Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Tale of Two Speeches: In Washington, American Ambassador’s Tone Is Upbeat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:06 AM
Original message
A Tale of Two Speeches: In Washington, American Ambassador’s Tone Is Upbeat
A Tale of Two Speeches: In Washington, American Ambassador’s Tone Is Upbeat
By ALISSA J. RUBIN and DAMIEN CAVE

BAGHDAD, Sept. 10 — The assessment that Ryan C. Crocker, the American ambassador to Iraq, gave to Congress on Monday left unmentioned or glossed over some of the most troubling developments of the past nine months. His portrait of Iraq did not include many of the signs of deepening divisions between Sunni Arabs and Shiites and within each sect, which have raised fears among many Iraqis that their country will fracture further.

His testimony did not address the continuing wave of internal displacements, only glancingly mentioned Baghdad’s starved infrastructure and said almost nothing about the government’s inability or unwillingness to deliver services to other parts of the country as well.

His description of the growth of provincial power neglected to mention its darker side: Some provinces are becoming rival power centers and could as easily contribute to the country’s disintegration as to its stability.


Clearly the challenge before Mr. Crocker was immense. Unlike his military counterpart, Gen. David H. Petraeus, who narrowed his purview to quantifiable security measures, the ambassador had the task of making a coherent case for extending a substantial American presence though political advances had amounted to little more than initial talks among groups with a history of armed clashes and broken promises.

As he has since he arrived, Mr. Crocker tried to change the terms of the debate, suggesting that Congress should focus on the informal ways that Iraq was improving, rather than specific benchmarks or deadlines. He also sought, as he had before, to force lawmakers to consider the dangers that would likely unfold if they acceded to the popular demands for a speedy withdrawal, and he sought to put Iraq’s struggles in historical context.

more...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/11/world/middleeast/11squad.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC