Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush success rating at historic low.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:35 AM
Original message
Bush success rating at historic low.
President Bush’s success rating in the Democratic-controlled House has fallen this year to a half-century low, and he prevailed on only 14 percent of the 76 roll call votes on which he took a clear position.

The previous low for any president was in 1995, when Bill Clinton won just 26 percent of the time during the first year after Republicans took control of the House. If Bush’s score holds through the end of the year, he will have the lowest success rating in either chamber for any president since Congressional Quarterly began analyzing votes in 1953.

A study of House and Senate floor votes, compiled by CQ over the August recess, also showed that House Democrats have backed Bush’s legislative positions this year only 6 percent of the time, making for the strongest opposition from either party against a president in the 54 years CQ has kept score.

A separate analysis of so-called party unity votes, in which a majority of one party votes against a majority of the other, showed the possibility of another historic first for House Democrats. So far this year, Democrats have backed the majority position of their caucus 91 percent of the time on average on such votes. That marks the highest Democratic unity score in 51 years.



More: http://www.cqpolitics.com/2007/09/bush_success_rating_at_histori.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. gee this post sounds very familiar.
War, More War, Warrantless Wiretaps, What Subpoena?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Essentially, we have a frozen federal government. Congress and the other two branches
aren't keen on cooperating.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. They are on certain issues. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Only on issues where Bush can blackmail them with the troops. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's okay. * thinks that history will vindicate him.
He doesn't have to be loved right now, only feared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well if he's only getting 14% of roll call votes...
...it's hard to see how he is "feared" ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. One reason why he's feared: He's holding the troops hostage. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. You can't be a bigger failure than this asshole. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm sure he'll find novel ways to fuck things up in his remaing 500 days. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I don't doubt that. I just don't think it can make him more of a failure. -n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Oh, he's never failed to disappoint me on how disappointing he can be.
I wouldn't be surprised if he manages to blow his previous fuckedupedness out of the water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. lame chimp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. K An R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC