|
You will never hear mainstream mention of socialism or alternative ways to distribute wealth.
For instance, the blasphemous notion that, instead of bailing out the corporations and banks when there is a bundle or a bust, (thereby maintain a power base on the economy, jobs, and production) one could share the common wealth by considering, (at least entertaining the notion) of a negative income tax.
All things being equal, and considering an economy where a large proportion of taxes go this-away and that-away for military, aggression, etc. Who does the spending and buying in a population? The people!
So, while economists might argue why my ideas about giving the people the money to spend, (and they will spend in on something, licit or illicit, of course) would, in turn, bolster the economy and increase the need for goods and services, which would then go full circle and create more jobs and increase wages. Oh, I know, that is way too socialistic to contemplate when capitalism rules the roost and its only a matter of if you have or have not.
I would like to think of that notion as Upriver Economics. All the little streams, creeks and smaller waterways empty into the larger one, thusly keeping the level up and the flow going. When the people are subject to drought, they cannot feed the common, economic river.
Oh, but you have to have this kind of system where you skim off every ounce possible by way of gross profit, inequitable income taxes, usury-rate interest, and exorbitant wealth gathering for prestige and power. Today's, parasitic beast, capitalism thrives by exploitation of the weak and keeps them powerless, hence we drink the thick, congealing urine of trickle-down economics rather than enjoying the many, copious fruits of Upriver, collective investement.
|