And not unfamiliar in its concepts. However, the bottom line thing I've never understood is that eventually, a parasite, unchecked, kills the host, and then neither of them can live. That is what I can't understand, and what they don't seem to grasp, that by killing us they eventually kill themselves, it is a dependent situation. For example, the polluters of the world can't seem to grasp that the dirty air we breathe is the same dirty air they and their children breathe. It is as if the parasite has gorged so much that it's brain may be affected. I've wondered if, in these last years, it has begun to 'indulge' itself to death.
They think they have us, I’m not willing to have faith in them. I am finding hope in the millions of small movements that are occurring all over the world, Small events, like ‘buying local’, all which are flying under the radar, but gaining in strength and size.
BLESSED UNREST
How the Largest Movement in the World Came Into Being and Why No One Saw It Coming.
By Paul Hawken.
Grass Roots Rising
Article Tools Sponsored By
By ROBERT SULLIVAN
Published: August 5, 2007
“Blessed Unrest” is about a movement that no one has noticed, not even the people involved. “The movement,” as Paul Hawken calls it, is made up of an unknowable number of citizens and mostly ragtag organizations that come and go. But when you do see it, you understand it to include NGOs, nonprofit agencies and a seemingly disparate range of people who might describe themselves as environmental activists, as well as people who might not describe themselves as anything at all but are protesting labor injustices, monitoring estuaries, supporting local farming or defending native people from being robbed of the last forests. There are a few billionaires, working hard to give their wealth away, and there are even some Christian evangelicals, who have decided the earth is not theirs to trash, but the movement is mostly about shared beliefs, even if those beliefs are unproclaimed. “Life is the most fundamental human right,” Hawken writes, “and all of the movements within the movement are dedicated to creating the conditions for life, conditions that include livelihood, food, security, peace, a stable environment and freedom from external tyranny.”
Still confused? Skip to the 100-plus-page appendix, a list of movement-oriented concerns from child labor to “green banking” to climate change, reflecting years of post-lecture business-card collecting on the author’s part. Hawken, the ecologically conscious founder of the gardening chain Smith & Hawken as well as a number of other enterprises involving things like sustainable agriculture and energy-saving technologies, makes the movement’s disparateness seem not so disparate — in its critique of markets, for example. “If there is a pervasive criticism of global capitalism that is shared by all actors in the movement, it is this observation: goods seem to have become more important, and are treated better, than people. What would a world look like if that emphasis were reversed?” The movement, most importantly, is very lowercase, its sensitivity being its great strength and, naturally, its tactical weakness. Do-gooding will always have a perception problem. Mountaintop-removal mining rarely risks seeming behind the times, even though it is; Amazonian tribesmen’s marching on a World Trade Organization meeting seems futile and quixotic, even though it’s not.” Cont…
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/05/books/review/Sullivan-t.html?ex=1188187200&en=ee2ed709829efabc&ei=5070