Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: Three new—and potentially controversial—NIEs on Iran are in the works

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 09:21 AM
Original message
Newsweek: Three new—and potentially controversial—NIEs on Iran are in the works

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20592874/site/newsweek/page/2/

<snip>

Meanwhile, NEWSWEEK has learned that intelligence agencies are close to completing three new—and potentially controversial—NIEs on Iran. The most significant of the new Iran intelligence estimates is supposed to be a comprehensive assessment of the current status of Iran’s nuclear research and production program. The two other forthcoming Iran NIE reports will evaluate Iran's conventional military capabilities and the country's general political and economic situation.

Were they to be declassified and made public, the three nearly completed Iran NIEs might help inform an increasingly intense debate in Washington. Is the Bush administration secretly making plans to take some kind of military action against Tehran's nuclear program? Two intelligence officials told NEWSWEEK that at the moment the administration appears unlikely to make public any portion of the new Iran analyses, apparently because they are based too heavily on information from sensitive intelligence sources. It would be difficult to declassify parts of the document in a way that would leave them meaningful and accurate, the officials said.

Some intrigue surrounds the pending Iran nuclear estimate. Originally, the report was supposed to have been completed and sent to policymakers in the spring. But the report was held up while "new information" was incorporated. Two officials familiar with the process said that this new information was classified, and that it was unclear how much of an impact it will have on the conclusions of the new Iran NIE. However, three intelligence officials also said that so far as they knew, the thinking about Iran's nuclear weapons program has not changed: the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment remains that Tehran is between 2.5 and 8 years away from being able to produce a nuclear bomb.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let's let the GAO make some edits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. As the intelligence community is now under WH control, any NIE will be pro war
with Iran.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. I guess we will be in for more 'you have to trust us' arguments re: attack on Iran
The Bush Administration has used this ruse numerous times with success. WE know there are WMDs there, but the proof is classified, so you must 'trust us'....

Delete 'Iraq', Replace with 'Iran', print and disseminate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Fixing the Intelligence Around the Policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC