Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RC: Thinks GONZO rsigning is a BAD THING?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bennyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 08:43 AM
Original message
RC: Thinks GONZO rsigning is a BAD THING?
I do. It is winning a battle for a hill that has nothing to do with the war. He was about to have to answer some very hard questions. Ones that he had NO ANSWER FOR. Ones that would have implicted the Bush crime family in illegal acts.

Now we will have to start all over again. With a AG that is thrice removed for those acts. And there is not time to get the next guy to the point that Gonzo was in the process.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. He would never ever ever ever
have answered wurdyiond implicating bushco, and in case you didn't notice, he's quite capable of lying and dodging questions he has no answer for. Gonzo was a firewall for bushco, perhaps even the keystone. Not to mention that every day the little fucker stayed he did more damage.

couldn't disagree more completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Firewalls are never torn down; they are replaced by something more secure
I don't think we can say whether or not this is a good thing, but I have a very bad feeling about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Not true.
What do you think happened with Nixon?

It would be nigh on impossible to replace Gonzo with someone more secure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. His resignation doesn't shield him from testifying. It actually should strip him
of any claim of executive privilege.

One thing we have to ask ourselves.... with all the high level resignations lately, do you think they have some inside info that Bush is fixing to issue a blanket pardon to them all, just like Poppy did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Libby got away too, I wouldn't put anything past these thugs.
cutting and running perhaps??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PianoBlack Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. I definetly see what your saying....
Edited on Mon Aug-27-07 08:53 AM by PianoBlack
The problem is the questioning was going nowhere anyway. Congress will still go after him now that he is not in office. I can understand why you think it's a bad thing, but I don't agree completely. My question is, why did he resign now? I think that it is a ploy to get the democrats to focus on him instead of focusing on the hill itself. I kinda see it as throwing meat to the dogs in order to get away with as little harm as possible.

Not that we shouldn't go after him...but I think they realized that now that the allegations were on him he was no longer of use to them. He couldn't go get a bite to eat at a local diner without someone breathing down his neck. NOW he is no longer in office, so I am worried about who's next. The Bush Administration has something coming down the pike...I think anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zensea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Some people are never happy
Of course, it's not a bad thing.
Sheesh.
OK, let me rephrase that, compared to him staying in office, it's not a bad thing.
It's good to not have Gonzo as the attorney general.
Sure there are the difficulties you speak of, but so what? There are always difficulties.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC