deacon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-28-07 05:39 AM
Original message |
Chertoff? Why him? Would Dems actually even consider him to be AG? |
|
I don't get it. Why would he even be considered? He has bush crony tattooed on his chest. The idea of confirming him is pushing absurdity to a new level.
|
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-28-07 05:40 AM
Response to Original message |
1. he's a long time sycophant and known toady, that's why |
EST
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-28-07 05:45 AM
Response to Original message |
|
And, yes, unfortunately, there are several democrats that would rubberstamp any bushie nomination. Fortunately fewer now than there used to be, but there ane still liberals who think liberal attitudes should be extended to rapacious, proven enemies of freedom.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message |