Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Freedom has been dead for decades, we are just hearing the swan song..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 06:39 PM
Original message
Freedom has been dead for decades, we are just hearing the swan song..
Freedom died when the American people decided to let the government and private enterprise acting on the behalf of government to search through our bodily fluids for evidence to use against us on charges of failing to believe the government's lies.

Since there are no victims, drug "crimes" are crimes against the state.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another subject no one wants to talk about...
So where do the Democratic candidates stand on bringing the drug war to a close?

I seem to recall that Edwards is fine with the drug war as currently constituted. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. What?
No one disagrees with me?

At least the one who recommended my post agreed with me..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Round and round this post goes...
When it will get a reply, nobody knows..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. My doctor Has Me On Heavy Narcotics: Fentanyl and Morphine
which I, legitimately need just to carry on a somewhat normal life
(being able to move around and go to the grocery store and such)

But the deal is ,in return, I have to let him test my urine
to make sure I'm not smoking pot

which makes the narcotics work so much better
and without all of the nausea

as well as give me a little happiness in life

Makes no sense, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Under what circumstances has random drug testing occured?
Isn't it largely an employement policy, not a governmental policy?

I know that I'd want to assure myself that my employees weren't using illicit narcotics.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Could you not tell by their behavior?
Edited on Tue Aug-28-07 09:43 AM by The Vinyl Ripper
If not, why would you care?

Employment policy is not effected by government policy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ah so you favor firing people just cause they are acting oddly?
Isn't that more repressive?

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. He/she's is in favor of firing people because they act odd
I find that itself odd. Lets fire him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. "acting oddly"???
What a strange thing to say. You should fire a person because they aren't performing their job well.

If you're so insecure about your ability to judge employees that you need to collect and examine their urine and feces samples to judge their performance, maybe the problem lies with your management skills? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. So you are in favor of searching people's most intimate bodily fluids?
Without any reason for suspicion?

And yes, if the behavior is so "odd" that someone cannot do their job the should be fired.

I answered a question, now you do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yes I am in favor of random drug testing as a company policy
Or to be more precise, i think companies can decide for themselves whether or not they want to institute such policies.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Well, you certainly are a freedom loving individual. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. What freedom am I stepping on?
The freedom to do illegal drugs?

Those drugs are called illegal for a reason.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. If they're doing the job, what business is it of an employer?
Edited on Tue Aug-28-07 09:53 AM by TahitiNut
The key words are "doing the job" and "business". I don't see employment as any legitimate license to intrude into personal matters.

Employers who believe they have the right to perform medical tests on their employees, but claim they don't know if someone's legally employable just slay me. Maybe if employers paid more attention to whether their PRODUCTS endangered the health of their customers instead of whther the employees smoked a joint at home the night before would be more worthy of their public license to do business?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. Vinyl Ripper, maybe you need to explain a little
Maybe I'm too tired (no sleep) to get it, but I'm not sure what you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. It seems perfectly obvious to me..
And apparently to a number of others on the thread.

Why should employers have the right to determine what you do when you are off the job as long as you can do the job?

The War On Drugs has gone on so long that Americans think Prohibition is perfectly normal and right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. The support for the War on (some) Drugs has cost the Democrats millions of votes
Think of all of the young African American men disenfranchized for the benefit of the drug warriors and the for-profit prison industry alone...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Excellent point...
And to go along with that point here's another.

Why should anyone who prefers an illegal drug to the two legal drugs bother to vote for a Democrat who wants to put them in prison just as much as the Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
18. Why Has It Been Dead For Decades?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC