Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thompson's First Wife Filed For Divorce Over "Cruel And Inhumane Treatment"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 03:47 PM
Original message
Thompson's First Wife Filed For Divorce Over "Cruel And Inhumane Treatment"



Moreover, when Thompson married his first wife, Sarah Lindsey, at Lawrenceburg Methodist Church in 1959, she was already two months pregnant with their first child.

The marriage wasn't to last. Though Thompson tries to portray their 1985 break-up as amicable and his family says Sarah will campaign for him, we can disclose that in her original divorce writ - which until now has never been made public - she accused him of "cruel and inhuman treatment".

Her brother, Oscar Lindsey, confirmed the marriage was one of secrets and unhappiness. Like Hillary Clinton, who suffered through her husband Bill's "bimbo eruptions",it seems Sarah is standing by Fred because she shares his political goals. ...

She withdrew the petition the following March, and according to her brother, the marriage improved for a while.

But Sarah renewed the proceedings in November 1984, this time citing "irreconcilable differences".

Asked if Thompson was unfaithful, her brother replied carefully: "He has said he 'takes opportunities' . I will tell you it wasn't physical cruelty and it wasn't mental."

More:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=480740&in_page_id=1811&in_a_source=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. "He's the kind of man every little girl dreams of marrying" according to Lorrie Morgan
"He's the kind of man little girls dream about marrying. He opens doors for you, lights your cigarettes, helps you on with your coat, buys wonderful gifts. It's every woman's fantasy," Lorrie said.

Yeah. Every little girl dreams of marrying a man who who "takes opportunities" - just as long as he opens the door for her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Lorrie Morgan is a delusional moron!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. Lorrie Morgan has been married about a half a dozen times
and at least one of her husbands drank himself to death, so I don't think I'll take any advice on men from her...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. a man who drinks himself to death .... well, that just makes me swoon!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Lorrie Morgan must be perpetuating the "sugar daddy" complex
Sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. yeah, I guess the "daddy" complex manifests itself differently for men and women!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Right. The kind that will throw you in jail for getting an abortion.
Swoon! Swoon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. Yeah, RIGHT! He's the kind of man every little girl
dreams about marrying...and then wakes up screaming: "Mommy! I had another nightmare!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fred Thompson: Wife Beater! He is the perfect candidate for...
the GOP. He's a southerner, a huckster, a neo-con tool, and a wife beater! He's the perfect Rethug!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Strange that this hasn't surfaced before. Timing is everything.
Don't get me wrong. I don't support this Asshole for Pres. I don't think he will
garner the nomination. Rudy & Fred will cancel each other out. Mitt will be the nominee with
Jeb as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Mormons are the bagmen for the mob???
Could you elaborate on that? I'm not saying you're wrong--it's just something I've never heard of before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RavensChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I'm not surprised
Just the thing we need to watch. It's doubtful he'll make it past the primaries. Anyone who supports him is delusional at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
losthills Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's a non-story.
The majority of Americans have been through the same stuff, many of them more than once.

She's campaigning for him....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It's certainly not going to help him and will likely take him down a few percentage points
especially with women. In a close election this kind of story may be just enough to tip the balance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Maybe, but the title of the article starts out "The Tennessee stud"
some women might like that. Especially Republican women like Lorrie Morgan (see my post above).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Be careful how much you make of reasons for divorce back then.
The reasons wre very restrictive, and only few were recognized by the courts as valid.

I'm not supporting Freddie at all, I just don't want you to get caught up in a web you don't understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. in 1985?
when are you referring to when you say "back then"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. This University of Memphis Law Review article states that Tennessee
adopted a no fault divorce law in 1977.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3843/is_199901/ai_n8829904/pg_9

The first Thompson divorce petition was filed in 1981.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Agreed. Things still get said in divorces that have little relevance to truth
And agreed about not supporting fred of hollywood. I though gouliani was the scariest man I'd ever seen, until freds mug came up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. The duplicity of Thompson will be exposed with opposition research....
He is jumping in pretending to be one thing, when he is something else entirely.

Thompson is going to be a big flash in the pan, and then he will be gone.

He has done nothing significant with his career in Congress, and his personal life does not come close to matching the character requirements of the Right Wing Fundamentalist Conservatives of the Repub Party.

They can call him 'southern fried Reagan' all they want. Wait till the public learns his true nature and actions fail to match those of St. Ronnie.

And while this is a bold prediction, I believe the Dems will never get a chance to take a clean shot at Thompson. IMHO Giuliani and Romney will take care of him shortly with their own opposition research. Once Thompson took the plunge into the race, that meant the gloves would come off.

Just from the public's point of view, he is not a great public speaker, he is not very smart, he has not been ambitious about anything other than acquiring money, and he has little grasp of what it takes to be President.

It is only a matter of time before 'crash and burn.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RavensChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. And when they crash and burn
I'll be cheering the Dems on, popcorn in hand. I predict it'll happen when the primaries commence.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Cheating dog! now he's a moralizing Repuglicon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. He will flop.
Mitt Romney linked to Bush family; Jeb Bush encouraged to run for president
From our "will we never learn/will the nightmare never end" department comes this:
Jeb Bush, who hasn't publicly picked a favorite in the Republican presidential race, privately is talking up the candidacy of Mitt Romney and steering some of his closest advisers to the campaign.

The former Florida governor has said repeatedly he won't be a candidate in 2008 despite encouragement from his father, the former president, and his brother, the current one. But Jeb Bush's support, even tacit, would be critical in the state that decided the 2000 presidential election.

is one of several former Bush confidantes in the Romney camp. Others include his hand-picked, former state party chairman Al Cardenas, and Sally Bradshaw, 's former campaign manager and chief of staff...

http://www.lonewacko.com/blog/archives/006329.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. hope he flops big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. That is the standard legal complaint in uncontested divorce.
It's used all the time in uncontested divorce because it doesn't require proof. The plaintiff complains that the defendant refused to have sex with him, the defendant agrees, and voila, you're divorced. Other complaints, such as adultery, could require third party testimony or some other proof. So if you are both in agreement and want a simple and easy divorce, 'cruel and inhumane treatment' is the box to check off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Not anymore. No fault divorce only requires "irreconcilable differences"
to be cited. Tennessee has had no fault divorce since 1977-- four years before Mrs. Thompson first filed for divorce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. so why would she cite it? to get a better settlement? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. To put his next beloved on notice that he is a cruel, inhumane p*ick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. maybe because it is an accurate description?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
26. He took the bag off of his face
when they were having sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
31. The guy is very creepy. Totally...
...and he was the Nixon mole on the Senate Judiciary Committee - Sen. Sam Ervin's committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
33. His 'womanizing' is well-known on the Hill, not endearing to the fundies...
I heard Tony Perkins had 'cooled' some on Fred as the being the standard bearer for the conservative rightwing fundamentalists.

I wonder if he got heartburn over the well earned moniker 'the Tennessee Stud'???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC