AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-10-07 02:16 PM
Original message |
"Pre-surge level by summer of 2008" doesn't that still leave like 130,000 troops in Iraq? |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-10-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I've a chart in my journal of the troops levels since 2003 |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-10-07 02:19 PM by Solly Mack
and "pre-surge" levels have gone as high as 162K...
I'll dig for it later...but it is there.
And your point is an excellent point!!
|
Klukie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-10-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message |
2. That is what I was thinking also... |
|
They are only giving up the extra troops they sent for the surge but they make it seem like a troop reduction.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-10-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. exactly, just in time for the republicans running for office "See were bringing them home!" |
robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-10-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message |
3. plus an equal number of mercenaries... |
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-10-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. yup, looks like mercenaries will be spending the next 25 years in Iraq. |
Cameron27
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-10-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
it's just another spin. If the Dems can't get the votes to defund this, we'll be there until after Bush leaves.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-10-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It's a kind of a pretend withdrawal all dishonest politicians can get around.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:15 AM
Response to Original message |