Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The Rip-Off In Iraq: You Will Not Believe How Low The War Profiteers Have Gone"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 05:27 AM
Original message
"The Rip-Off In Iraq: You Will Not Believe How Low The War Profiteers Have Gone"
Edited on Thu Aug-30-07 05:38 AM by Hissyspit
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/60950

The Rip-off in Iraq: You Will Not Believe How Low the War Profiteers Have Gone

By Matt Taibbi, RollingStone.com. Posted August 30, 2007.

In Iraq, private contractors are guaranteed huge profits no matter how badly they fuck things up.

How is it done? How do you screw the taxpayer for millions, get away with it and then ride off into the sunset with one middle finger extended, the other wrapped around a chilled martini? Ask Earnest O. Robbins -- he knows all about being a successful contractor in Iraq.

- snip -

A few months later, in March 2004, your company magically wins a contract from the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq to design and build the Baghdad Police College, a facility that's supposed to house and train at least 4,000 police recruits. But two years and $72 million later, you deliver not a functioning police academy but one of the great engineering clusterfucks of all time, a practically useless pile of rubble so badly constructed that its walls and ceilings are literally caked in shit and piss, a result of subpar plumbing in the upper floors.

You've done such a terrible job, in fact, that when auditors from the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction visit the college in the summer of 2006, their report sounds like something out of one of the Saw movies: "We witnessed a light fixture so full of diluted urine and feces that it would not operate," they write, adding that "the urine was so pervasive that it had permanently stained the ceiling tiles" and that "during our visit, a substance dripped from the ceiling onto an assessment team member's shirt." The final report helpfully includes a photo of a sloppy brown splotch on the outstretched arm of the unlucky auditor.

When Congress gets wind of the fiasco, a few members on the House Oversight Committee demand a hearing. To placate them, your company decides to send you to the Hill -- after all, you're a former Air Force major general who used to oversee this kind of contracting operation for the government. So you take your twenty-minute ride in from the suburbs, sit down before the learned gentlemen of the committee and promptly get asked by an irritatingly eager Maryland congressman named Chris Van Hollen how you managed to spend $72 million on a pile of shit.

You blink. Fuck if you know. "I have some conjecture, but that's all it would be" is your deadpan answer.

The room twitters in amazement. It's hard not to applaud the balls of a man who walks into Congress short $72 million in taxpayer money and offers to guess where it all might have gone.

Next thing you know, the congressman is asking you about your company's compensation. Touchy subject -- you've got a "cost-plus" contract, which means you're guaranteed a base-line profit of three percent of your total costs on the deal. The more you spend, the more you make -- and you certainly spent a hell of a lot. But before this milk-faced congressman can even think about suggesting that you give these millions back, you've got to cut him off. "So you won't voluntarily look at this," Van Hollen is mumbling, "and say, given what has happened in this project … "

"No, sir, I will not," you snap.

"… 'We will return the profits.' …"

"No, sir, I will not," you repeat.


Your testimony over, you wait out the rest of the hearing, go home, take a bath in one of your four bathrooms, jump into bed with the little woman… . A year later, Iraq is still in flames, and your president's administration is safely focused on reclaiming $485 million in aid money from a bunch of toothless black survivors of Hurricane Katrina. But the house you bought for $775K is now assessed at $929,974, and you're sure as hell not giving it back to anyone.

"Yeah, I don't know what I expected him to say," Van Hollen says now about the way Robbins responded to being asked to give the money back. "It just shows the contempt they have for us, for the taxpayer, for everything."

Operation Iraqi Freedom, it turns out, was never a war against Saddam Hussein's Iraq. It was an invasion of the federal budget, and no occupying force in history has ever been this efficient. George W. Bush's war in the Mesopotamian desert was an experiment of sorts, a crude first take at his vision of a fully privatized American government. In Iraq the lines between essential government services and for-profit enterprises have been blurred to the point of absurdity -- to the point where wounded soldiers have to pay retail prices for fresh underwear, where modern-day chattel are imported from the Third World at slave wages to peel the potatoes we once assigned to grunts in KP, where private companies are guaranteed huge profits no matter how badly they fuck things up.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, yes I will!
Try me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. What a system! Pirates in expensive suits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. My guess - this is just an appetizer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. "It was an invasion of the federal budget" Yes it was!!
"...a crude first take at his vision of a fully privatized American government"

Yes it was!!

Finally...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gademocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Will these criminals ever face retribution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Its just like the Sopranos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. Privatization: another catastrophic right-wing policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Funny how these "CONservatives" talk about "free trade" when all they are is "Welfare Queens"!
Oh, the ironies of "CONservatives" and NeoCON "free" marketers! They haven't a clue what "free trade" is. All they know how to do is suck on the tit of the U.S. taxpayer.

When are we going to wean these humongous fat obnoxious overgrown infants--U.S.-based global corporate predators and war profiteers?

While they stuff their faces and fatten their Grossnesses at our expense, they whine and snivel about the poor being a drag upon their profits, and invent the myth of the poor black woman, trying to feed her family and keep it together in a cruel and racist society, as a "Queen." No such "Queen" ever existed, but there you go. Piggish predatory capitalist babies the size of Chicago invent many lies to stave off threats to THEIR lifestyle. They are the hogs. They are the "Queens." They are the ones sucking us dry, inventing nothing and patenting everything, paying nothing and using our infrastructure, educating no one and appropriating our brains, contributing nothing, and hording their unearned billions in offshore accounts, and not only draining the lifeblood out of our workforce and our treasury, but going on to suck up the last dime to made from the sick, the elderly, the poor, the hungry, the young, and going further still, and torturing, slaughtering and stealing from the victims of their horrible and greed-driven violence, the people of Iraq.

When are we going to cut off this pustule, this cancer, this albatross on the backs of the American people and the peoples of the world--the great big fat bloodsucking infant of the "military-industrial complex"?

----------------------------------------

Throw Diebold, ES&S and all election theft machines into 'Boston Harbor' NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bos1 Donating Member (997 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. From the beginning I said the prime motivation was war corporation profits
and creating another long term excuse ala the cold war to funnel the money into the war corporations. Even people who were against the war argued with me, said "Oil", "Empire" or "Mistaken Intelligence" etc. But no, it was and is the most straight, simple, lowest, reason: Easy, if very bloody, money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. An outstanding read. Everyone here should read the whole article.
But why set out to write a long, researched article and open it up blaming "white people." It's so fucking stupid. The author almost lost me from the start with such moronic b.s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
12. this article should be sent Special Delivery to every Member of Congress, . . .
every Senator, and every candidate for president, announced or otherwise . . . those who actually take the time to read it (probably very few, but still) might actually change their position about additional war funding . . .

it should also be gotten into the hands of Keith Olbermann and Bill Maher, if it hasn't already . . . also every talking head who pollutes our airwaves and cable lines on a regular basis, from Bow Tie Boy to Tweety . . . wouldn't hurt to send one to Oprah, too . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. will you give it back? IS that what they are asking? How about jail. How about the feds take it ALL
back? People go to jail for so much less.
Why are we still "asking"/ (rhetorical question)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Woody Guthrie was right
"As through this world you ramble,
you see lots of funny men.
Some will rob you with a six-gun,
and some with a fountain pen.

But as through this world you ramble,
and as through this world you roam,
you will never see an outlaw
drive a family from their home."

The Ballad of Pretty Boy Floyd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Support Sen. Webb's Upcoming Fight against these thief's - link
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2007_cr/s1825.html

STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

By Mr. WEBB (for himself, Mrs. McCaskill, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr.
Brown, Mr. Casey, Mr. Tester, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr.
Sanders, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Levin, Mr. Carper, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr.
Kerry, Mr. Johnson, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Obama, Mr. Leahy, Mr.
Harkin, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Dodd, and Ms. Landrieu):

S. 1825. A bill to provide for the study and investigation of wartime
contracts and contracting processes in Operation Iraqi Freedom and
Operation Enduring Freedom, and for other purposes; to the Committee on
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be
printed in the Record.

Therebeing no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be
printed in the Record, as follows:

S. 1825

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Commission on Wartime
Contracting Establishment Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDY AND INVESTIGATION OF WARTIME CONTRACTS AND
CONTRACTING PROCESSES IN OPERATION IRAQI
FREEDOM AND OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM.


:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
17. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC