Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House had daily audits of e-mails, which suggests missing e-mails were destroyed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 07:33 AM
Original message
White House had daily audits of e-mails, which suggests missing e-mails were destroyed
Edited on Wed Sep-05-07 07:38 AM by kpete
White House had daily audits of e-mails, which suggests missing e-mails were destroyed
Submitted by crew on 31 August 2007 - 9:21am. Bush Administration Without A Trace

Earlier this year, CREW broke the story that five million e-mails were missing from the White House system. We issued a report, Without A Trace, detailing the legal issues behind the story of the White House e-mail scandal. Even top Bush officials could not deny our findings. Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), Chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, has been investigating the missing e-mails. Yesterday, we learned that the White House conducted daily audits of its e-mail system. As CREW's Anne Weismann told Bloomberg News, that certainly suggests the e-mails weren't lost in a technical glitch:

The revelation that there were daily audits suggests that e-mails were destroyed, said Anne Weismann, general counsel of the nonprofit watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which sued the Bush administration in May over the missing e-mails.

"It's hard to imagine it could have been a technical problem," Weismann said in an interview. It is "incomprehensible that e-mail could go missing and it not be caught."


http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/30025

..................

Last month, the White House argued in federal court that its own Office of Administration was not subject to FOIA, even though the White House website said otherwise. The White House website has now been changed.

We noted two weeks ago that the Bush administration had refused a Freedom of Information Act request for records concerning the loss of millions of White House emails. Justice Department lawyers argued that the office which maintained that information, the Office of Administration, was not subject to FOIA.

But sometimes the administration surprises even itself with its capacity for secrecy. And so it was here, since the White House website clearly stated that the Office of Administration was subject to FOIA. And the office had been busily fulfilling FOIA requests for years, even employing a FOIA officer (the Department lawyers explained in their filing that this wasn't a problem). Here's the website as it was last month:




No more. Finally, the website has caught up, as Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, the D.C. watchdog that filed the FOIA request notes. Now it's:



http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004063.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course they were purposefully destroyed nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. But there is always another computer involved in email.
Some must remain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. * could eat a baby on live TV and these dems wouldn't impeach
Its a shame. They should all be sitting in jail. There must be thousands of people with evidence who won't come forward. The "Fuck Everyone But Me' Cult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. but not a sniff from the GoP/Corp Media Establishment....odd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well they just change laws retroactively, as always...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-08-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. .
IMPEACH CHENEY FIRST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC