McClatchy: What Crocker & Petraeus Didn't Say

[Hissyspit]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20070911/wl_mcclatchy/20070910bcusiraqpetraeusanalysis_attn_national_foreign_editors_yto

What Crocker and Petraeus didn't say
By Nancy A. Youssef and Leila Fadel, McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration's top two officials in Iraq answered questions from Congress for more than six hours on Monday, but their testimony may have been as important for what they didn't say as for what they did. A chart displayed by Army Gen. David Petraeus that purported to show the decline in sectarian violence in Baghdad between December and August made no effort to show that the ethnic character of many of the neighborhoods had changed in that same period from majority Sunni Muslim or mixed to majority Shiite Muslim.

Neither Petraeus nor U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker talked about the fact that since the troop surge began the pace by which Iraqis were abandoning their homes in search of safety had increased. They didn't mention that 86 percent of Iraqis who've fled their homes said they'd been targeted because of their sect, according to the International Organization for Migration .

While Petraeus stressed that civilian casualties were down over the last five weeks, he drew no connection between that statement and a chart he displayed that showed that the number of attacks rose during at least one of those weeks.

Petraeus also didn't highlight the fact that his charts showed that "ethno-sectarian" deaths in August, down from July, were still higher than in June, and he didn't explain why the greatest drop in such deaths, which peaked in December, occurred between January and February, before the surge began.

MORE

[bleever]

1. Spreadsheet-wielding conspiracy theorists.

I'm not buying it.


K&R.

[Hissyspit]

2. .

[Breeze54]

3. Not to mention the escalation ("surge") is being extended to over a year!

Until 2010 or longer!!! :grr:

The surge was not supposed to be for this long at all!!!