Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taliban Raise Poppy Production to a Record Again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:41 AM
Original message
Taliban Raise Poppy Production to a Record Again
Taliban Raise Poppy Production to a Record Again

By DAVID ROHDE
Published: August 26, 2007
LASHKAR GAH, Afghanistan, Aug. 25 — Afghanistan produced record levels of opium in 2007 for the second straight year, led by a staggering 45 percent increase in the Taliban stronghold of Helmand Province, according to a new United Nations survey to be released Monday.

The report is likely to touch off renewed debate about the United States’ $600 million counternarcotics program in Afghanistan, which has been hampered by security challenges and endemic corruption within the Afghan government.

“I think it is safe to say that we should be looking for a new strategy,” said William B. Wood, the American ambassador to Afghanistan, commenting on the report’s overall findings. “And I think that we are finding one.”

Mr. Wood said the current American programs for eradication, interdiction and alternative livelihoods should be intensified, but he added that ground spraying poppy crops with herbicide remained “a possibility.” Afghan and British officials have opposed spraying, saying it would drive farmers into the arms of the Taliban.

While the report found that opium production dropped in northern Afghanistan, Western officials familiar with the assessment said, cultivation rose in the south, where Taliban insurgents urge farmers to grow poppies.

Although common farmers make comparatively little from the trade, opium is a major source of financing for the Taliban, who gain public support by protecting farmers’ fields from eradication, according to American officials. They also receive a cut of the trade from traffickers they protect.

In Taliban-controlled areas, traffickers have opened more labs that process raw opium into heroin, vastly increasing its value. The number of drug labs in Helmand rose to roughly 50 from 30 the year before, and about 16 metric tons of chemicals used in heroin production have been confiscated this year.



more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/26/world/asia/26heroin.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, records were made to be broken. Does this one get an *?
After all they had lots of help ... from us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. "the current American programs for eradication, interdiction and alternative livelihoods". Ah, shit.
How's that working out in Colombia, Mr. Ambassador?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade
http://www.lycaeum.org/drugwar/DARKALLIANCE/ciaheron.html

With the 'catastrophic success' of Bush I and now Bush II's war on drugs we now wonder what extra-Consitutional source of funds for the military's 'black op' (and Congressional campaign contributions via overseas sourced drug running) are up to these days.

The funny thing is prior to 9-11 Bush's administration actually was paying the Taliban to decrease the opium crop,

"The Taliban, which briefly banned poppy cultivation in 2000 in an effort to gain U.S. diplomatic recognition and aid, now both supports and draws support from that profitable crop; Afghanistan provides 92 percent of the world's heroin.

Yet Western policies designed to eliminate the Taliban and the poppy are at odds with each other. While NATO troops scramble, between battles, to rebuild rural infrastructure, U.S. advisers urge Afghan anti-narcotics police to eradicate the livelihood of 2 million poor farmers. "

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/12/17/ING08MTPMB1.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Large and Larger crops of poppies? Where does the product go and who Gets the $$???
This has implications for funding all kinds of entities fighting one another in Afghanistan and beyond.

All that 'product' is not just sitting somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's odd that the Taliban is being blamed for increased
production. Pre-invasion of Afghanistan, the Taliban had prohibited the growing of poppies in the country. Found that out a couple years ago with google.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC