Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Petreaus to soldiers: surge "has not worked out as we had hoped"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 07:30 PM
Original message
Petreaus to soldiers: surge "has not worked out as we had hoped"
http://commonsense.ourfuture.org/petreaus_soldiers_surge_has_not_worked_out_we_had_hoped

Petreaus to soldiers: surge "has not worked out as we had hoped"

By Rick Perlstein on September 9, 2007 - 12:38am.

General Petraeus will be testifying to Congress Monday. Tell your Congressman to ask him about this:

General David Petraeus, the commander of United States forces in Iraq, admitted on Friday that sending 30 000 more troops into the war zone in January had failed to yield the desired results. "It has not worked out as we had hoped," the general said.

The acknowledgement by Petraeus that the situation in Iraq is "exceedingly complex" and that progress had been "uneven" came on the eve of his testimony to Congress on the state of the war. He offered the assessment in a letter to US forces serving in Iraq that was obtained by the Washington Post....

"Many of us had hoped this summer would be a time of tangible political progress at the national level," Petraeus wrote. "All participants, Iraqi and coalition alike, are dissatisfied by the halting progress on major legislative initiatives," he wrote.


Though he seems to be saying something different to the press:

On the question of a troop withdrawal, the general has indicated in a number of interviews this week that he might not replace troops when they come to the end of their deployment next April.

"Based on the progress our forces are achieving, I expect to be able to recommend that some of our forces will be redeployed without replacement," he told the Boston Globe by email on Friday.... "Few of these political solutions would have been possible without the improved security provided by coalition and Iraqi forces."


The poor man can't keep his stories straight. If our lawmakers don't endeavor to pin him down next week, their dereliction of duty will have been profound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. When will Mr. Kagan be sigining up?l
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. HOPED? How are we running the military? By PRAYER? WHAT'S THE FUCKING *P*L*A*N*? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC