Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nancy Pelosi's Tough Talk Statement on Petraeus Report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:15 PM
Original message
Nancy Pelosi's Tough Talk Statement on Petraeus Report
Contact: Brendan Daly or Nadeam Elshami both of the Office of the Speaker of the House, +1-202-226-7616


WASHINGTON, Sept. 11 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Speaker Nancy Pelosi released the following statement today after meeting at the White House with President Bush on Iraq:


"President Bush's policy announced by General Petraeus is a path to 10 more years of war in Iraq. General Petraeus' testimony to Congress drew a bright line: redeployment is not an option; endless war in Iraq is the Administration's only option.


"Under the Bush plan, 130,000 Americans will remain in harm's way in Iraq at a cost of hundreds of billions of additional taxpayer dollars. This status quo policy was rejected by General James Jones, whose recent report stated that significant force reductions are possible and that we must reduce our military footprint in Iraq.


"The Bush-Petraeus plan of 130,000 Americans in Iraq for 10 more years is not a reduction in our footprint; it is an insult to the intelligence of the American people to call that a new direction. It is a status quo plan that tells the Iraqi government that they do not need to change.


"The American people long ago rejected the President's plan to stay in Iraq, which is why they voted for a New Direction in 2006. Yet, with his veto pen and the 60-vote hurdle in the Senate, the President is preventing the redeployment of our troops, the rebuilding of our military, and the refocusing of our nation's efforts on fighting terrorism."


SOURCE Office of the Speaker of the House


-0-

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sounds great, Nancy. SO NOW WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? No more empty words...we've fallen for the "tough talk, then bend over for Bush" routine too many times for it to work anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Warning: language and content and blithering.
What the fuck is she talking "redeployment"? Does no one speak effen ENGLISH any more?

WE DON'T WANT TO REDEPLOY OUR PEOPLE, NANCY. WE WANT THEM HOME.

I am so f#cking tired of being diplomatic with these clueless, sheltered, privileged grumble mumble argh.


Time to take a walk. :grr::grr: :grr::grr::grr::grr: :grr::grr::grr::grr: :grr::grr::grr::grr: :grr::grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are WE going to pressure the moderate Republicans?
That's what has to happen. When are we going to do what they're asking to be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stimbox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. If you live in a Republican district, then go for it.
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 10:43 PM by stimbox
Pelosi is our Congresscritter, so we pressure her and she fuckin' ignores us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. They all have their "prepared" statements but ...
What about some action?

STOP THIS WAR AND BRING OUR TROOPS HOME!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. You're toast, sister.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Whew. And to think I was worried Pelosi wasn't going to do her job.
She had a nice excuse written out the whole time. Way to stand up, Nancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drix Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Talk Is Cheap.
Cut the funding and impeach already! No more excuses. I want to see some "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!"attitude. No whining about votes. Shut the government down if you have to, but damn it, actually DO SOMETHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Timw for action- and after this complete and embarrassing sham
that bush bestowed upon us- it is time for them to act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is that her way of asking for another "private" dinner with...
the bu$he$?

We all know what happened after the last one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. You don't need 67 votes to block additional funding.
The fact that people like Pelosi and Biden keep claiming their hands are tied when they aren't is very telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. If I remember the rules correctly
it only takes ONE, that's ONE to stop a bill. Ask Robert Byrd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Whaa whaa, whaa whaa. That's going to scare the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. No matter what the Democrats do, they don't have the votes to ..
override a veto. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. After all the hype and buildup- bush's decision is to do NOTHING. Pelosi MUST
get back to what she promised and end this war.

Bush will announce that he is staying the course. Congress must act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. Enough talk. Time for action or step aside and let someone else lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC