Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Liberals defend terrorists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 02:45 PM
Original message
Liberals defend terrorists
Whoopi defends Vick.

Do you see what I'm getting at here? :crazy:

Come on folks, we can do better than this! I'm sick of the "I no longer like {X (usually black) celebrity} because s/he defended Vick" threads. Explaining and understanding the "WHY" of a situation is NOT the same thing as defending it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Quite a stretch there.
Look, Whoopie justified Vick's actions, by the bullshit culture line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, she didn't. She explained it.
She didn't say it was all right. Your problem with it is she did not follow up with "and because of that he is a sadistic puke". Some things are better left implied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. No my problem with it is not
that she didn't call him a sadistic puke, but excellent job not only putting words in my mouth, but thoughts in my head. Not exactly commendable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Aren't you doing the same with her?
Because she didn't specifically say "and I hate him for it", you are assuming it was a justification when there is no evidence it was any such thing. Lack of condemnation does not equal approval.

I know another sport where people, not animals, are severely injured and sometimes killed. There is a culture that surrounds that sport which not only does not condemn it but celebrates it. To people who are not part of that culture it is incomprehensible that the risk and violence is not roundly condemned. Wouldn't a person's life be counted as more valuable than an animal's?

Am I talking about Football? Sky Diving? Scuba Diving? Skiing?

We are each comfortable with our own enculturation, and do not tend to recognize the inherant problems with it. You condemn her for not condemning him, even though she did nothing but say, "this is the way it is with a certain subculture". Again, explanation is not justification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's a ridiculous comment.
And I didn't say she defended Vick. I said she justified what he did. That's not putting words in her mouth. As for your comparison to a sport where humans get hurt, is it not flippin' obvious to you that people make a choice to fight or play football or whetever, animals do not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Listen, you have to expect this sort of thing.
We live in a country where a lot of people are functionally illiterate, and they can't, don't, or won't understand the difference between an explanation and a defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC