Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How could 9-11 have been prevented ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Wiregrass Willie Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:23 PM
Original message
How could 9-11 have been prevented ?
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 05:24 PM by Wiregrass Willie
By the spending of $27 by the airlines.



These locks cost $6.56.

Had each one of those four cockpit doors been locked, there would have been no 9-11.

This may seem like hindsight, but it really shouldn't be. Back in the early 1970s, there was a rash of passenger plane hijackings in which the hijacker would enter the cockpit and demand to be taken to Cuba. Why were the airlines so remiss in locking the doors a long time before 9-11 ?

Could it be that airline pilots consider it a perk to be able to fondle the stewardesses while on the job ? Probably. I can't think of another reason not to have locked the doors a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. So when the hijackers start killing passengers one by one...
the pilots aren't going to let them into the cockpit? That's the scenario I see happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. So what
Loss of the airplane would result in every passenger dying and possible collateral damage on the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yes and they shouldn't open the door even in that event.
And who is to say the passengers wouldn't overwhelm and kill the hijackers? You can bet your ass I wouldn't just let them systematically kill me or my family or even a bunch of strangers without putting up one hell of a fight. I would never go out like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Most hijackers don't want to die, they want to get somewhere. They may *have* a bomb
but they just want to use it for itimidation purposes. They're not going to blow themselves up in the sky. Most of them know that if they start shooting wildly, they risk depressurizing or decompressing the cabin, which isn't going to work out well for them either. They don't want to get sucked out of the plane at 30,000 feet either.

They might start killing passengers, but as long as the pilot is in control of the plane and can't be gotten to, it's eventually gonna land and the hijacker is gonna pay. The pilot can also do a couple moves like dipping the wings or a quick diving or turning motion to keep the hijackers unsteady... like creating their own 'turbulence' or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. So you're saying the pilots are male, and the flight attendants female?
Hmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Women can fondle men, you know
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. If Al Gore had been in the WH! It's all the conservatives fault!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That was going to be my answer!!!
Cheney did it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. True. If Al Gore had been in the WH, the 9/11 attacks would not have
happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. damn that was my thought the minute i saw this thread!! Gore..
and my thought forever will be Gore..my co-workers would still be alive and myneighbors son would still be alive..and all the people lost in my hometown would all be alive.

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Mine too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:32 PM
Original message
If your pretzeldent had taken the August PDB to heart and done something
then instead of doing nothing? Do I win a cookie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. That, or if the administration had simply acted on the information that the attack was coming.
"Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States." It doesn't get much clearer than that.

You're right, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. it could have been prevented by keeping the perpetrators out of our government.
Unfortunately not one senator would stand up for the truth when it counted and those who stole the power got what they wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. You beat me to it
If they hadn't gotten away with stealing the 2000 vote, all of the atrocities these criminals have committed would have been prevented. Iraq and 9/11 were both part of the same inside job. Yet they don't get impeached, much less thrown into chains like they should be. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. in 2001 all cockpit doors were locked on American Airlines..on those aircraft..
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 05:36 PM by flyarm
AND ALL AMERICAN AIRLINES AIRCRAFT...all AA flight crew had keys to the locks..

the flight attend in front of flight 11 had their throats cut ..i am sure the hijackers took their cockpit keys..to enter the Cockpit..

IT WAS PROCEEDURE AT PUSH BACK FROM GATE THAT ALL COCKPIT DOORS WERE LOCKED!
I CAN'T SPEAK FOR uNITED BUT I BELIEVE THEY HAD THE SAME PROCEEDURES AS WE DID ..THEY WERE FEDERAL PROCEEDURES!

please do not say something you have no knowledge of.

fly ..an American Airlines flight attendant ..now retired..2001 Flight Attendant of the year for AA NYC base
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Thanks.
I honestly didn't know that they had ever locked cabin doors. And I remember flying up in the cockpit of a DC-3 as a kid. Those days are gone.

I wasn't saying locking doors would be wrong, in my post. But that locking the door might not be how we could prevent another 9/11 type of hijack.


Phew. I was hoping the question wasn't broader. Because the subject line in the original post is a very complex answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. all cockpit doors have been locked for a very very long time..in the 70's...
i can't remember what year exactly but i flew 33 yrs and as long as i can remember the doors have had locks..i tend to remember it was around 73-74..but i just can't remember when they were put on. but it has been a very long time.

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiregrass Willie Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Locking it from the outside would have been stupid
Why would cutting the attendants throat open a lock INSIDE the cockpit, which is where it obviously was needed ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. the flight attendants had keys!
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 07:28 PM by flyarm
the doors were auto locked..there was talk around the millenium about putting a bar across the door on the inside but repugs on behalf of the airlines turned their noses up on that idea.

blame it on the repigs!! and the airlines ...$$$$$$$$$ you know.

and remember at that time..not post 9/11 but pre 9/11 all hijackings were to go somewhere..the flight attend had ways to communicate with the cockpit there were hijackers..so the cockpit would be prepared..i can't say how that would breach security..and i won't do that..but having hijackers take over the aircraft was not in proceedures...the cockpit was to get the plane down asap..the proceedure was to get the plane on the ground.

hindsight is brilliant..and if we had had the warnings we were supposed to get of which this white house did not do..we would have had a forewarning..and proceedures could have been put in place of the particular warnings they had..but we never got warnings from this white house through the state dept or the DOT..( nor did the secretary of transportation get told of the warnings.... head of DOT was Norman Minetta..and he testified this to the 9/11 commission)





fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Or they could have stopped them before they got on the fucking planes.
Not like they didn't have ample evidence to do so, plus warnings from all over the world that something was going to happen USING PLANES, plus people watching the suspects, etc. etc. etc.

LIHOP at the very LEAST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. If Phill Gramm had been defeated
because he single handedly blocked the tightening of offshore banking that would have closed the funding conduits that were used to bankroll the plot.

Gramm was protecting Enron, which was using those same conduits to launder stockholder money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. Or Bush could have taken the threats of terrorism seriously
instead of ignoring them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. simpler solution: not giving expedited visas to Saudis on terror watch list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. indeed. the whole Saudi visa express program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. when you absolutely positively need a terrorist attack overnight, call Saudi Express...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. the line about the pilots fondling the flight attendants--you win the prize
for one of the stupidest posts i've ever read on du.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. thank you..i wholeheartedly agree!..and i find it disgusting!!..
flight crews i flew with for 33 years are extrememly professional..they are there to save lives, and will put their own lives on the line to save lives.

and in 33 yrs i never had a pilot be anything but professional...nor a flight attendant.

total nonsense.

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC