Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'L.A. Times' Defies KBR, Publishes Probe on Deaths of Truckers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 09:07 AM
Original message
'L.A. Times' Defies KBR, Publishes Probe on Deaths of Truckers
Editor&Publisher/AP: 'L.A. Times' Defies KBR, Publishes Probe on Deaths of Truckers
Published: September 03, 2007

LOS ANGELES Senior managers for defense contractor KBR Inc. (KBR) rejected the advice of their own security advisers in April 2004, ordering their truck drivers to speed through a five-mile combat zone in Iraq to deliver jet fuel to the U.S. military, according to a newspaper investigation. At least six civilian drivers and two U.S. soldiers died following that decision, raising anew questions about the military's reliance on civilian contractors in war zones.

The families and some survivors of the doomed convoy are suing the Houston- based company and are requesting a federal investigation of KBR's role in the incident. The Los Angeles Times reviewed emails cited in a May 22 letter the plaintiffs' lawyers sent to the U.S. Justice Department. The newspaper also interviewed KBR truck drivers and former military officials and reviewed internal memos, emails, court-sealed depositions and a U.S. Army report about the deaths.

KBR attorneys and company officials declined to comment to the Los Angeles Times and requested the newspaper "refrain from publishing" the material under court seal....

***

Documents show that on April 8, 2004, a day before the deadly attacks, KBR's security advisers were united in telling their bosses to suspend convoys. One KBR driver had died and 70 more had been attacked that day....

But documents indicate those concerns ran counter to the wishes of top officials at KBR, which today is a separate company but then was a subsidiary of Halliburton Co., the company once run by U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney. They were under pressure to fulfill KBR's multibillion dollar contract with its top customer, the U.S. Army, according to the newspaper....

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003634296
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. is this the first crack in the corpofascist facade that has protected the
inner workings in Iraq, the Pentagon, and the White House?

I hope so, for it is long overdue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. "War is profitable" - Republicon homelander mercenary cronies
"We republicon homelanders can always make a buck off of a war, smirk"

- republicon homelander mercenary cronies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Needless to say, none of the decision-makers rode in the trucks themselves
Just like George W himself never saw combat and walked away when his light stateside duties became inconvenient. For these guys, other people's deaths just don't register as important, especially if they might bring in some profits. To me, that's a form of sociopathy. No conscience, only cunning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bperci108 Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. This article also illustrates...
...the gray area (in terms of legal jurisdiction) that these "contractors" work under:

"Families of the dead truck drivers sued KBR in 2005. Last September, U.S. District Judge Gray H. Miller dismissed the lawsuit, saying courts have no jurisdiction over cases involving military orders. Deciding the case would require "the court to examine the policies of the executive branch during wartime, a step the court declines to take," Miller wrote.

The families' lawyers have appealed, arguing KBR has authority over the civilian truck drivers it employs."


In this case it seems obvious to me that the families should be able to sue because KBR is and was a private entity. It's amazing to me how twisted it all gets. Arguing that families cannot sue because this was a "military" action -- this, after all of the religion of privatization that has been shoved down our throats. So it's good to privatize everything, because as we all know, Government Is Bad -- but then, when the private organization gets in a little bit of trouble, well then it's time to hide behind the veil of the military. Neat trick. And as usual, it works to the advantage of secrecy for powerful corporate interests, and against openness and justice for ordinary US citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stephinrome Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. La Times "defies" KBR?!?!
That says much about the state of the free press in the U.S.

Steph
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC