Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Fisk may need to have a talk with Greg Palast

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:32 PM
Original message
Robert Fisk may need to have a talk with Greg Palast

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/8/25/21713/8731

Robert Fisk goes off the deep end!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=170604&mesg_id=170681
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Sat Aug-25-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
76. He has every single tinfoil talking point committed to memory.
And says he's not a CT? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Wotta fuckin' moran.

___________________________________________________________

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Fisk

Described by the New York Times as "probably the most famous foreign correspondent in Britain",<3> he has over thirty years of experience in international reporting, dating from 1970s Belfast and Portugal's 1974 Carnation Revolution, the 1975-1990 Lebanese Civil War, and encompassing the 1979 Iranian revolution, the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war, 1991 Persian Gulf War, and 2003 Invasion of Iraq. He is the world's most-decorated foreign correspondent,<4> having received numerous awards including the British Press Awards' International Journalist of the Year award seven times. Fisk speaks good vernacular Arabic, and is one of the few Western journalists to have interviewed Osama bin Laden (three times between 1994 and 1997).<5>

In the British journalistic tradition of the foreign correspondent, Fisk has developed a personal analysis of the foreign affairs that he covers and presents them in that light, often with trenchant criticism of the British government and its allies. His admirers take this as a sign of his depth of knowledge; his critics take it as confirmation of his incorrigible bias. Fisk is a consistent critic of what he perceives as hypocrisy in British government foreign policy.

Fisk's reporting—and his bestselling books, based on his field notes and recordings— offer strong criticisms of Middle Eastern governments as well as what he perceives as hypocrisy in British and United States government foreign policy. His view of journalism is that it must "challenge authority — all authority — especially so when governments and politicians take us to war", and he quotes with approval the Israeli journalist Amira Hass: "There is a misconception that journalists can be objective ... What journalism is really about is to monitor power and the centres of power."<6> Fisk has received widespread praise and criticism for his condemnation of violence against civilians, what his admirers see as his courageous reporting, and his willingness to challenge the statements of governments. Speaking of the historical basis for the conflicts he has covered Fisk said, "After the allied victory of 1918, at the end of my father's war, the victors divided up the lands of their former enemies. In the space of just seventeen months, they created the borders of Northern Ireland, Yugoslavia and most of the Middle East. And I have spent my entire career — in Belfast and Sarajevo, in Beirut and Baghdad — watching the people within those borders burn."
Osama bin Laden, 9/11, and the war in Afghanistan
Fisk is one of the few Western journalists to have interviewed Osama bin Laden - three times (all published by The Independent: December 6, 1993 July 10, 1996, and March 22, 1997). During one of Fisk's interviews with Bin Laden, Fisk noted an attempt by Bin Laden to possibly recruit him. Bin Laden said, "Mr Robert, one of our brothers had a dream. He dreamed ... that you were a spiritual person ... this means you are a true Muslim." Fisk replied, "Sheikh Osama, I am not a Muslim ... I am a journalist".<7> Bin Laden and Adam Gadahn, an alleged Al-Qaeda spokesman and translator of American birth, have apparently mentioned Robert Fisk in speeches. Osama bin Laden said Fisk's reporting was "neutral".<8> According to a MEMRI report, on September 2, 2006, in a videotaped statement, Adam Gadahn, said that Fisk and George Galloway have a "respect and admiration for Islam," have "sympathy for Muslims their causes", and added "I say to them, isn't it time you stopped sitting on the fence and came over to the side of truth?". <9>.



http://www.counterpunch.org/fisk02152003.html
February 15, 2003

The Case Against War
Tales to Frighten Children
By ROBERT FISK

In the end, I think we are just tired of being lied to. Tired of being talked down to, of being bombarded with Second World War jingoism and scare stories and false information and student essays dressed up as "intelligence". We are sick of being insulted by little men, by Tony Blair and Jack Straw and the likes of George Bush and his cabal of neo-conservative henchmen who have plotted for years to change the map of the Middle East to their advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. WHY all of a sudden is Greg Palast being trashed? BTW I know he's not BRITISH
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 10:37 PM by seemslikeadream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would never say Fisk is off the wall. This is blow back
We have to get out of the Middle East and let them run their own business and country. We are just asking for trouble with this endless foreign policy of trying to run other peoples countries. I would think the Brits have learned that even if the leaders have not. With over 700 bases around the world the USA will be paying for that long after I am dead. People have just got to wake up to what our leaders are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. K & R - As more and more relatively mainstream
thinkers begin to speak out about 9-11 truth - which they inevitably will - the most ardent deniers will begin to howl like banshees and fling poo like juvenile apes. Predictable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. You got it bass ackwards. He's regained sanity by questioning the Official Conspiracy Theory 9-11
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 11:28 PM by EVDebs
Just examine Richard Gage's video re the fall of the towers and other WTC blgs

http://www.ae911truth.org/

and dig this, a NIST official is asking questions now,

James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST's investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Some people (like the President)
refuse to consider the prospect of complexity. Cognitive psychologists refer to black and white thinking as a cognitive distortion. For example, if one questions the official account of 9/11, someone may accuse that person of desiring to live under Sharia law. Because as we all know, there are only two possible prospects in the Universe...a police state under George W. Bush or Sharia law under al Qaeda.

It is possible to oppose BOTH corrupt politicians who would use terrorism as a pretext for an ulterior agenda AND radical Islamic terrorists who would murder Americans based on their extremist interpretation of jihad.

Questioning the official account of 9/11 is not based on a desire to live under Sharia law. It's not even based on anti-American sentiment. Or a desire to be privy to secret knowledge. It's based on an official account that doesn't add up. And the lack of transparency. It took over three years to have a CYA CIA IG report declassified for crying out loud. And that was just the 19 page executive summary!

Yet, the same secretive officials have told the public they cannot prevent terror attacks without resorting to permanent war and the use of anti-terrorism tactics out of Saddam Hussein's playbook. That isn't acceptable. Not for a President that ignored briefings and refused to hold Cabinet meetings despite urgent warnings.

So yes I have some skepticism. Calling someone a conspiracy theorist for being skeptical is a garbage tactic. Citizens should ask why so called journalists have no curiosity about 9/11. They are citizens too. Aren't they concerned about the lack of accountability? Don't they wonder why Bush cannot do his job without trashing the Constitution?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good on him.....
About bloody time.

Daily Kos censorship meanwhile.. that is the real disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC