'Bombing caves is not something that counts'
Evan Thomas' cover story in the new issue of Newsweek is a fascinating piece on the "ongoing hunt for Osama bin Laden." There's a lot to digest in the article, I think this tidbit stood out:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/051595.php http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20430170/site/newsweek/ The American effort to chase bin Laden into this forbidding realm was hobbled and clumsy from the start. While the terrain required deep local knowledge and small units, career officers in the U.S. military have long been wary of the Special Operations Forces best suited to the task. In the view of the regular military, such "snake eaters" have tended to be troublesome, resistant to spit-and-polish discipline and rulebooks.
Rather than send the snake eaters to poke around mountain caves and mud-walled compounds, the U.S. military wanted to fight on a grander stage, where it could show off its mobility and firepower. To the civilian bosses at the Pentagon and the eager-to-please top brass, Iraq was a much better target.
By invading Iraq, the United States would give the Islamists -- and the wider world -- an unforgettable lesson in American power.Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was on Rumsfeld's Defense Policy Board and, at the time, a close confidant of the SecDef. In November 2001, Gingrich told a NEWSWEEK reporter,
"There's a feeling we've got to do something that counts -- and bombing caves is not something that counts."