Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Growing uninsured population reflects failure of political leaders

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 11:24 PM
Original message
Growing uninsured population reflects failure of political leaders
Kucinich: growing uninsured population reflects failure of political leaders

http://www.dennis4president.com/go/newsroom/kucinich%3a-growing-uninsured-population-reflects-failure-of-political-leaders/


WASHINGTON, D.C. -- "The shocking increase in the number of uninsured Americans is an indictment of the scandalous inattention and failure of political leaders to honestly address this nation’s Number One domestic priority: health care, Ohio Congressman and Democratic Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich said today.

“The fault lies at the doorstep of the White House, the floor of the U.S. Congress, and with the leadership of both political parties,” Kucinich said.
“In fact,” he added, “the Democratic Party itself must bear a large part of the responsibility for this national crisis, and the Democratic candidates for President have a moral obligation to be honest and direct with the voters about how they plan to deal with this issue – something they have failed to do so far.” He singled out front-running Democratic candidates, U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton, U.S. Senator Barack Obama, and former U.S. Senator John Edwards for “their failure to exhibit the kind of leadership on this issue that the American people deserve from someone seeking the Presidency.”

Kucinich was reacting to yesterday’s report by the by the U.S. Census Bureau showing that the number uninsured Americans has skyrocketed from 44.8 million in 2005 to 47.0 million last year. Equally worrisome, the Census Bureau reported that the number of full-time workers without health insurance rose from 20.8 million 22.0 million in 2006, and the number of uninsured children jumped more than 600,000 to reach 8.6 million after five years of steady decline.

“This is a crisis, and it requires a dramatic and fundamental change in the way this nation finances health care and provides health care coverage,” Kucinich said. “and it is a scandal that most of my Democratic colleagues seeking the nomination for the Presidency are putting forth half-measures, flawed strategies, and highly suspect schemes in the name of reform.

“I have challenged them on this,” Kucinich added, and I intend to continue challenging them until they demonstrate the courage and the integrity to tackle the for-profit health care industry in this country and embrace the only reform that will reverse this tragic trend: a national, not-for-profit, single payer health insurance plan that will cover all Americans, not just those who can afford health care coverage.”


Kucinich took special aim at the three Democratic candidates currently leading in national polls -- Clinton, Obama, and Edwards. “As the candidates currently drawing the most media attention, they have the greatest opportunity to use that bully pulpit to advocate sweeping reforms. Instead, for a variety of reasons that beg much closer scrutiny, their plans protect and preserve the roles of private, for-profit companies; and, in some cases, open the door for even greater profits at the expense of taxpayers and everyday Americans.”

Kucinich is the only candidate who has actually co-authored and co-sponsored legislation (H.R. 676) to establish a national, not-for-profit health insurance plan that would cover the medical needs of all Americans without premiums, deductibles, or co-payments.

In 2000, Kucinich took the plan to the Gore-Leiberman Democratic Platform Committee for inclusion in the party’s platform, “and they told me that the insurance and pharmaceutical interests were too powerful to challenge.” In 2004, he took the plan to the Kerry-Edwards Democratic Platform Committee, “and I got the same answer,” Kucinich said.

“Now, we have the leading Democratic candidates for President engaged in a fraudulent debate about which of their health care plans is the most ‘universal’ when, in fact, those plans keep the for-profits in control and poised to profit even more if they begin receiving federal subsidies and incentives to reduce premiums to make insurance more affordable to more people.”

Questions should be raised, Kucinich said, about whether the candidates lack the courage and conviction to tackle the for-profit health care industry or their relationships with those interests “are too cozy and too lucrative.”


To make his point, Kucinich cited figures from today’s Boston Globe newspaper detailing campaign contributions to the leading Democratic candidates.

According to award-winning columnist Derrick Z. Jackson: “The hold of the healthcare industry on the top candidates is already apparent.” According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the top recipient of campaign contributions so far from the pharmaceutical and health products industry is Republican Mitt Romney ($228,260). But the next two are Democrats Barack Obama ($161,124) and Hillary Clinton ($146,000). The top recipient of contributions from health professionals is Clinton ($990,611). Romney is second at $806,837, and Obama third at $748,637.

The Globe column also noted that the top recipient of cash from the insurance industry, which includes health insurers, is another Democrat, Connecticut's Christopher Dodd, at $605,950. Romney and Republican Rudolph Giuliani are second and third, with Clinton and Obama fourth and fifth. Even though Obama is in fifth place, he still has collected $269,750 from individuals with ties to insurance companies.



Also according to the Center for Responsive Politics, Edwards received almost $188,000 from individuals associated with Fortress Investment Group, a hedge fund manager with huge investments in for-profit health care companies, notably the giant Humana, Inc. which specializes in Medicare programs. Edwards was a consultant to Fortress in 2005 and 2006 and earned a reported $480,000 in compensation.


Public filings show Humana’s profits from its Medicare business soared 194.7%, to $288.8 million, from $98.0 million for the year-ago period. Second-quarter Medicare Advantage premiums of $2.8 billion were up 33 percent from $2.1 billion. And, premiums from Humana's stand-alone Medicare prescription drug plans totaled just over $1 billion for the quarter, a 31 percent increase from a year earlier. Membership in the company's stand-alone Medicare prescription drug plans totaled 3.44 million as of June 30.

“Any candidate who proposes securing a role for private, for-profit companies in the U.S. health care system is, in effect, ensuring billions of dollars in profits for those companies, money that should be going to providing health coverage for Americans,” Kucinich said.

“With the ranks of the uninsured and under-insured Americans growing by millions each year, it’s time for my esteemed colleagues to get serious, stop dancing around the issue, and do the right thing for the American people. The right thing is a national, not-for-profit health insurance system that will cover every American. Anything other than that, anything less than is a sham,” Kucinich concluded."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
datadiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great article, thanks for the link
He doesn't have a chance in winning with the media so focused on the top three candidates. I found the support they have from the pharms and insurance companies very disturbing. I am going to email all three and ask them why they are taking money from them when those industries are so busy ripping off the American people. Dennis is so right on with HR 676, I don't know why more people aren't hollering at the top of their lungs demanding it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. YW, Dennis has been saying that efforts to adopt a not for
profit system are essentially being blocked. There are just too many people who profit one way or another from the current system, so many only offer half measures in an attempt to keep both sides in balance.

IMO we do not have time for half measures with all the health care costs our nation will have in the not too distant future, returning vets and more people eligible for Medicare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's the clearest and most convincing issue indicating the corporate control of our politicians.
We ARE a "Corporate State" and it will only get worse as Americans gorge ourselves on fast-food and fascist-news - both toxic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes and it does not hold promise for any improvement in the
foreseeable future, as long as someone with a D wins all be fine.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. shameless kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dennis is the only candidate telling it like it is
K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. How many times does he have mention the struggle
within our own party for people to wake up.

Thanks for the K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The frontrunners are all bought and paid for
and, ipso facto, we only hear what they have been told they can say. Ugh. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Ugh is right... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Summer93 Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. We can win
I wonder if people are secretly planning to vote a new way in the upcoming election. They are keeping it secret because they will vote for Kucinich and his health plan. In my dreams it turns out OK. So many people are aware of what the big candidates offer and are not willing to settle for less and choose him as their number one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-08-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. If DU is representative there are many willing to settle for less,
but I hope your dream vomes true :)

Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-08-07 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. the sticking point for most politicians is the role that HMOs and insurance companies . . .
should play in any new or overhauled healthcare plan . . .

the bottom line is that HMOs contribute nothing to providing Americans with quality healthcare . . . their sole reason for existing is to siphon off billions and billions of healthcare dollars for their own corporate profits -- dollars that could otherwise be spent actually providing healthcare . . .

but most politicians are unwilling to write HMOs out of healthcare planning . . . either they believe that HMOs are somehow essential to the provision of healthcare services or, more likely, they are recipients of campaign funds from the very corporations that are siphoning off all those billions . . . recall that the healthcare plan that Hillary proposed during Bill's first term was centered on HMOs -- as will any new plan she may propose as president . . .

until we take obscene corporate profits out of healthcare, all of those billions will continue to go to corporate shareholders and executives, making the services we receive (and the drugs we need) even more expensive than they are now . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-08-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Thanks and I agree...
when I think of all the expenses our nation will have in the near future those profits will be vital for our nation. IMO we are running out of time and half measures will not be enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC