Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At the risk of offending the gay community...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 12:46 PM
Original message
At the risk of offending the gay community...
Edited on Sat Sep-01-07 12:48 PM by lynyrd_skynyrd
It is not at all impossible that Larry Craig is gay. Actually, it's quite probable, and also completely irrelevant. I don't think there is a problem with pointing this out, but I do understand why it can be somewhat of a sore spot for all the oppressed and vilified homosexuals who have to put up with being labeled "sexual deviants" by the likes of people like Craig himself.

However, a sexual orientation is a sexual orientation, nothing more and nothing less. You can't call Craig a "predator" or a "pervert" and say he has no sexual orientation. Everybody has a sexual orientation. There are straight pedophiles, there are gay pedophiles, there are bisexual pedophiles. There are straight people who solicit sex in bathroom stalls, gay people who solicit sex in bathroom stalls, and bisexual people who solicit sex in bathroom stalls. Straight rapists, gay rapists, bisexual rapists. Etc.

I understand why there are some here who hate to associate Craig with "gay", but it doesn't change the facts. He probably is gay. The position we all ought to be taking here is that his orientation has precisely zero relevance to any illegal activities he may or may not have committed, with the exception of his blatant hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. More likely that he's bi, isn't it?..
The clue being the fact that he is married.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I Contend That Marriage Is A Sham And Has Never Been Consummated
I have a new term- confusedsexual or deniedsexual-he does not know or rejects his true sexual identity...

JMO...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Agreed
Literally *everything* I have learned about him and what he did at the airport points to him being gay--not bisexual. There are tons of bisexual married-with-kids men out there, but he ain't one 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. My Best Friend When I Was Younger Was Bisexual
He dated men, women and transgendered females and was comfortable with all of them... I submit Craig is only truly comfortable with the former...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I believe that he married and adopted her three children shortly
after the 1982 scandal. He was the one member of Congress to come out to deny being involved, suggesting that being the rare "single" member of Congress made him a target.

With that bit of the picture, I'm not sure I would assume anything with respect to the marriage.. or what it says about his sexual orientation. If the marriage was entered solely in order to help him remain deeply closeted, I would say that is very sad. However, that would not necessarily mean that both parties could not benefit from the partnership, however non-traditional...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yeah
Edited on Sat Sep-01-07 01:26 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
You can have a marriage without sex I guess... My thesis is more aimed at Craig's true sexual identification or lack thereof...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarryNite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Yup,
his marriage was just to cover his ass, so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canetoad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. So was Elton John
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Elton John Would Say He Was Truly Attracted To Women At One Time
I don't think that's the case with Craig...

It seemed he married out of political expedience; shortly after rumors about him being gay circulated...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. There are some people for whom being "gay"
(however that is defined) is not an either-or proposition. Perhaps Craig falls in that category.

And, personally, I'm a little confused about what is/was "lewd" and why, short of assault, "we" are prosecuting it.

When I was younger, men used to say all sorts of things to me and, though I did not like it, I handled it myself, by ignoring them. There are probably some situations that are much worse than what I experienced, but we need to be careful about making that distinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. I suspect it's not unusual for self-described 'straight' guys ...
... to accept or even SEEK fellatio FROM other guys - strangers - while, at the same time, they'd be disgusted at GIVING fellatio. I personally regard that as a compulsion warranting some kind of counseling or intervention.

The neoconservative right seems to ATTRACT people with such superior/subordinate attitudes toward their fellow human beings - attitudes that subordinate others to mere objects for one's own gratification.

I think it's a gross disservice to both GLBT and straight to associate such objectification of others to one's own gratification with a sexual orientation. Sexual orientation is irrelevant - even if the right and the media flood us with such an association.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I Suspect Craig Was The Fellatrix
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Oh come on...
"Fellatrix" would be a female. He was the fellator. :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I Didn't Know It Was Gender Specific...
I do believe he was the one giving head...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Yes...
Like "dominatrix" is a woman who 'gives' S&M, or "executrix" (rarely used) is a woman in charge of executing a will. I think it's a Latin thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. You Are Correct Sir...
I submit if a straight man wants a blowjob, even an anonymous one, he's going to find a female prostitute...He's not going to go to the trouble Senator Craig did to get one from a male...

He's probably more asexual than anything... I don't think he has had much sex , except maybe for the solo kind, with all the restrictions he placed on himself , and the environmental barriers that prevented him from getting the sex he wanted...

He was just born in a wrong place and meliu...

It's a story that's probably been played out many, many times...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. i really like how you tie "objectivification" to this -- that's how I see it,
but i had not gone that far -- focusing on his use of power after the arrest. i think that's a really sophisticated reading.

and -- ewww.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That Was Tahiti...
I would suspect being the recipient of oral sex from a man and a woman isn't that much different... If all Craig wanted was oral sex he could easily have found a female prostitute and that would have come with a much smaller chance of detection and embarrassment...And even if he was discovered there wouldn't be the brouhaha for getting arrested soliciting sex in a public restroom... I don't think he would have went to such lengths just to get "oral"...

Also, I don't think it was a power thing with Craig... As I said up thread I don't think his marraiage has ever been consummated and his sexual identification is beyond identification...

Just my spin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Oh, I'd guess it's a "power thing" ... AND a "sex=dirty" thing.
Many of us 'discover' sex in the hood on the sly ... and, in our formative, adolescent minds, begin to associate sexual activities with something taboo and "dirty." Hopefully, maturity and healthy emotional development leaves such associations behind and we make the connections with love, trust, mutual respect, and (most important, imho) emotional intimacy. The vestigial connections with the taboo and secretive evolve into what I'd call 'playful' and 'child-like' aspects - 'spice' - in the most hopefully fullest maturity. IMHO.

In many folks, however, as in all emotional and psychological development, some quirks and twists may be more pronounced and - in the more pathological cases - malicious, angry, and self-loathing aspects grow. Tumors in the psyche. Craig is, I'd say, quite twisted. He's just no decent representative of sexual orientation - of any kind, imho. He's about USING others ... not about loving others. He's about deceit and prevarication - not about honesty and trust.

Just my view. ;shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I Concur
I would just add that with all the restrictions he placed on himself and the environmental barriers I don't think he has had much sex with others at all... He's a psychoanalysts' dream...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Good points...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. You're right
It's not at all unusual. Not. at. all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. i think you are correct -- the two are confused in the hypocrisy portion of this scandal
Edited on Sat Sep-01-07 01:11 PM by nashville_brook
the tape recording of his arrest is the worst part of the whole affair for me. caught red-handed, he depends on his status as "powerful senator" to obliquely intimidate the arresting officer (providing his business card as ID and saying "what do you think of that"). was the officer supposed to shudder in his boots and apologize? Craig comported himself like a dictatorial party boss, not subject to same laws as the rest of us.

whether or not he's closeted or cruises bathrooms for sex is not nearly as troubling as his misuse of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. Apparently that card has worked well for him in other situations. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. I couldn't care less what his sexual orientation is.
He is a completely repugnant person.

His very public anti-gay stance is completely repugnant. Whether it is also hypocritical is up for debate.

I've never liked the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. I agree. His public and rabid anti-gay stance is
reason enough to despise him.


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. Gay, straight, bi, or N/A does not matter to me.
Edited on Sat Sep-01-07 01:46 PM by LostInAnomie
What matters to me is that he actively sought out the same behavior that he and his ilk have deemed deviant, abhorrent, unnatural, perverse, etc. and sought to demonize and prohibit at every turn. That make him a hypocrite, and I am glad his career is ruined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
28. Don't know and don't care
The issue to me is not whether Craig enjoys a tumble with men on occasion. I'm bisexual and I enjoy a tumble with guys sometimes (with the full blessing of my female partner). To me, the issue isn't him getting it on in a public restroom either, except to the extent that is a crime. Not my thing but hope it works out for you. The problem is the hypocracy.

I'm British. In British government, we have had swindlers, pederasts, con-artists of every type, the well-meaning but stupid and the clever but evil. The one thing we cannot stand above all else is a hypocrite (probably because we've so often been guilty of it as a nation).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC