country by collaborating with the same people who fucked it up in the first place is still an astoundingly stupid idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
36. Hope he's keeping an eye on his daughters.
Make sure that Dr Coburn doesn't sterilize them when he's not looking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhombus Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
38. Obama worked with Coburn to create an Internet Database of Federal Spending
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 07:56 PM by rhombus
There's nothing wrong with citing a colleague in the senate who you agree with on some issues. Coburn is really good on ethics and fiscal responsibility issues.

http://obama.senate.gov/press/060908-senate_passes_c/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. 'Coburn is really good on ethics'
Depends what you mean by ethics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
39. Uhhh, I think this is his very point.
He chose the most bat-shit crazy (with apologies to bat shit everywhere) to say that he'll reach out to the other side. He's trying to appear to be a uniter not a . . . yeah.

I wouldn't take this too seriously. He's thinking of the bat-shit crazy vote in this country (about 27%). Look at all the Dems. in the 80s who bought the koolaid Ronnie was sellin'. Yeah, so I see what he's doing rhetorically/strategically. Get the bat-shit crazy vote and then ignore any of their desires.

Ease up, people. This is politics after all.

This post is approved by Kucinich 2008. DENNIS the Menace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. It's more than reaching. "He has become a friend of mine."
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 10:01 PM by Bluebear
I think that is the phrase that bothered me the most. I certainly couldn't be 'friends' with anybody so vile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
46. "... lesbianism is "so rampant in some of the schools..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. Unfortunately, Coburn's anti-gay statement on the matter dates to 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. Possible. Paranoid homophobes united.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RFKHumphreyObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
47. He's doing what good Senators do
Edited on Sun Aug-26-07 01:53 AM by socialdemocrat1981
Paul Wellstone succeeded in forging a number of friendships across the political divide and worked with a number of right wing Senators whom he couldn't have disagreed more with in philosophy to implement legislation that would benefit the American people. In fact he worked with conservative Senators to achieve positive outcomes for veterans, for people with illnesses and so on.

Ted Kennedy also has done this on a number of occasions. In fact his friendship with right wing conservative Senator Orrin Hatch played a key role in helping him overcome his problems with alcoholism.

Senator John Kerry and Nevada Senator Chic Hecht formed a friendship despite being poles apart in ideology after Kerry saved Hecht from choking. Kerry also seems to have been on friendly terms with John McCain and the two worked constructively together on Vietnam-related issues

Just because friendships and alliances are forged across the political divide in the Senate doesn't mean that a particular Senator is selling out his principles or ideology to do so or that they are any less progressive or liberal for doing so. In fact it means that they are big enough to put aside their partisan differences and constructively work on issues for the good of the nation while recognizing their differences on other issues

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Singling out an anti-gay, anti-woman, anti-environment as a friend is not "good"
Edited on Sun Aug-26-07 02:01 AM by Bluebear
How do I know what he will and won't sell out if this is type of person he counts as friends? He singled out this man as his friend in his statement today. As the type of Republican he looks forward to working with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyblue Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #47
55. Agreed. Obama is my 4th choice.
After Biden, and tie for 2nd Clinton and Richardson. Wish we were cleaning house with every Dem candidate in a landslide defeat of every Republican candidate. Ya got your failures in the M-E, loss of ability to join Unions and get overtime pay, poison food and water, plain psycho (apparently daddy screwed with my head) just totally psycho republicans are involved in all sorts of corruption because i guess their salary isn't enough. Why is it so hard for Americans to get a grip on reality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
51. Two thoughts
One, somebody posted earlier that this wasn't even true. I've got no clue because I understand it to be an AP interview.

Saying it is true, I kind of notice something about Obama. He butters people up, reels them in - and then smacks them down hard. If you need to get into someone's house, you can take a bat or a pie. He leads with a pie, but has a bat for backup. He's got something to say to the nutball right. I don't know what it is, but it's going to come out some time in the next two weeks. This is just Obama getting the attention of the right with a pie. I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
53. Great Conference Facilities in DC
Edited on Sun Aug-26-07 03:49 AM by autorank


From, "The Hill" April 19, 2007

All this may surprise Obama’s supporters.

In a fundraising e-mail sent to supporters at the beginning of March, the candidate wrote that Washington’s special-interest industry is trying “to own our political process and dictate our policies in Washington.

“We’re not going to play that game. We’re not taking any contributions from Washington lobbyists or political action committees. We’re going to transform the political process by bringing together hundreds of thousands of ordinary Americans to build a campaign.”

Critics of lobbyist influence in politics say Obama cannot make a serious bid for the Oval Office and escape the influence of special interests.

(Shocked, I'm just shocked at this and a little sad too :cry:)

Other Obama fund raisers work for companies that have hired lobbyists to work on issues of the jurisdiction of Senate committees on which Obama sits.

Bill Kennard, for example, is managing director at The Carlyle Group, based in Washington. The Carlyle Group paid a lobbying firm, Ogilvy Government Relations, $460,000 last year to lobby on pension legislation and trade relations with China and Korea, issues that fall within Obama’s committee responsibilities. He sits on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee and the Foreign Relations panel.

-----------------


Same old, same old...SELLOUT bullshit. Oh, no lobbyist money, except indirectly through the executives of the firms who hire the lobbyists.

NO HEROES, NO LEADERS...RUN YOUR OWN LIFE AND WORK WITH OTHERS WHO RUN THEIRS.

NO HEROES...not this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
54. Working with people who've done their best to destroy
everything you allegedly stand for is SO not a good idea.

It may work if you're a Senator, but believe me, if he thinks that goodwill will last if he makes it to the White House, he's deluding himself.

These are NOT nice people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
56. tom coburn is an idiot eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
57. This is just another reason for me not to support Obama. eom

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toughboy Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
59. Have to agree with this post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
61. yea I don't like where this is headed
it almost sounds like Obama is working to create an atmosphere in Congress where he could get his preferred legislation passed. What a rookie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
62. He is looking for Sainthood when he wants to work with those folks!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terri S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
64. Relax, Obama co-sponsored a government transparency bill with Coburn last year.
That was a win/win. http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001485.php">link Obama stated himself that Coburn is one of the most conservative Republicans. Apparently now and then on some issue they can work together. Of course, not getting anything done because you absolutely refuse to talk to people who think very differently than you do is a great way to get government to work, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. I will not relax, this is not about a bill, it was him lauding him as a good friend.
Coburn is an anti-woman anti-gay psychopath as you can read by some of his quotes. I don't need the next president to "look forward to working with Republicans like him."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
66. If he wants to work with Republicans who are bigoted culture warrors--
--why not Bob Barr and Dick Armey? They are every bit as nasty as Coburn, but they respect the constitution enough to be working against the PATRIOT Act and other constitutional abuses.

Or how about Ron Paul, who has the added bonus of not being an anti-science whackjob?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC