Richardson Best Explains the Facts on The Middle East Situation

[Dr Ron]

Cross posted from Liberal Values--see original post for multiple links:

http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2116

Richardson Best Explains the Facts on The Middle East Situation

While the media (and most bloggers) concentrate on three candidates with the least experience, Bill Richardson demonstrates again why he is qualified to be president. Writing in The Washington Post, Richardson argues Why We Should Exit Iraq Now. Richardson understands what most of the other candidates do not, that it is our very presence in Iraq which inflames the situation and strengthens the hands of the terrorists who are taking advantage of the situation.

While many of the Democrats do not go far enough, it remains the Republicans (other than Ron Paul) who are totally clueless. A meme going through some Republican sites today is that Osama bin Laden wants us to leave Iraq, and therefore we should remain so that we don’t do as he desires. Beyond the point that we should not allow bin Laden to influence our decisions either way, we must also question why he calls for the United States to leave. Having the United States in Iraq attracts many to bin Laden’s cause. Bin Laden benefits as long as he can call on the United States to leave, but once we do leave we remove this recruitment tool from al Qaeda.

Richardson argues similarly when he discusses the situation:

Those who think we need to keep troops in Iraq misunderstand the Middle East. I have met and negotiated successfully with many regional leaders, including Saddam Hussein. I am convinced that only a complete withdrawal can sufficiently shift the politics of Iraq and its neighbors to break the deadlock that has been killing so many people for so long.

Our troops have done everything they were asked to do with courage and professionalism, but they cannot win someone else’s civil war. So long as American troops are in Iraq, reconciliation among Iraqi factions is postponed. Leaving forces there enables the Iraqis to delay taking the necessary steps to end the violence. And it prevents us from using diplomacy to bring in other nations to help stabilize and rebuild the country.

The presence of American forces in Iraq weakens us in the war against al-Qaeda. It endows the anti-American propaganda of those who portray us as occupiers plundering Iraq’s oil and repressing Muslims. The day we leave, this myth collapses, and the Iraqis will drive foreign jihadists out of their country. Our departure would also enable us to focus on defeating the terrorists who attacked us on Sept. 11, those headquartered along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border — not in Iraq.

Another example of Richardson’s view of foreign policy was recently discussed, with an excerpt from his article on A New Realism in The Harvard International Review.

It is a shame that our political process is largely based upon sound bites and one minute responses to questions in a pseudo-debate. When Richardson is out campaigning, or writing on his views in greater detail, he appears much more presidential than during the debates. The news media prefers to make a news story out of a comment which was clearly a joke while paying little attention to matters of substance such as Richardson’s writings on foreign policy.

Al Gore has recently discussed the way in which his campaign was harmed by poor media coverage. One function which the blogs might perform is to counter this type of coverage from the media by discussing matters of substance such as the views Richardson has expressed. Instead we saw some liberal blogs repeat and distort poorly reported news from the media without concern for the facts.

Richardson has been receiving increasing support from voters who listen to him speak in Iowa and New Hampshire. There have also been writers, both in the media and blogosphere, who have recognized this. James Boyce recently picked Richardson as the number two candidate. Some predict that Richardson will even win the Iowa caucus. The Concord Monitor has noted that Richardson is on the way up. Even Fox News has moved Richardson up to number three in the horse race.

Hopefully Richardson’s statement on Iraq will force the other Democratic candidates to either adopt a similar position or to fully explain how many troops they plan to leave in Iraq and what they expect them to accomplish. I’m also hoping that this forces Obama, the one “top tier” candidate who has the intelligence and ideas, if not the experience, to respond to our current problems to present his views in more detail.

[Olney Blue]

1. I'm VERY impressed with Richardson's op ed piece today.

I'm listening, Governor, and I like what I hear.

[sandnsea]

2. Are we leaving the Embassy too?

Richardson never mentions the Embassy, is he not planning on maintaining diplomatic relations as we do with other ME countries?

[ludwigb]

3. Good Post

Richardson's op-ed was excellent. Concise and clear.

I'm eager to see how the right-wing spinsters react. Will they just ignore it? Or will they try to pick apart select sentences and distort them? I'm thinking the former cause the last thing they want to do is link to this op-ed.

Richardson has my vote. He's leading on the most important issue, and the "top tier" candidates need to come around to his position fast.