LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:15 AM
Original message |
I'm betting $10 that Bush will do a recess appointment to fill the AG slot |
|
There is no way that the Senate Judiciary committee is going to allow another stooge to get a floor vote. Bush will wait til a recess, appoint the person he wants and that person will serve until 2009.
That's my prediction
|
FormerDittoHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:16 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I'd give odds as well. That $10 is safer than if it was in the bank. n/t |
The Wizard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:16 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Any truth to the rumor |
|
he's considering some guy named Draco?
|
TechBear_Seattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:16 AM
Response to Original message |
|
And why so many people here are calling for Reid to reconvene the Senate early, to prevent that possibility.
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. Reid doesn't have to call the Senate in early, the Senate just has to be in session |
|
He can have a local Senator (Mikulski, Cardin, or Webb) hold a Senate Session. He mentioned that he was going to do that anyway to prevent recess appointments.
|
TechBear_Seattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
I would have thought a quorum is necessary to call the Senate into session, but I defer to the legal eagles.
|
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:17 AM
Response to Original message |
4. We're in a recess... n/t |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:17 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Today would be the day to do it then |
|
since they're in a recess now.
My, oh my oh my oh my!!! Go away for a few weeks and... WOW! my oh my oh my!!!
:hi:
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:18 AM
Response to Original message |
6. I heard that Paul Clements would be acting AG. |
madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:21 AM
Response to Original message |
8. That's the only way he will fill the AG slot. Unless, |
|
he nominates Patrick Fitzgerald.
|
bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I think there's a good chance - at least 50% he'll recess appoint someone - he needs a safe harbor. That said he might gamble that he can get a relatively safe nominee through congress. Bryant Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
|
Jim__
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message |
11. You're probably right. |
|
But, if the new AG is a recess appointment, he'll get as much respect as gonzo got. A recess appointment will just be further evidence of bush's contempt for justice.
|
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Yes but what does Bush have to lose |
|
He's out of office in 2 years, the appointment would stay until the next major election which would be 2008. Say what you will about Harry Reid - that's not the guy Bush has to get his AG choice past. He has to get it past Leahy, Schumer, Biden, Kerry, Feingold and the remaining members of the Judiciary Committee. And I don't think they'll let him slide, unless Feingold decides the pResident has the right to have the AG of his choice (he did that with Asscrap)
|
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:23 AM
Response to Original message |
12. A (face saving for Reid) Compromise... |
|
It will be a "temporary" AG (that is remote-controlled by the usual gang) that kind of rides out the rest of Bush's term because the confirmation hearings on his "real choice" gets bogged down....
|
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. Reid has absolutely nothing to do with the AG vote - that's Leahy's game |
|
You have to get the AG through the Judiciary Committee. And say what you will about the 'ineffectiveness' of the Senate Democrats, I highly doubt that Leahy will allow another Gonzaelez clone through the committee.
|
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Exactly my point...Reid promised to stop an interim appontment... |
|
so when Leahy stops the formal appointment, he, in effect, allows the temporary appointment to stand.
This, in turn, allows Bush to interim appoint without embarrassing Reid.
|
Quixote1818
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |
16. I am betting no, there would be incredible outrage from a lot of people if that happined. nt |
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. But his approval rating is so crappy - it just doesn't matter to him |
|
the AG is the one person who stands between Bush and impeachment, which is why the democrats have been silent about doing anything with impeachment - they needed to get rid of the crony first.
Bush needs protection and will think nothing of doing a recess appointment since his approval rating already sucks and he's a lame duck anyways
|
Lone_Star_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I heard that the Solicitor General is going to fill in until the Senate confirms the new AG.
I don't think that he can do a recess appointment even if he wanted to. The fact that the Senate will be back in session when Gonzo leaves and there is a provision that provides for a temporary replacement until confirmation by the Senate.
He's 'screwn' on this one.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:43 AM
Response to Original message |