Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush can't recall why Iraqi Army disbanded" (actual title - LA Times)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:40 PM
Original message
Bush can't recall why Iraqi Army disbanded" (actual title - LA Times)
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/iraq/complete/la-na-bush3sep03,0,7983117.story

Draper pressed Bush to explain why, if he wanted to maintain the army, his chief administrator for Iraq, L. Paul Bremer III, issued an order in May 2003 disbanding the 400,000-strong army without pay.

"Yeah, I can't remember; I'm sure I said, 'This is the policy, what happened?' " Bush said, adding: "Again, Hadley's got notes on all this stuff" -- a reference to national security advisor Stephen J. Hadley.

Spokesmen for the White House and former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld declined to comment about the excerpts Sunday. Bremer could not be reached for comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Edgeoforever Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. One cannot remember what one never knew....
By the same rule, he made NO mistakes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey come on! I mean who can remember all the times they disbanded an army??
Edited on Tue Sep-04-07 12:43 PM by underpants
I mean REALLY!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You're correct, I cannot remember the last time I disbanded an army
it's normal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Tell me about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpongeBob Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. If I had a nickel for every time I forgot I disbanded an army....
I could get myself 5 shinny penies.:+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. !
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Convenient memory loss just like the rest of the re-thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush's bosses gave him a little time off during that time
a post-Mission-Accomplished recess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemeupwhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Details, smeetails. What I wanna know is what
Edited on Tue Sep-04-07 12:48 PM by wakemeupwhenitsover
dumbya was eating during this part of the interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. yea, god forbid our president remember something relating to life & death
bullshit junior, utter bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Plausible Deniability is their Answer for EVERYTHING.
Edited on Tue Sep-04-07 12:53 PM by patrice
And then they preach to others about Responsibility! :puke:

Is it any wonder the Young of this country are fundamentally confused?!?!? AND depressed!! = Hypocrisy strikes at the heart of our ability to survive! - and - Hypocrisy is omnipresent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is the kind of brilliant excuses & explanations we're only beginning
to hear from this pinhead in his bizzare attempt to save his "legacy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. First, I don't buy it. But even if it were true...
it'd be proof of utter incompetence on a level that should demand impeachment.

Disbanding the Iraqi army was a monumental and moronic error, and just everyone could see it *at the time*. Everyone I talked to knew that this move was going to create an insurgency.

For Bush to know about it and sanction it would make him a colossal idiot, but to not even remember the decision-- to ascribe such little import to it that he could forget about it-- well, that's so far beyond the pale that I can't even categorize it. Impeach this fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Oh, I buy it. And agree on the monumental incompetence - but we already knew that
he knew that - he complained enough in the debate with Kerry that presidenting was "hard work" and we know how much the "vacationing" president loves working!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. The NYT has Bremmer given permission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Link?
Edited on Tue Sep-04-07 01:02 PM by patrice
Please?

Bremmer given permission by el Residentay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I don't think he was "given permission"
I think Shrub told Bremer to do it. It was full of Baathists--as you'd expect, since Saddam was keen on political patronage and made EVERYONE in the Iraqi government join the Ba'ath Party.

How the hell are you going to de-Baathify if the people with the keys to the arms rooms of Iraq are all Baathists? Unfortunately, Home Depot of Baghdad seems to have made plan that week selling copies of keys to arms rooms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Well, maybe *'s lips were moving, but Rummy&PNAC were talking - so...
no wonder he can't recall...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. I wonder how much that decision was rooted in projection-- or a sort of
Edited on Tue Sep-04-07 01:26 PM by Marr
assumption on Bush's part that the Baath party functioned like the Republican Party. I wonder if he assumed they were political partisans that would put party loyalty before all else, and therefore had to be removed?

I wonder if this move was, at it's core, rooted in that famous Bush oblivious elitism, like when his father stood amazed by the laser scanner in the checkout line? Perhaps he simply could not imagine people joining a political party out of simple necessity, rather than a quest for power or devotion to some exclusive club.

I do think it reeks of Bush Jr.'s infamously insipid, dualist thought process. Good/evil, black/white, etc. He perceived the Iraqi society in his usual binary way, and just instinctively set out to 'purge to evildoers'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. The NYT article is here
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/02/washington/?_r=1&oref=slogin
but their server is out. The paragraph I saved earlier:

"But when Mr. Draper pointed out that Mr. Bush’s former Iraq
administrator, L. Paul Bremer III, had gone ahead and forced the army’s
dissolution
and then asked Mr. Bush how he reacted to that, Mr. Bush
said, “Yeah, I can’t remember, I’m sure I said, ‘This is the policy,
what happened?’ ” But, he added, “Again, Hadley’s got notes on all of
this stuff,” referring to Stephen J. Hadley, his national security
adviser."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. Better link for NYT:
Edited on Tue Sep-04-07 02:07 PM by The Count
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Whatever the nuance, this is a CIC decision - and bush insisted he be the ONLY CIC
(before that, a theater of operation was lead by a CIC - i.e Wes Clark was the CIC in Bosnia). But W wanted to be the one and only, and Bremmer cannot be blamed for these kinds of decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Commander-in-chief was a fairly common title pre-Bush
The Navy had a handful of CINCs, the Army had some, probably the Air Force had a few. Shrub changed them all to "combatant commanders."

First thing the next president needs to do to the military is ditch that asinine term and return our CINCs to being CINCs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. But first, let * take all responsibility for the decisions made in his *unique* name
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Let's just use the "Saddam" solution
Someone posted a thread on here earlier this morning about the Iraqis dropping all charges against Saddam...you know, now that he's in a hole in the ground and all.

Which would be a good thing to do with Bush. We try him on the million Iraqis who are dead but shouldn't be thanks to him. We string his worthless ass up. We send videos around the world to prove we did it. And then we drop the charges for all the other malfeasance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. I ACTUALLY WANT THE CHARGES AND NOT THE STRING.
I want the record set straight - so he won't have to worry about "history"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. Typical dry drunk
CRS disease -or- is it something more sinister?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
17.  'This is the policy, what happened?' Bush said
That about says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Is it just me, or has he taken a noticeable change for the worse
without KR behind him?

Seems as though Bush's discummbobulation has shifted gears since Rove's departure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
37. Sounds like his earpiece stopped working when Rove left
Hmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Ected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. Won't Hear Sean or Rush Talking About THIS Today
Not in the middle of their year-and-a-half diatribe against Hillary Clinton.

How CAN those bastards read these kind of things from their own 'leader', and still feel the need to bash Democrats first and foremost?

They must really, really hate this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. They might not hate the country. They just love money more.
They are completely selfish and I would guess they are apathetic when it comes to the best interests of the Nation.

It's all about ME!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Ected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Sean and Rush Don't Recognize Such Nuances
Why should I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. Remember Condi on Meet the Press
How did the 16 words get back into the President's speech?

Well Tim, we just forgot. There was a lot going on that week and we just forgot that there was a huge lie in the President's speech. Next question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. And then MWO unearthed the pic of W scribbling on the speech, glasses on
and it was even shown in congress at one point. Not that Timmy or anyone else reported on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
29. My "God" if that doesn't produce shock-waves in the Military,
they are deaf, dumb, and blind, and all of that stuff about really caring about one another, is BS, BuShit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VaYallaDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. Maybe he thought the question was about disarming a bandit??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
34.  "Dead Certain"
Bush can't be bothered with details; he's buy with larger concepts, like freedom and stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. I thought it was a good title too
W doesn't come in contact with reality very often - and when he does, we usually don't hear about how it went.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electprogdems Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
36. up to a million dead in Iraq
one to two million displaced inside, a million displaced outside -- and Bush says this

"Yeah, I can't remember; I'm sure I said, 'This is the policy, what happened?' " Bush said, adding: "Again, Hadley's got notes on all this stuff"

OMFG

I think i am going to puke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
38. Too late to add the visual aid to the OP:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
42. Hey I'm just the desiderer not the implementatorer. Talk to Hadley. He's in charge of that shit"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC