Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Radio Frequencies Help Burn Salt Water (Energy Source?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:58 PM
Original message
Radio Frequencies Help Burn Salt Water (Energy Source?)
ERIE, Pa. - An Erie cancer researcher has found a way to burn salt water, a novel invention that is being touted by one chemist as the "most remarkable" water science discovery in a century.

John Kanzius happened upon the discovery accidentally when he tried to desalinate seawater with a radio-frequency generator he developed to treat cancer. He discovered that as long as the salt water was exposed to the radio frequencies, it would burn.

The discovery has scientists excited by the prospect of using salt water, the most abundant resource on earth, as a fuel.

Rustum Roy, a Penn State University chemist, has held demonstrations at his State College lab to confirm his own observations.

The radio frequencies act to weaken the bonds between the elements that make up salt water, releasing the hydrogen, Roy said. Once ignited, the hydrogen will burn as long as it is exposed to the frequencies, he said.

The discovery is "the most remarkable in water science in 100 years," Roy said.

http://green.yahoo.com/index.php?q=node/1570
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. This was discussed and debunked at some length a week or so ago here.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. It doesn't produce more energy than it consumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Oh, Really?
Did you quit school in the 3rd grade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. No comment on the amount of energy needed
to generate those radio frequencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretty_lies Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Jesus, What Bullshit
Please explain how you're going to extract more energy from that hydrogen than you put in to produce it.

I feel like beating this fellow over the head with my well-worn 5th edition of Atkins' Physical Chemistry.



Gotta love that "Penn State Chemist" too, here's his recent publications: with a notable focus on BULLSHIT like homeopathy, colloidal silver and religion in science...

"Ultradilute Ag-Aquasols with extraordinary bactericidal properties: the role of the system Ag-O-H2O," Materials Research Innovations, Volume 11, Number 1, pp. 3-18 (March 2007).

R. Roy, M. R. Hoover, A.S. Bhalla, T. Slawecki, S. Dey, W. Cao, J. Li, S. Bhaskar,

“The Structure of Liquid Water; Novel Insights from Materials Research; Potential Relevance to Homeopathy,” Materials Research Innovations, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp. 577-608 (December 2005)
Rustum Roy, William A. Tiller, Iris Bell, and M. Richard Hoover

"Scientism and Technology as Religions," Zygon, Journal of Religion & Science, Dec. 2005

"Expanding the Framework: Taking Back Religion from Technology and Theology from Science," Fourth Yoko Civilization International Conference, Science and Religion in the Age of Crisis, Aug. 2005.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good old Airhead 101 "science"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. WTF
do many on this site attack alternative energy research. Yes, it may not be feasible now, but what about the future. Sheesh, sometimes I feel like I'm on another site saying that solar, wind, hydro, etc. aren't workable.:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Sorry friend, but it's just science
To be useful as an energy source this "process" would have to violate a couple of physical laws. Sure, there are skeptics that will criticize just about every scientific endeavor (mostly because they cannot understand the thing they are criticizing), but you won't find too many of those on DU.

You cannot get more energy out of this process than you put in. The heat energy produced simply CANNOT exceed the energy used to produce the RF. Thus, as an energy source it's pretty much a waste of time. And energy. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. There's a difference between PRODUCING alternative energy, and energy conversion and storage...
This system is a for CONVERTING ENERGY, not PRODUCING IT. All your other examples involve using external sources to produce the energy, in the case of Solar, the Sun, in the case of Wind, well, wind, hydro uses gravity, and you didn't mention geothermal, which uses Earth.

Anyone touting things like the "hydrogen" economy, or just plain pseudoscience aren't helping, to put it mildly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Traveling_Home Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Don't judge too quickly - Cancer Treatrment
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 07:18 PM by Traveling_Home
http://www.wkyc.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=73068

Inventor from Erie, P.A. teams up with leading cancer center.
The work has been quietly been going on for the last three years in a
no-frills laboratory in Erie, Pennsylvania. Inventor, John Kanzius,
working with Jim and Charlie Rutkowski, have been perfecting a device
that will kill cancer cells with a radio frequency.


Here's another link for the Energy Source possibility
http://www.physorg.com/news108666600.html

Here's the story on the cancer research

========================================

http://www.wkyc.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=73068

This humble workspace could soon become the epicenter of one of the
most stunning scientific breakthroughs in cancer treatment in years.


Using the Kanzius RF machine and special nanoparticles, it appears
that cancer cells can be targeted and killed without harming the rest
of the body.


This is a deeply personal mission for John Kanzius. He is struggling
to beat leaukemia. And he knows firsthand how tough standard
treatments like chemotherapy and radiation can be on the body.


Kanzius told Channel 3's Mike O'Mara that, "If this ends up working
they way it looks, it really could be the holy grail of cancer
research."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. I saw it on the TV. Sure enough salt water burns when attached to
a continuous source of energy in the radio frequency. Don't know how much energy is actually produced..if any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. AW, JEEZ ... NOT THIS SHIT AGAIN ...
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 07:52 PM by eppur_se_muova
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. Are they planning on igniting the seas? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC