Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

September 2004 Petraeus Report ........

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:19 PM
Original message
September 2004 Petraeus Report ........
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 12:54 PM by doublethink
The following was original published in the Op-ED section of The Washington Post on September 26 2004 (bold text added for emphasis)


Battling for Iraq


By David H. Petraeus Sunday, September 26, 2004

BAGHDAD -- Helping organize, train and equip nearly a quarter-million of Iraq's security forces is a daunting task. Doing so in the middle of a tough insurgency increases the challenge enormously, making the mission akin to repairing an aircraft while in flight -- and while being shot at. Now, however, 18 months after entering Iraq, I see tangible progress. Iraqi security elements are being rebuilt from the ground up.
The institutions that oversee them are being reestablished from the top down. And Iraqi leaders are stepping forward, leading their country and their security forces courageously
in the face of an enemy that has shown a willingness to do anything to disrupt the establishment of the new Iraq.

In recent months, I have observed thousands of Iraqis in training and then watched as they have conducted numerous operations. Although there have been reverses -- not to mention horrific terrorist attacks -- there has been progress in the effort to enable Iraqis to shoulder more of the load for their own security, something they are keen to do. The future undoubtedly will be full of difficulties, especially in places such as Fallujah. We must expect setbacks and recognize that not every soldier or policeman we help train will be equal to the challenges ahead.
Nonetheless, there are reasons for optimism. Today approximately 164,000 Iraqi police and soldiers (of which about 100,000 are trained and equipped) and an additional 74,000 facility protection forces are performing a wide variety of security missions. Equipment is being delivered. Training is on track and increasing in capacity. Infrastructure is being repaired. Command and control structures and institutions are being reestablished.
Most important, Iraqi security forces are in the fight -- so much so that they are suffering substantial casualties as they take on more and more of the burdens to achieve security in their country. Since Jan. 1 more than 700 Iraqi security force members have been killed, and hundreds of Iraqis seeking to volunteer for the police and military have been killed as well.
Six battalions of the Iraqi regular army and the Iraqi Intervention Force are now conducting operations. Two of these battalions, along with the Iraqi commando battalion, the counterterrorist force, two Iraqi National Guard battalions and thousands of policemen recently contributed to successful operations in Najaf. Their readiness to enter and clear the Imam Ali shrine was undoubtedly a key factor in enabling Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani to persuade members of the Mahdi militia to lay down their arms and leave the shrine.
In another highly successful operation several days ago, the Iraqi counterterrorist force conducted early-morning raids in Najaf that resulted in the capture of several senior lieutenants and 40 other members of that militia, and the seizure of enough weapons to fill nearly four 7 1/2-ton dump trucks.
Within the next 60 days, six more regular army and six additional Intervention Force battalions will become operational. Nine more regular army battalions will complete training in January, in time to help with security missions during the Iraqi elections at the end of that month.
Iraqi National Guard battalions have also been active in recent months. Some 40 of the 45 existing battalions -- generally all except those in the Fallujah-Ramadi area -- are conducting operations on a daily basis, most alongside coalition forces, but many independently. Progress has also been made in police training. In the past week alone, some 1,100 graduated from the basic policing course and five specialty courses. By early spring, nine academies in Iraq and one in Jordan will be graduating a total of 5,000 police each month from the eight-week course, which stresses patrolling and investigative skills, substantive and procedural legal knowledge, and proper use of force and weaponry, as well as pride in the profession and adherence to the police code of conduct.
Iraq's borders are long, stretching more than 2,200 miles. Reducing the flow of extremists and their resources across the borders is critical to success in the counterinsurgency. As a result, with support from the Department of Homeland Security, specialized training for Iraq's border enforcement elements began earlier this month in Jordan.
Regional academies in Iraq have begun training as well, and more will come online soon. In the months ahead, the 16,000-strong border force will expand to 24,000 and then 32,000. In addition, these forces will be provided with modern technology, including vehicle X-ray machines, explosive-detection devices and ground sensors.
Outfitting hundreds of thousands of new Iraqi security forces is difficult and complex, and many of the units are not yet fully equipped. But equipment has begun flowing. Since July 1, for example, more than 39,000 weapons and 22 million rounds of ammunition have been delivered to Iraqi forces, in addition to 42,000 sets of body armor, 4,400 vehicles, 16,000 radios and more than 235,000 uniforms.
Considerable progress is also being made in the reconstruction and refurbishing of infrastructure for Iraq's security forces. Some $1 billion in construction to support this effort has been completed or is underway, and five Iraqi bases are already occupied by entire infantry brigades.
Numbers alone cannot convey the full story. The human dimension of this effort is crucial. The enemies of Iraq recognize how much is at stake as Iraq reestablishes its security forces. Insurgents and foreign fighters continue to mount barbaric attacks against police stations, recruiting centers and military installations, even though the vast majority of the population deplores such attacks. Yet despite the sensational attacks, there is no shortage of qualified recruits volunteering to join Iraqi security forces. In the past couple of months, more than 7,500 Iraqi men have signed up for the army and are preparing to report for basic training to fill out the final nine battalions of the Iraqi regular army. Some 3,500 new police recruits just reported for training in various locations. And two days after the recent bombing on a street outside a police recruiting location in Baghdad, hundreds of Iraqis were once again lined up inside the force protection walls at another location -- where they were greeted by interim Prime Minister Ayad Allawi.
I meet with Iraqi security force leaders every day. Though some have given in to acts of intimidation, many are displaying courage and resilience in the face of repeated threats and attacks on them, their families and their comrades. I have seen their determination and their desire to assume the full burden of security tasks for Iraq.
There will be more tough times, frustration and disappointment along the way. It is likely that insurgent attacks will escalate as Iraq's elections approach. Iraq's security forces are, however, developing steadily and they are in the fight. Momentum has gathered in recent months. With strong Iraqi leaders out front and with continued coalition -- and now NATO -- support, this trend will continue. It will not be easy, but few worthwhile things are.

The writer, an Army lieutenant general, commands the Multinational Security Transition Command in Iraq. He previously commanded the 101st Airborne Division, which was deployed in Iraq from March 2003 until February 2004.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49283-2004Sep25.html
-end-

So today Sept 11 2007 I see this ......


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1780778

Interesting listening to General Petreaus yesterday Sept 10th and today Sept 11th 2007 how he seems to be once again emphasizing that all this current Iraqi 'progress' is being made just recently, just as he slanted his 2004 Op Ed.

A few more links from the memory hole ....

CNN ....
Powell: Troops could begin leaving Iraq this year
Secretary of state says withdrawals depend on Iraqi role
Thursday, January 13, 2005 Posted: 1:13 AM EST (0613 GMT)
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/01/12/powell.troops.iraq/index.html

Gates sees possibility of some U.S. troops leaving Iraq by end of 2007
Plan depends on new forces curbing violence in Baghdad
By John Holusha
Published: February 6, 2007
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/02/06/news/cong.php

Bush Prepares Exit From Iraq
Monday, July 12, 2004
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,125313,00.html

Rumsfeld: U.S. Troops Might Begin Leaving Iraq by January; Two Car Bombs Explode in Baghdad - Part 1.
Source: The America's Intelligence Wire
Publication Date: 01-OCT-04
http://www.accessmylibrary.com/premium/0286/0286-13632088.html

CONDI HOPEFUL GIS CAN START LEAVING IRAQ THIS YEAR
The New York Post, Sports+Late City Final; Pg. 10
March 27, 2006
Geoff Earle
http://alacarte.lexisnexis.com/partners/int/google/landingpage.asp?id=11066007&mtid=1&ws=9j0hDk1UboE=&ws_pub=The%20New%20York%20Post&ws_date=March%2027,%202006&ws_len=150&ws_lni=4JK5-4P30-TWCM-K21M-00000-00&ws_title=CONDI%20HOPEFUL%20GIS%20CAN%20START&ws_refer=http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=US+Troops+leaving+Iraq&as_ldate=2003&as_hdate=2006&hl=en&um=1&sa=N&start=60

Chalabi: U.S. Troops Could Leave Iraq in '06
Friday, November 11, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,175370,00.html

US general sees significant withdrawal in Iraq
By Peter Spiegel in London and Demetri Sevastopulo in Washington
Published: August 24 2005 21:46 | Last updated: August 24 2005
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9f81fef2-14de-11da-9df1-00000e2511c8.html

And Today Sept 11 2007 I see this ......


Petraeus outlines troop withdrawal plans
By DAVID ESPO, Associated Press Writer Tue Sep 11,2007 1:44 AM ET
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070911/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq_205

Wash/Rinse/Repeat.

I'll end with this ..... a refresher course on PNAC ..... just for 9/11 sake .....

A brief history of the PNAC: a refresher
http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m29153

Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just another corner turned in Iraq. Dizzy yet?
Isn't it amazing that this time the 'progress' in Iraq is so recent, just the last few weeks, so unfortunately wasn't picked up by that GAO report?

Well, we know what we get when the b.s. hits the spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Beyond Dizzy ......
In fact I forgot to ad the original Washington OP-Ed link to the story above (freaking neo-cons, hard to keep up with them sometimes!) .... corrected now. Yea spin spin spin .... I have the TV (Petreaus-CSPAN) on mute now, heard it all before, but Barbra Boxer earlier reminded me of Petraeus's Op Ed back in 2004 .... had to go read it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. See, that's the problem, we keep turning corners and end up where we
started. Somebody needs to give these assholes a map.:hi:
:kick:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's a completely logical explanation....
he really means it this time. No, really. He really, REALLY means it this time. We're making terrific progress. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Here's my favorite image from yesterday ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. S'funny, We The People want us out of Iraq, the troops certainly want to be out of Iraq,
and especially the Iraqis want us out of Iraq, seems the only people that don't want us out of Iraq are the corporate whore's that claim to be our leaders in DC and the "johns" that pay them.

I wonder why that would be?:shrug:
:kick: & R


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. .........

World Oil Reserves

I know you know and most of DU ... but sometimes this stuff should be kept simple huh? Peace. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. And tonight I read this ....... from the AP .....
Officials: Bush to Announce Troop Cut
By MATTHEW LEE and ANNE FLAHERTY – 26 minutes ago
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hcWJu9bbzrJZ7uNHjvMn0BuTGqHQ

Round and round we go ...... :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Down and down it goes...
Why aren't people dragging these assholes on into the streets and hanging them from the lampposts?:banghead:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Now now peaceful resistance ....... my friend .....
anyway Kucinich is my first choice too :toast: ..... and I just glanced up at the time of your post here greyhound 9:11 pm on 911 !!

Tue Sep-11-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #9 ....... wonder if it means anything :shrug: ........ naaaaaaaaaaa. Peace. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I didn't notice that. Does it strike you that what has been done since
that terrible day has removed all meaning from it? They've taken that unity and sorrow and sullied to push their agenda, it doesn't mean anything now.

Ms. Greyhound & I took the day off and haven't spent any money, but as far as I can tell, we're the only ones, and we live in one of the most truly liberal cities in the nation.

How ironic that this corporate media circus took place today.

Peace. Now. :patriot:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
15.  An excerpt from the last link in the OP above .....
concerning PNAC .....

"These guys drew up a plan for using our role as last remaining super power to expand their respective global markets through force. Specifically, their published documents call for the violent overthrow of regimes around the world that weren’t friendly to their business interests. The plan, as it was drawn out, called for the toppling of Saddam Hussein and seizing control of the Iraqi oil fields. Also, the regime of Afghanistan had to be deposed in order to construct a pipeline to secure access to the natural gas reserves of Central Asia. Once the energy resources were secured, the next step in the plan was to create an archepelago of military bases throught the Middle East and Central Asia as a staging point for further operations including the toppling of Iran and Syria.

On page 52 of a document published by them called Rebuilding America’s Defenses (.pdf), they stated that this plan for global corporate domination hinged upon "a catalyzing catastrophic event, similar to a new Pearl Harbor".
-snip-

Hence 911 'happened' intentional or otherwise and at this point really is of no consequence (except that whoever was responsible needs to be brought to justice) And the old questions come up ..... Why did we invade Iraq who had nothing to do with 911? Where is Osoma Bin Forgotten? Why were our war dawgs called off his trail at Tora Bora? ....... Why did the Bush administration block any investigation of 911 for like a year and a half after the event? On and on and on and on ....

Anyway through it all, these "coincidences" or however anyone wants to frame the story ...... This PNAC agenda ... keeps on magically coming about in the real world.

And yea ..... America is still too busy with Dancing with the Stars, Sunday Football, Partying on the weekends, to take time out, be adults and get our house in order. Hey I like having a good time just like anyone, but sometimes priorities need to be set. And I like you just don't see enough of that happening around us yet, hang in there. Peace to you and the Ms., always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. GENERAL BETRAYUS
:hi:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
13. kickin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC