mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:11 PM
Original message |
Businesses Are Not Something You Have a Personal Relationship With |
|
Setting aside the whole legality of the receipts/search/being detained business -
I'm always shocked by complaints that a store wanting to see a receipt or have you check your bag is an insult.
The store isn't your friend or your family. Trust is what you have in your personal relationships.
You might have some faith or trust or respect as a bonus. But your interaction with your employer, your grocery, your Costco the Airport, or any other business is financial and to varying degrees formalized.
If you think your relationship with the electronics tore is based on TRUST, just refuse the receipt for your next big ticket item, or just throw it away - after all, you trust each other, right? So you won't need your receipt.
Costco isn't insulting its members by screening everything that leaves the store. They're not saying you're a common criminal.
But you might be. :-)
|
La Lioness Priyanka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message |
1. on the flip side, because they are not my friend, i might not want to concede any of my rights |
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I agree completely. You shouldn't concede your rights. |
|
And I don't want to either.
But it is worth getting clear on what are actually rights. :-)
|
La Lioness Priyanka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. true. i am not defending the circuit city guy, i didnt really read that story |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-07-07 01:22 PM by lionesspriyanka
i am just saying that if i object to being searched a business cannot expect me to cooperate. they are not my friends.
|
ewoden
(634 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Thanks Mondo for telling us how we should feel... |
|
What next, how we should think? :-)
By the way that soulless relationship sounds a lot like Moore's diatribe about GM in Michigan. The old unfettered capitalism bit. As the monologue goes if there is no morality in commerce then the sale of crack cocaine is one of the purest forms of market influence and nobody should be outraged if GM sold crack, right?.
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. I'm not telling you how to feel. I'm reminding you of reality. |
|
:-)
Since I support decriminalization of drugs, if they are legal I'm not particularly worried about who sells them.
|
Clintonista2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Circuit City can treat you like shit, and there's a solution- |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-07-07 01:20 PM by Lirwin2
Don't shop there. If they were specifically targetting a certain group (i.e; only checking receipts of Black people), then we would have a problem.
|
ewoden
(634 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. And so if all stores adopt this, we shop where? |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-07-07 01:25 PM by ewoden
just asking.
I personally let them know I don't like the practice. They usually leave me alone after a couple of times. And the moral to that is that YES they actually do select certain groups, and the group they search is the sheeple.
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. If all stores adopt WHAT exactly? |
ewoden
(634 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. Policies stating that I |
|
must submit to search of my parcels to shop there.
I'm not saying thatit is right or wrong, legal or not. I'm saying that one is still free in this country to argue with that, if one so chooses.
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. That's a legal question. |
|
You're still free tyo argue with anything you like. Creationists are proof of that.
|
ewoden
(634 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. So not liking to be searhed is the same as |
|
believing in a myth in your opinion? Oh how far this society is falling.
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. Try reading it again. My point is you can argue against anything you like. |
|
There are no prohibitions on arguing, on disliking or on being very vocal about it.
|
ewoden
(634 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. I read it right the first time, as you intended |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-07-07 01:42 PM by ewoden
arguing anything is like being a creationist. Hey that's ok though.
|
ret5hd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Theoretically, how long may a business entity legally detain you... |
|
without evidence of a crime on your part?
30 seconds?
1 hour?
1 day?
|
ewoden
(634 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
14. A "reasonable amount of time" in most states where such |
|
laws exist.
In the words of the sheeple, "it's not that baaaaaaad." :-)
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
10. So, you set aside the core issue and make this about trust? |
|
:wtf:
This has nothing to do with trust but with due process.
Got me to post. Congrats!
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. This isn't about that - it's a SEPARATE issue. |
|
I don't think the main issue is about trust. It's a set of legal questions.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
27. Then, I guess I just don't understand your OP. n/t |
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
30. For what it's worth, the Circuit City story resulted in a number of posts |
|
with sentiments I've seen befoer -- that having to check your bags at some stores is perceived as an insult, or that checking your receipt (even at membership places like Costco) is an insult, or makes people feel they are accused of being theives.
My OP is not about the legality of the particular Circuit City incident, which is still being debated and will likely be resolved in court.
I'm just talking about the phenomenon of people thinking their relatinship with a store is based on trust.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
32. Thanks for the clarification. n/t |
Nicholas D Wolfwood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. Last I checked, due process applies to the government. |
|
Not to what a private entity does on its own private property.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
25. Nope. It's what citizens can expect or, what we used to expect. n/t |
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
17. It's a two way contract |
|
Costco you might be more willing to bend for - there are reasons for it - since you are a member, the relationship is closer, so to speak. And there it could be part of the contract.
Typical retail - they should be trying to get you in there to buy their crap - IOW, ordering you around is the last thing they want to appear to do. That's why they get those chips and detectors - CC is saving money on that.
If they expect customers to help them let them be real nice about it rather than authoritarian.
The issue to this story is: the security guard and the cop were under the impression they could force it and use the power of the state to back it up.
|
ewoden
(634 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Businesses Are Not Something You Have a Personal Relationship With |
|
All businesses? The doctor's office? The Law office? Your financial advisor? Really?
So when Allstate denies one's clain to restore your house after a hurricane, one shouldn't take it personally?
So when the airline pilot arrives to fly your pane drunk, hey it's only business, don't take it personally?
Darn I had no idea serving you clients or customers was so devoid of trust, respect, morals.
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. Really. Your relationships with your doctor, lawyer etc are also |
|
formal relationships with laws and regulations.
When a pilot tries to fly drunk it's not personal - it's a legal violation.
When Allstate denies a claim that's not personal either - it's either in your contract and he's fucking you over or it's not and you're SOL.
I'm glad you're learning.
|
ewoden
(634 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
26. No expectation of any morals. You are so easily pleased n/t |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-07-07 01:49 PM by ewoden
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
28. Morals are personal. This is a formal, legal relationship. |
|
You can go through life expecting others to satisfy your moral sense, if that's how you like to spend your time.
IMO you are better served by being a smart advocate for your rights and responsibilities.
|
snappyturtle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
22. What ever happened to the attitude that the customer is always right? |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-07-07 01:45 PM by snappyturtle
I remember shopping at local department stores in the fifties and sixties when the people at the door, held the door, so customers could exit easily. Now we're checked like thieves 50 feet from the cash register. I don't shop at the stores doing this anymore. When I did I showed them my displeasure by my actions. I would take my time retrieving my receipt from my zipped wallet in my purse. I would present the receipt so the inspector could take a 10 second look see and then reverse the receipt retrieval. By the time I got that done there would be a line behind me....oh well. I never said one word. Thank goodness I don't deal with these people anymore.....until I suppose the local grocery or Walgreens decide to check purchases. Why don't they put a camera over the cash register if this procedure is so important to their bottom line. Do they inspect their employees when they leave after a shift?
I also want to know from those who think this policy is so swell, what happens if the inspector finds an item in my possession I haven't paid for although I obviously went through the checkout? Is it the checker's fault or mine? When I shopped at Sam's Club once every six weeks my bill would be between four and five hundred dollars....I was too busy packing a cart and boxes with my purchases to watch the checker scan evey item. This "mistake" I've proposed could happen....so then what?
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
24. IMO you did exactly the right thing. If you don't like how a store treats you, |
|
don't spend your money there.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
29. If we observed that logic in all aspects of daily life |
|
we'd be housebound.
It's the "love it or leave it" argument on wheels.
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
31. Nonsense. Stores are competing for your $. If you support the ones |
|
you like, and not the ones you don't, it leads to more of what you want.
Or you could just keep spending your money there and complain about it.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
36. What's funny about this is, I rarely go to stores at all. |
|
I order up everything on line or over the phone.
But, I reserve the right to complain. :)
|
snappyturtle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
33. YES! I agree with you. I do not like this policy of stores and the above poster |
|
never answered my question. They lure us into their stores and treat us like shit when we leave. I had a gift shop....probably had some theft....but for the most part people who check out are very honest. I think the "problem" lies with their employees or there really isn't a big problem at all it's just intimidation.....like "don't you even think about stealing from us"....poor business practices. If they make it an ordeal for me I hand it back in kind.
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
34. "Hand it back in kind"? Hand it back to whom, exactly? |
snappyturtle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
37. If they're bent on interrupting my departure I make certain that |
|
it takes long enough to gum up the works a bit. I figure if the "inspector" is annoyed management will find out and save me the time from telling them myself. If they make me march to their drummer I just change the tempo a bit. I say nothing...do just what they want....maybe just not how they want. What can they say?
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
35. How come I can never find a Home Depot employee when |
|
I need help finding a thingy? They're ALL at the doors! lol
:hi:
|
porphyrian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |
23. If it's your personal business, you do. - n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message |