Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

abraham lincoln lacks experience

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 08:44 PM
Original message
abraham lincoln lacks experience
i mean, really. some useless lawyer couldn't get himself more than a single term in congress. tried for senate in 1858 and had his butt handed to him by stephen douglas.

now he wants to be president?

we need someone with EXPERIENCE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. well I know I won't be voting for him
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Abe's resume' is definitely complete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good one, good point.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just HAVE to K&R this one!!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. a real honor coming from you :)
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton ahead of Lincoln by ten points.
Someone needs to tell him, facial hair is so 19th century. Not to mention his lack of corporate savy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm starting a "DRAFT BYRD - INOUYE for 2008" movement!
Who the hell's with me.

No two Dems have more experience than those two crafty veterans...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. He dresses funny, too, and has bad hair and is too tal.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. And he has a facial defect! The people won't go for that! series!11 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Misrepresentation.
Abraham Lincoln's experience in national politics went deeper than two years in Congress. He was an anti-war activist in 1846 (which cost him his seat in the House), worked to get Zachary Taylor elected president, helped form the Republican Party in 1854 after the Nebraska-Kansas Act spread the boundaries of slavery, and from 1854 was a force in national politics. He turned down a chance to run for the Senate in 54 to help promote his new party, did run in 58, and eventually won the presidency in 1860. His life showed a continuously increasing involvement in national politics. He wasn't just some hayseed lawyer who ran for the presidency one day. That's a myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. thanks for posting, that's good information. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Right.
It is interesting to note that the attacks on some of our democratic candidates are likewise "misrepresentations." I think that both the OP and your response are absolutely on target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. That's why we have elections, ain't it?
So everyone can examine the various qualifications of each candidate and decide which candidate they feel best about leading the nation. Lincoln's qualifications went far beyond his years in elected office, and voters saw that. Interesting that the top three Democrats this election all have limited experience in elected office, but each have qualifications that make up for that dearth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. what's really interesting is how democrats care about qualifications, vs. republicans
shrub was obviously unqualified from the get-go, and they manufactured minimal qualifications -- handing him a business "success" with the texas rangers, handing him the texas governorship, pretending that that made him qualified to be president, etc.

reagan's resume was only barely more fleshed out, though he admittedly had some actual political talent. well, at least he could read a script.

bush senior was actually qualified, i have to give them that.

but it's interesting how republicans complain bitterly (well, then, that is what they do best) when democrats have only comparatively modest qualifications, then they run their own candidates with absolutely ridiculous resumes and enshrine them in sainthood or say they're hand-picked by god himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. He wasn't even renominated... Republicans chose John C. Frémont as their candidate.
Lincoln accepted the nomination of the National Union Party, a short-lived union of Northern Democrats and Republicans who rejected the "Radical Republican" nominee, Frémont.

The Republicans flip-flopped in their support for a wartime President. Way to support the troops, guys.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Union_Party_%28United_States%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_Republican_%28USA%29

Next time you hear the phrase "Party of Lincoln" from a Repug, be sure to remind them they were the Party of Lincoln's FIRST TERM ONLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. now there is something about lincoln i didn't know!
thanks!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. Nominated.
Great job. Thank you for this.

Nominated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. Lincoln was one of the nation's foremost "trial lawyers"
representing railroads, not exactly championing the cause of the little guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
19. Talk about unelectable! Lincoln's enemies called him "the ape from Illinois."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC