Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

this story just posted on yahoo news-"Iran running 3000 centrifuges"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 02:56 PM
Original message
this story just posted on yahoo news-"Iran running 3000 centrifuges"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070902/wl_nm/iran_nuclear_centrifuges_dc_3;_ylt=Apf9j1Y7LETKZcYGRpleE850WnwV
TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran is running more than 3,000 centrifuges used to enrich uranium and is installing more every week, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Sunday, in comments likely to fuel Western fears Tehran is seeking an atomic bomb.

Western experts say 3,000 machines running smoothly for long periods at supersonic speeds could make enough enriched uranium for an atomic bomb in about a year, if Iran wanted, and form the basis for "industrial-scale" production of nuclear fuel.


I don't know what to believe anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. And So It Begins???
As promised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. and so it goes.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. didn't the IAEA just say that something like that wasn't the case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. YES THEY DID. THIS IS A LIE.
Sorry to yell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PearliePoo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. yes it is.
Just like WMDs and mushroom clouds. Now the idiot has labeled Iraq's Army as terrorists.
Guess he figures that label gives him free reign to drop bombs on anyone.
The Decider is ratcheting up the rhetoric, beating the drums and the worthless media isn't asking any questions.
My nephew is on his THIRD tour of Afghanistan and he is in the NAVY!
He usually is on carriers running aircraft maintenance. If he writes me that he is being transferred back onto a ship, I'll take that as a huge clue that the shit is hitting the fan.
He is supposed to be home in 90 days and then he's getting OUT.
Impeach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. apparently,that isn't the rhetoric Bush wants to hear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Here's what the IAEA said:
PARIS, Aug. 30 -- The United Nations nuclear watchdog agency gave an upbeat assessment of Iranian cooperation with international inspectors in a new report Thursday that could make it more difficult for the United States to win tougher U.N. sanctions against Iran.

The report by the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna also concluded that while Iran continues to enrich uranium in violation of U.N. Security Council resolutions, its fuel enrichment plant has produced "well below the expected quantity for a facility of this design." The quality of the uranium also was lower than expected, the IAEA said.


<snip>

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR2007083000460.html?hpid=sec-world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. so...did Ahmadinejad really say this,or is it manufactured?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Really say what?
Iran has denied that this development is for anything other than peaceful means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. YES they DID.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is Judy Miller writing again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Any nation that has been threatened by outside forces, and having
seen what happened to Baghdad/Iraq would seek some sort of deterrent so they don't end up the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
10.  is karl writing for reuters now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. 3000 Centrifuges would make a good band name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. "By November, or December at the latest,
we should be able to see whether the Iranians are sticking to their promises. If they fail to do this, Tehran would be missing a great chance -- perhaps its last," ElBaradei said.

So, November or December, eh? I don't think so. If an Iran attack comes, I think it will be sooner than that. Failing sooner, then that's about right I guess. Seems they would want as much time post-attack to nurture their master plan of privitizing and oil siezure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. how many centrifuges does the US have? I mean, 3,000 sounds so unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. CNN put it up some time ago as breaking news...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. Of course they did- they're the standard bearer for yellow journalism
or at least, they like to think they are. Their American versions are actually little more than tabloids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. Sounds like saber-rattling to me
Tehran wants to be the strongman so badly that I think they lie just to make everyone take them seriously. Saddam did the same thing. I say we ignore them for awhile and see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. This guy is their George.
He's basically yelling "Bomb me!"

Which could be considered the equivalent to "Bring it on."

My deep sympathies to the Iranian people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. USEC American Centrifuge Plant
In Paducah KY. IIRC, there are different centrifuges for power and bomb uranium. That was the dispute about the Iraqi centrifuges, again, IIRC.

http://www.usec.com/v2001_02/HTML/Aboutusec_centrifuge.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. My concern is that this story will be construed like these:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. That's just Ahmadinejad blowing smoke
up Duba's butt.

The article goes on to say:

But an International Atomic Energy Agency report issued on Friday said Iran remained well short of 3,000 centrifuges and that its rate of enrichment was still far below capacity.

The report also indicated the pace of centrifuge installation had slowed markedly since April, when Ahmadinejad first announced "industrial" capacity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
23.  Here's what troubles me about this entire issue .
There is all the talk about Iran building up nuclear power whether it is believed to be for a power source or a bomb . Ok , what is to keep Iran from acquiring a bomb from any number of countries , for all we know they may already have a few .

This is not to say I agree with bombing Iran it is only meant to put out all possibilities and to simple ask why all the focus is on Irans effort to build a bomb of their own .

I already have the sinking feeling that there will be an attack on Iran based on bushs speech last week and the many articals by reliable sources that only seem to increase this talk rather than discount it as simply conspiracy theory .

I also don't think this pending attack depends on the election time slot , what purpose would this serve , bush or cheney don't care about polls or elections in 2008 . And if this is to keep bush in power then there is no reason to wait they can do this anytime and for all we know the day may be already set .

How much do we really know , there will be no warning to the public , it will just happen like 9/11 .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. That's my concern-the facts are being twisted to justify nuking Iran
since we don't have the troops to actually fight over there,and "complete the mission" in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
26.  I tend to feel that
With all I've read and what we have seen even here in New Orleans that lives mean nothing to this admin . I doubt the number 1500 is even a true number of deaths in New Orleans . I doubt the true number of troops deaths in Iraq are real .

It seems apparent that death is not the issue of ths crime family and the lives of people in Iran or the result of an attack on Iran will have on the troops in Iraq means anything to these freaks and war mongers .

They seem very willing to sacrifice whatever it takes to promote their corporate interests .

I doubt one cent of the last war funding went to Iraq for reconstruction or troop supplies , i think it's all for the Iran attack . Otherwise the troops would have what they need by now , it's not a production issue as we are told that's just another lie . what checks and balances are there in place to account for where this money is going ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. This is sure is a good thing Iran is cooperating with the IAEA
I doubt that it will matter though, because the popular "truthiness" is that Ahmahdinejad just can't wait to fire a short-range nuke at Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, and give a couple of more to Al-Qaeda so they can vaporize New York City.

VIENNA, Austria - The International Atomic Energy Agency on Thursday reported "significant" cooperation from Iran with its nuclear probe and noted that Tehran had slowed uranium enrichment - assessments that could hamper U.S. hopes for new U.N. sanctions.

Iran said the report proved it was the target of unfair U.S. attacks. But Washington and its allies said it did not change the need for more U.N. Security Council penalties.

IAEA Deputy Director-General Olli Heinonen highlighted the importance of Tehran's cooperation, noting that its past stonewalling had triggered Security Council sanctions in the first place. But he cautioned that Iran still needed to prove it would abide by its commitments.

<snip>

Repeating the findings of the Iran-IAEA cooperation plan, the report - to be considered by the 35-nation IAEA board at a meeting starting Sept. 10 - said the agency felt that information provided by Iran on past small-scale plutonium experiments had "resolved" agency concerns about the issue.

<more>

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/08/30/ap4069796.html


Making weapons-grade uranium-235 is a matter of time. The centrifuges can make a lot of U235 enriched to only 10% and use it in nuclear power plants, or they can make a little of U235 enriched to 90%, suitable for a nuclear bomb.

It's like a distillary: Any single plant can make a lot of 80-proof vodka or a little of 160-proof Everclear. It depends on how many times you process it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. It's a conundrum.
Do we believe El-Baradei's report, based on what cooperation's been extended to the IAEA?

Or do we believe Ahmedinejad's statements, based on what cooperation's been extended to his government?

Elbaradei wants to avoid confrontation; he'll play down anything he can. Ahmedinejad wants to play up confrontation; he'll exaggerate anything he can. On the other hand, just because that's what we could expect doesn't mean that's what we can assume is the case. It's quite possible for the truth to be told, no down-playing or exaggerating involved.

The scientists may want to not exacerbate things. They may be completely forthcoming to the IAEA but not quite honest to their superiors ... an old ruse to cover their butts and work in accordance with their own conscience or out of fear. Or ... they may be completely forthcoming with their government, in accordance with their conscience and duties, but not be quite honest with nosey outsiders.

Give me a side to argue for, and I can do it.

Even the numbers of centrifuges in operation differ. Elbaradei ... 2k, with 650 or so in progress; Ahmedinejad, 3k up and running. You'd think they'd be able to at least agree on how to count. But, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. A thousand points of hype
Der New World Order goosesteps onward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. Bomb, bomb, bomb.... bomb, bomb Iran.... You gotta love warmongers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. PROPAGANDA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC