|
Now I'm mad. :rant:
Forget about infringing my constitutional rights, shifting the balance of power in the government, increasing the spying powers of the federal government - now they're messing with my daughter's right to breathe (and made me a criminal, in the process).
I was so fed up with having to get the allergy medication my daughter needs from behind the pharmacy counter (having the pharmacist read me each price and quantity, and punching numbers into my calculator to figure out the best buy, finding the pharmacy closed when my daughter runs out of medication at 9 at night, showing ID and signing the controlled substances log) that I decided to buy enough to last through ragweed season so I wouldn't have to go through this again this year. I called every pharmacy around. They thought I was nuts - and most only carried Claritin-D in 10 pill quantities (the most expensive brand, in the most expensive quantity). I finally found one that carried Alavert-D in a quantity of 24. Per state law, I am permitted to purchase 9 grams of pseudoephedrine a month, not quite enough to last until the hard frost sometime in November (for those of you who haven't encountered ragweed allergies - the hard freeze means the end of suffering), so my spouse purchased her monthly quantity as well which will almost get us there.
When I commented to the pharmacist that they might want to check with their attorney about the log they asked me to sign, since the state law recited in the log only restricts the sale of products which have a single active ingredient of pseudoephedrine (not the combination of loratadine and pseudoephedrine I was purchasing), he explained that the Federal law pre-empted the state law and required logging all sales of anything containing pseudoephedrine even if it was not the only active ingredient.
I dutifully signed the state log book for my purchase of 2-24 packs of Alavert-D, which carried the recitation of state law that I could only purchase 9 grams a month of a product in which pseudoephedrine was the only active ingredient. All ok, so far (except for my aggravation at the restriction in the first place).
Went home and discovered that the superseding federal law (thanks to the Patriot Act) imposed an additional restriction of 3.6 grams a day. Oops. If you've got a package of Claritin-D or Alavert-D (the 12 hour variety) you might want to do the math for two 24 pill packages - don't need to incriminate myself any more than the log book already does.
Unless I'm misreading it, the Patriot Act made it against the law to purchase more than a 15 day supply of allergy medication at a time. Guess I'm glad that they are still using the state log books, which only mention the monthly restriction, not the daily one . . . or I guess I'm glad until they show up knocking on my door.
Aside from granting the pharmacies having a monopoly which provides a disincentive to carry anything but the most expensive brand at the most expensive quantity, and limiting purchases to less than month of medication, the added state restrictions (since portions stricter than federal law are not pre-empted) prohibit sales to minors. That makes it impossible for families in which both a parent and a minor child have allergies to legally obtain the medication needed to treat allergies for a month. (A month of medication is about 7.2 grams - if the minor can't buy it, and both the minor and the parent need it, the parent can only buy 9 grams for the month - not the 14.4 grams they need to control allergies.)
:rant:
Seriously, this is nowhere near the most serious implication of the Patriot Act - but it is darn annoying. If anyone has found any great solutions, I'd love to hear them before mid-October when I may have to test to see if they have wizened up to the daily restrictions...
|