Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Allawi Uses Loophole to Keep Backers Secret

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 10:20 PM
Original message
Allawi Uses Loophole to Keep Backers Secret
Allawi Uses Loophole to Keep Backers Secret
By Spencer Ackerman - September 5, 2007
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004080.php


It's official: Ayad Allawi is no longer represented by Barbour Griffith & Rogers, the White House-connected lobbying firm he retained to sell the U.S. government on his "parliamentary coup" (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-allawi._slysep01,1,1802063.story)to become Iraq's next prime minister. Well, sort of.

Allawi doesn't want to disclose who's paying BGR's $300,000 fee. But since Allawi admitted on CNN that he's not paying the bill himself, BGR has to either disclose to the Justice Department which "agent of a foreign principal" it receives money from or violate the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Innocent question: why does this actually exempt them from disclosure?
BG&R had Maliki as a client. It no longer has Maliki as a client. Why would BG&R be exempted from disclosing who paid the $300,000 fee of a former client? What am I missing here? $300,000 is not chump change and surely falls under some kind of reporting requirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "political parties aren't required to disclose their sources of funding under FARA"
I guess the law allows for a change of mind!

Ridiculous, it seems, not to mention a cover up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well obviously if the DoJ doesn't wanna push it, the law is irrelevant
but I do find that 'change of mind' rather... curious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC