The Bush admin chickenhawks are
up in arms about a report that gives his surge a
failing grade. According to the AP, the
Pentagon is also disputing parts of the report. Yet, in what Jon Soltz, of VoteVets.org, refers to as a
complete meltdown by the military and Defense Department because of Bush's failed policy in Iraq, the commanders on the ground are
bailing on Bush.
No
thing amount of facts can make Bush and his army of spin doctors acknowledge the reality on the ground. Take this report,
Iraq body count running at double pace (emphasis added):
The findings include:
• Iraq is suffering about double the number of war-related deaths throughout the country compared with last year — an average daily toll of 33 in 2006, and 62 so far this year.
• Nearly 1,000 more people have been killed in violence across Iraq in the first eight months of this year than in all of 2006. So far this year, about 14,800 people have died in war-related attacks and sectarian murders. AP reporting accounted for 13,811 deaths in 2006. The United Nations and other sources placed the 2006 toll far higher.
• Baghdad has gone from representing 76 percent of all civilian and police war-related deaths in Iraq in January to 52 percent in July, bringing it back to the same spot it was roughly a year ago.
_According to the Iraqi Red Crescent Organization, the number of displaced Iraqis has more than doubled since the start of the year, from 447,337 on Jan. 1 to 1.14 million on July 31.
However, Brig. Gen. Richard Sherlock, deputy director for operational planning for the Pentagon's Joint Chiefs of Staff, said violence in Iraq "has continued to decline and is at the lowest level since June 2006."
He offered no statistics to back his claim, but in a briefing with reporters at the Pentagon on Friday he warned insurgents might try intensify attacks in Iraq to coincide with three milestones: the sixth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks in the U.S., the beginning of Ramadan and the report to Congress.
However? Here are some
statistics (from icasualties.org's weekly casualties trends) Gen. Sherlock:
After Declining to 15.5, the Lowest Level Since the End of 2006, the Fatality Trend Line Has Risen above 18 for Two Weeks
A Proposed Benchmark for Evaluating Surge Success Based on the Fatality Trend Line (Blue in the Chart Below):
If the Fatality Trend Line Drops Below 10 for an Extended Period (At Least Ten Weeks; A Pattern Not Seen Since the 2003 Occupation), and
If it is Accompanied by a Parallel Reduction in Iraqi Deaths (to the early 2005 level of less than 100 Per Week, Down from 300-400 Now - See US vs Iraqi Fatalities tab),
Then the Surge will Have Achieved a Substantive Measure of Initial Success.
There are
electricity and
water shortages and the Trigress River is a
graveyard. There is
death,
disease and
displacement, compounded by
chaos and
rampant corruption. Obviously, Bush doesn't know
who the hell he's sending the troops to Iraq to fight, and isn't even sure which
decade he is in. Being AWOL does that to a person. It isn't clear to Bush that he cannot win the hearts and minds of people whose kids are being
imprisoned and
maimed.
To the those of you who follow Bush around like
flies swarming to dung, get a clue: If the
facts on the ground supported his claim that the surge is working, there would be no need for him to send an
army of cronies to spew $15 million worth of propaganda. There is still time to regain your integrity. Consider the facts.
U.S. troop
fatalities in August over the four plus years of Bush's war:
2003:
352004:
66, an 89% increase over previous year.
2005:
85, a 29% increase over previous year (21 soldiers killed in Anbar on the first (7) and third (14) days of the month).
2006:
65, a 24% decrease over previous year.
2007:
77, an 18% increase over previous year.
The number of fatalities for the first eight months of this year is up more than 58%, from 462 in 2006 to 732 in 2007. That's 58%!
The
average number of Iraqis killed monthly in 2007 is up 500 from 2006, and is up by more than 140 over the previous eight months.
In May 2006, a Council on Foreign Relations article described the U.S. efforts to rebuild Iraq as a
reconstruction abyss.
In April 2007, CNN
reported:
In addition, 914 people -- including 224 U.S. citizens -- have died while working on the U.S.-funded projects, the report said.
The U.S. is spending $37 billion on Iraqi reconstruction.
The report said a major problem was the Iraqi government's lack of maintenance plans for the facilities after it has taken over control from the U.S.
For example, just 10 of the 17 electrical generators installed at a cost of almost $12 million at the Baghdad International Airport were operational. There was no plan for their maintenance, including keeping oil levels up, the report said.
Expensive generators were missing from the Camp Ur military base, having been hauled off to another post, the report said. Also at Camp Ur, three modular buildings constructed at a cost of $1.8 million were dismantled and removed with no explanation given.
Barracks renovated for enlisted soldiers were already in disrepair just a year after being handed over to the Iraqi Army, the inspector general said.
Even the officers and troops on the ground are complaining about
waste.
Then there is this from
Rolling Stone:
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the story of the Iraq War in a nutshell. In the history of balls, the world has never seen anything like the private contractors George W. Bush summoned to serve in Operation Iraqi Freedom. Collectively, they are the final, polished result of 231 years of natural selection in the crucible of American capitalism: a bureaucrat class capable of stealing the same dollar twice -- once from the taxpayer and once from a veteran in a wheelchair.
According to the most reliable estimates, we have doled out more than $500 billion for the war, as well as $44 billion for the Iraqi reconstruction effort. And what did America's contractors give us for that money? They built big steaming shit piles, set brand-new trucks on fire, drove back and forth across the desert for no reason at all and dumped bags of nails in ditches. For the most part, nobody at home cared, because war on some level is always a waste…
This post at
Welcome to Pottersville blog sums up the entire immoral endeavor:
This story encompasses in a big greasy nutshell much of the callous avarice openly endorsed and even protected by the Bush administration which, when superimposed over the murderous, bloody quagmire of Iraq, makes that country look like a monstrous hybrid of the most nightmarish paintings by Hieronymus Bosch and the inflammatory greed-exposing cartoons of Thomas Nast.
And through it all, the media echoes the steady beat of Bush's propaganda:
2005Jan.:
Bush Urges Patience on Iraq as Election NearsJun.:
Bush urges patience, long view on Iraq warAug.:
Bush calls for patience on Iraq missionNov.:
Bush Urges Patience With Iraq Training2006Mar.:
Bush calls on Americans to show patience with IraqJun.:
After Iraq Visit, Bush Urges PatienceAug.:
Bush Urges Patience on Iraq, Speed in LebanonOct.:
Conceding Missteps, Bush Urges Patience on IraqNov.:
Bush Urges Patience on Winning Iraq War2007Mar:
Bush Pleads for Patience in Iraq WarMay:
Bush Urges Patience on IraqJun.:
Bush urges patience on IraqJul.:
War In Year 5; Bush Requests PatienceAug.:
Bush pleads for more patience for Iraq war effortsTime to kill the spin and end the war!edited wrong word and delete "to"