Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP=Self Interest.....DEM Party=Common Good...its so simple but overlooked/

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 08:45 AM
Original message
GOP=Self Interest.....DEM Party=Common Good...its so simple but overlooked/
glossed over by the Pubs/media

The GOP likes to fight on the base level of Individuals....but skips what they do when in power....which is not in the common interest for the peeps....

If the focus centers around the Common Good and what is Best for the Nation...the Pubs lose everytime.....

The GOP has a horrible record these past 7 years....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's the message that needs to be clearly made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not overlooked. Just not pushed by Dem candidates
Edwards and Kucinich push it, but the press does not highlight that issue. Obama and Clinton don't feel it is an important enough issue to push. I expect they don't want to alienate their lobbyists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Republicans and the right wing have convinced,,,
a large number of American people that programs and laws that benefit the vast majority of Americans are only being enjoyed by a few "welfare queens,' "minorities," and "homesexuals." The right wingers have played on the fears and prejudices that many Americans have about people who are not exactly like themselves and converted it into anger and hatred about the programs and tax policies and protections that came out of the New Deal era and the civil rights revolution of the 1960s. And the motivation of the oligarchs who promulgated and pushed and financed the propaganga was for unlimited power and wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Should we have a mission to "UNCONVINCE" the peeps??? I think its imperative
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. I disagree. Both parties say they are for the individual/common good in
different ways.

I personally don't find running as "the party of the common good over the individual" appealing. The individual is the smallest minority. I also don't see it as attractive to most voters.

I'd prefer to be the party that stands for equal rights for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, Equal Rights, equal ops, free education thru college, free health care, freedom from the PUB
BS and LIES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I agree. I would also add that the idea
of the "common good" taken to the extreme is frightening. It is the "common good" that is used to snuff individual initiative and control every aspect of life in societies that have no sense of individual rights or choice. Who gets to define what, exactly, constitutes the "common good"? For example, if it is deemed that the common good is served by increasing population, will women be forced to get pregnant? If the common good requires a decrease in population, will all families be limited to one child as in China?

Our society has been more of a "mixed economy" where individual rights are the basis, but government is used to control the worst aspects of rampant individualism. There is a trade off between individual and collective choice and every time individual choice is to be limited, there should be an elaborate legislative process where all sides can weigh in on the costs and benefits before such action is taken.

It is dangerous to simplify this enormous issue in such a way. It is much too easy to then say that dems are really closeted communists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Lets use Common Sense then...what works best w/o violating individual rights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. that idea is, we hope, what we as a nation have tried to
do. It is true that republicans and libertarians tend to ignore the idea of common good altogether and always couch their arguments in terms of individual rights--but traditional old time republicans did have some sense of community and common good. It was Nixon, after all, who enacted some of our first environmental legislation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think
Edited on Mon Sep-03-07 11:56 AM by JustAnotherGen
It needs to be pushed at the 'lowest level'. By that, a Mad Mom in a Minivan in Mid-West America who has been conned into believing that the Reps. have her best interests at heart needs to be drilled with the following questions:

1. How much do you pay for a gallon of gas compared to 8 years ago?
2. How are you handling the cost of a gallon of milk?
3. How do you explain the funding or lack thereof for your child's education due to NCLB?
4. Do you really feel 'safer' with Bush in office? Is that why one of your compadres got off a plane because 'middle eastern looking men' were on it?
5. What if what happened in N.O. happened to you? Would you still be okay with $500 billion being spent to fight the war in Iraq - and $44 billion on reconstruction?
6. Does your dollar in general go as far as it did 8 years ago?
7. How do you squeeze health care into your budget?
8. What's your mortgage interest rate?
9. Does your husband have job security?
10. Winter is coming . . . are you prepared to pay your energy bills?


I don't mean to be 'demeaning' to these people - but the reality is . . . they don't read anything other that US Weekly, People Magazine, and Family Circle . . . not exactly bastions of political and philosophical thought. Make sense?

We have to bring the discussion down to their level in a non-threatening and non-patronizing way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Wine and beer, ribs and Lobsters, flowers too, and a LUAU..good post...
Those are very realistic questions to ask....

The Pubs would be suffering from tetanus...lock jaw...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The thing is
opihimoimoi . . .

I don't think there's a single candidate vying to win the Republican Candidate nomination that can ask these questions with a straight face. Maybe . . . maaaaaaaaaaaybe Huckabee can.

But then we come back with -

Is it more important that your child pray in school? Or that they be able to score high on the SAT? And then we ask - "Oh, BTW - how do you intend to send your children to college? Is a four year university a realistic expectation for your child? How do they intend to pay off their student loans? Do you realize they may graduate 80K in debt? And there's no guarantee that a well-paying job will exist for them to pay off that debt?"

I know - my logic is a bit 'circular' - but these people need to be spoken to where 'they live'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Most peeps are on the base level....they canarldy think beyond the nx paycheck
and after a 12 pack of beer....Most...not all...

Thus, most are not astute and easy prey for :::

The scammer Pubs who come to steal their minds with BS...


The Dems come with Torches of Truth, Reason, Sanity, Reality, and Common Good....
They must overcome Fantasy that holds the Pub Forces together
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Liberal= Generous, Conservative= Stingy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. As it turns out....evidence is all around us to see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Democrats need better writers -- which shouldn't be so hard
to get because most good writers are LIBERALS. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I concur.....WHERE ARE THE WRITERS?......???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC