Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army to Examine Iraq Contracts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 01:30 AM
Original message
Army to Examine Iraq Contracts
Army to Examine Iraq Contracts
Published: 8/29/07, 12:05 AM EDT
By RICHARD LARDNER

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Army will examine as many as 18,000 contracts awarded over the past four years to support U.S. forces in Iraq to determine how many are tainted by waste, fraud and abuse, service officials said Wednesday.

Overall, the contracts are worth close to $3 billion and represent every transaction made between 2003 and 2007 by a contracting office in Kuwait, which the Army has identified as a significant trouble spot.

In a separate probe, a high-level team led by Pentagon Inspector General Claude Kicklighter will travel to Iraq next week to investigate how U.S. weapons intended for Iraqi security forces ended up being used for murders and other violent crimes in Turkey.

Among the contracts to be reviewed by the Army are awards to former Halliburton subsidiary KBR, which has received billions of dollars since 2001 to be a major provider of food and shelter services to U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Democrats in Congress have claimed that KBR, formerly known as Kellogg, Brown and Root, benefited from ties to Vice President Dick Cheney, who once led Halliburton Co., the Houston-based oil services conglomerate, and congressional Republicans.

http://home.bellsouth.net/s/editorial.dll?bfromind=7816&eeid=5379534&_sitecat=1504&dcatid=0&eetype=article&render=y&ac=3&ck=&ch=ne
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't this a lot like the fox overseeing the chickencoop?
Or, is there still hope?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think there's hope, myself..
The Army looking into the contracts isn't at all like the fox guarding the hen house. Some of these top guys want to know WHY the troops don't have drinking water... or food... or armor. They're pissed off about it and now they want answers. That's my take on it anyways..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. john warner started the ball rolling
and he`s been on the whitehouse hit list ever since--page two explains why
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/28/world/middleeast/28military.html?ex=1345953600&en=3d96ec13b270f221&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
Iraq Weapons Are a Focus of Criminal Investigations - New York Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Interesting...
"But federal officials say the inquiry has moved far beyond the initial investigation of hundreds of thousands of improperly tracked assault rifles and semiautomatic pistols that grew out of Senator Warner’s query. In fact, Senator Warner said in a statement to The New York Times that he was outraged when he was briefed recently on the initial findings of the investigations.

“When I was briefed on the recent developments, I felt so strongly that I asked the Secretary of the Army to brief the Armed Services Committee right away, which he did in early August,” Senator Warner said in a statement."/snip


"That federal agency, the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, responded with a report in October 2006 that found serious discrepancies in American military records of where thousands of the weapons actually ended up. The military did not take the routine step of recording serial numbers for the weapons, the inspector general found, making it difficult to determine whether any of the weapons had ended up in the wrong hands.

In July 2007, the Government Accountability Office found even larger discrepancies, reporting that the American military “cannot fully account for about 110,000 AK-47 rifles, 90,000 pistols, 80 items of body armor, and 115,000 helmets reported as issued to Iraqi security forces as of Sept. 22, 2005.”
{emphasis mine}

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/28/world/middleeast/28military.html?pagewanted=2&ei=5090&en=3d96ec13b270f221&ex=1345953600&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I still think Warner is an old-school Republican,like my dad
My dad hates the * administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. just so you know where Supplementals are directed -- Dems on notice before you approve!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC