Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The 9-11 question rarely heard: What would YOU have done to prevent a 9-11 event?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:26 AM
Original message
The 9-11 question rarely heard: What would YOU have done to prevent a 9-11 event?
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 11:53 AM by blm
What would YOU have done if YOU were in a position of power to prevent the growing threat of global terror?

We all know so much more now about the last 4 decades of government deceit that led our nation to that day, but, what have we learned that would inform us of what COULD have been done to prevent it and any terror event of the last 30 years AND what should be done now to stop a FUTURE 9-11 type event?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. eliminate goddamn box cutters from the acceptable carry-on items list
for one thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. I was thinking about that earlier
today when they were talking about acceptable dress code for southwest.

Simply Amazing Concept.."eliminating box-cutters"..much too complicated for condi&co.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Airline safety.
Proper locks and doors would have prevented 9-11.

More money, people for law enforcemnt.

That's pretty much it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. No major policy changes or greater scrutiny of decades of covert operations?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Not really, no.
Like I said, more money/people in law enforcement. That would include clearing incompetent people out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. The system worked
The warning bells, even on specific people, were ringing. Dedicated government workders like FBI Agent Coleen Rowley were screaming, for example, about Moussoui, but the loyal Bushie in DC squished her applications for search warrants. He got a Medal of Freedom and a bonus, by the way.

Bush appointees in DC were ignoring the warnings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Because what we thought then we
now know from their MO that they MIHOP..fucking desperate HomicidalOILGrabbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Those people were in DC when they shouldn't have been, though.
In fact, some of them should've been in jail after the crimes of office committed during Bush1. Crimes that just HAPPENED to have included abetting terror networks (IranContra, BCCI, CIA drugrunning, Iraqgate all exposed the funding of terrorism and/or the funding of Saddam's dictatorial ventures).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. Yes, the system worked
It delivered warnings with enough accuracy and detail to prevent this from happening. The rank-and-file guys did their job. Unfortunately, it delivered them to a head-up-the-ass, incompetent "elected" administration and their appointed officers that were picked based on loyalty and fanatisism instead of competence. And at crunch time...

Well, it was either MIHOP or LIHOP or the end result of a determined and extended process of incompetence.



If the fire alarm goes off and you're too dumb to leave the burning house, getting a louder alarm isn't going to help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. Do you think those incompetents in charge couldn't have been stopped
from being in that position long before the fire?

You don't think that Bush2 could have been prevented from taking office if open accountable government had been the past guide for this nation's direction?


http://consortiumnews.com/2006/111106.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
60. Oh, yeah, that issue affects a whole bunch of things
The topic is about 9/11, though.

I mean, yeah, if Reagan had been impeached and removed from office for trading arms for hostages with Iran in 1981, the entire political landscape would have shifted. Iraq may have never invaded Kuwait in 1991, so the US would not have had a military footprint in Saudi Arabia that would ultimately have had Bin Laden turn the anti-Soviet guerrilla organization he make in Afghanistan against us.

Or if Gerald Ford nad nailed Nixon to the wall instead of issuing a pardon. That would have chilled illegal activities by the executive branch for quite a while, and Reagan/Bush would have behaved.

Or if the Iran-Contra scandal had resulted in force resignations/impeachment of Bush Sr. and Reagan. That would have tarnished the Bush Legacy, keeping Dubya out of politics and safely in vodka and coke until his head exploded in some hotel in Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. Exactly - and why accountability is CRUCIAL - without it we will get more 9-11s
and a firmly fascist government without even the veneer of democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. No argument from me.
I've stated several times here that the USS Constitution has both plenty of room on her yardarms and plenty of rope to hang traitors.

This makes interesting reading:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_Wing_Authoritarianism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_dominance_orientation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Al Gore has a nice section in Assault on Reason
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 11:29 AM by LSK
Where if they just did some basic cross referencing and looking up under existing laws they could have figured it out and stopped it.

Oh and actually listening to Richard Clarke might have been a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. They didn't really want to stop it
Look at how much the bush regime has profited from 9/11 do you really think they wanted to stop it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
26. Al Gore's Brillance Again..
Damn! What we could have and Don't! And I mean in a position of Power for The People. I love that we do have him and Kerry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. For starters
Lets stop inflicting our views, morals, and "freedoms" on other nations. Stop occupying sovergin nations. Stop bombing countries and killing innocents and then saying it is to protect us.

That is why they hate us. They don't give a shit about our "freedoms".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. That's a strong point. And speaks to DECADES of wrong policies that led straight
to 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. "hate us for our freedoms"...is
something the Orwellian monsters came up to get Americans excited about before they took them away. Turns out our fucking "morals" aren't so hot after all.

Welcome to DU, againes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obnoxiousdrunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
43. BINGO !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Read my Presidential Daily Briefings, for starters.
Take people like Richard Clarke seriously.
Not ignore Al Qaeda just because Bill Clinton thought they were a threat and I didn't want to do anything he did.
Actually try to learn something about the Middle East.
Try to understand what provokes acts of terrorism in the first place.
Not "stovepipe" the intelligence services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. A diplomat like Jimmy
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 12:05 PM by zidzi
Carter could have figured this out because he among others actually had America's interests at heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Don't prop up dictators & totalitarian regimes just for economic expedience
Take away their reasons for existing as terrorists.
Consider their complaints honestly and see if they have merit.
What makes them terrorists are the tactics - the killing of innocents - which is illegal.
They should be held accountable for these crimes.
Avoid turning the pursuit of justice into a war of ideology.
Promote programs like the Peace Corp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. I agree with that. 9-11 began long ago with those covert operations
that actually ended up FUNDING the growing global terror movement.

To prop up dictators? Most definitely. But also as part of the longterm goal to gain control of the world's resources as the key to gaining control of the world's citizenry. Global fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. My job, plain and simple.
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 11:35 AM by liberalmuse
Listen to intelligence and paid serious attention to the fucking memo 'bin Laden Determined to Strike the U.S.', for one. I wouldn't have taken the FBI off of bin Laden survelliance, or made it easier for terrorists to launder money via international banks, like Bush did when he chucked out much of Clinton's anti-terrorist legislation. I would have also implemented the suggestions in the Hart/Rudman report--that was a very disturbing albeit accurate prediction of 9-11 two years before the fact. If we want to stop a future 9-11 event, we need to get Bush/Cheney out of office and ensure that those with highly vested interest in the military/industrial complex do not gain political office EVER. It's too bad we didn't know about Operation Northwoods until after 9-11--at least it wasn't very highly publicized until then. Americans need to know what corrupt government is capable of. They would gladly sacrifice millions of American lives if it puts an extra dime in their pockets. What we did wrong is not take to the streets en masse on December 9, 2000. That was the day America as we knew it was raped, beaten, tossed in a ditch and left for dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
27. Disgusting how corporate media deep-sixed the Operation Northwoods revelation.
It's obvious that controlling the corporate media has BEEN a big part of furthering the fascist agenda that's been enacted over the last 2 decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
37. I know that now..too. That was
before I even had a computer and I had to Feel The Pain practically alone..

"What we did wrong is not take to the streets en masse on December 9, 2000. That was the day America as we knew it was raped, beaten, tossed in a ditch and left for dead."

Maybe we can make up for it somehow someway.

We sure took to the streets on Feb 15, 2003 all over the World but the coporatemediawhores played it down, of course, they wanted WAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. Some generic preventives...
...like not pursuing asinine and destructive foreign policies.

But specifically: read the presidential daily briefing. Pay attention to terrorist threats (these were studiously ignored by bushco). Assign an individual over all the security agencies to coordinate their activities and funnel the information to those who can act on it -- that individual would be the national security advisor -- so I'd have to hire someone competent in that role. When that (competent) individual expresses concern and urgency, act on it.

Just a few obvious things that would have been different under almost any other administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
38. That wouldn't have wanted it to happen..
"Just a few obvious things that would have been different under almost any other administration."

As opposed to the one we had that did want it and wanted it badly..

Couldn't be bothered, though, to stop reading.."My Pet Goat" to go out and simulate a "leader".



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. First, since hijackings had been well known for over 30 years,
I'd have mandated planes be constructed with reinforced and locking cockpit doors at least that long ago and amended the rules to keep that door locked unless the cockpit crew were exiting or entering for bathroom breaks.

Second, with a Wayback Machine, I'd have strangled Phil Gramm in his crib. He singlehandedly made sure that Clinton's legislation to close offshore banking conduits never made it out of committee, thus ensuring the 9/11 cells could be fully and easily funded. Gramm was protecting Enron, which was using those same conduits to launder money.

Third, I'd never have maintained bases in Saudi Arabia. That was an incredibly stupid thing to do in a country of zealots.

Fourth, were I world dictator, I'd never have allowed the massive violation of human rights throughout the Middle East by dictators who were allowed free rein as long as they kept the oil flowing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Why even for then?
Every airliner I've ever been on has had a lavatory right behind the cockpit. Put the door on the aft side of that lav, put a few amenities--small fridge, warming oven, coffeepot with five gallons of water--in the flight crew area, and they'd only have to come out after the plane landed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. Banish the entire Bush family to the dark side of the moon. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. That'd be my call. AFTER exposing the entire fascist agenda fully, of course.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
40. You make me want to
listen to Pink Floyd right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. All Bush had to do was pick up a phone and warn the airlines. ..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
41. But, all he did was
go on vaca so he could clear important brush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. Elected Gore.
Technically, he was, but he never got to serve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
18. Clinton stopped the Millenium bombers with vague information ...
I think anyone who doesn't take the ABC (Anything But Clinton) method of handling terrorist threats could do something to try to stop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
23.  What President Clinton Was Doing
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 11:50 AM by AndyTiedye
The worst they managed to do under Clinton was blow up a few cars in the WTC parking garage — and they got caught.

Ordinary police work would have prevented this, if the FBI had been allowed to do it, but once Bush** got in it was "Hands off the Saudis".

Then there was the August 6, 2001 PDB that spelled out the threat. And Bush** ignored it and went on vacation.

Ashcroft was also ignoring all the warnings that came in from his people (and switching to government jets instead of commercial airliners for his personal travel).

When the attacks were going down, Bush** sat there reading "My Pet Goat". How did he know there wasn't a plane headed for that school?

Of course, once 9/11 happened, all questions about the legitimacy of Bush**'s pResidency evaporated.

9/11 was LIHOP or more likely MIHOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
25. I know! I know!
1. Enforce the laws on the books (the terrorists were here illegally).
2. Place safety before profits (flag the cash transaction, secure the airplanes so that they have police officers, secure cockpits so that they can't be overrun).

If we had done these two things, 9-11 would have never happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
28. Question IS "What did BUSH fail to do?" It is not about ME. I'm not the problem.
If I had been the Supreme Court's Resident, 9/11 would not have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
45. You can't think of anything YOU'D do differently in the 80s and 90s if YOU were
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 12:32 PM by blm
a lawmaker?

Seems to me that this nation has FAILED to come to terms with the LONG ROAD that led to 9-11. If they never track it back to its key junctures, then how is it ever to be dealt with effectively and in ways that would ensure honest assessment and accountability and that it would be less likely to occur again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
29. I already did it
My vote for Al Gore in 2000 was the most powerful thing I could have done to prevent 9/11!

-85% Jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
30. Reinforced the Bulkhead doors then look at how El Al does security
Reinforcing the bulkhead doors is something that should have been done after all of the hijackings in the 60's. If I got a memo about bin ladin determined to strike withing the US using airplanes, I just might have let the FBI director know about it, and let the FBI warn the airlines.

I believe that El Al has never had a flight hijacked, one of the only airlines that has been around for a while that can say that. It is all due to security at the airport and around the planes. The fact that an Israli airline that is based in the middle east has never been hijacked is pretty amazing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
32. Dismantle the CIA
Since They were the ones that carried out 9/11.............


Put heavy locks on all cockpit doors, that would have been enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #32
47. Dismantle the CIA 'cell' loyal to Poppy Bush who abetted terrorism for decades?
I would track that cell and eliminate them in the 90s if I had the power to do so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
36. Implement Dennis Kucinich's foreign policy (nm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
39. I would have hunted down and killed OBL in the years 1992 thru 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Ah Ye-ah..I'm thinking if they
didn't have osama bin hiden they would have found another boogie to carry out their mission of terrorism to begin bombing the ME..but that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. True - Poppy Bush's abetting of terror networks was more than Bin Ladens group.
Abu Nidal was also a recipient of funding via BCCI. And surely there were more, especially those in control of the opium crops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. You know sooo much
history about these fascists! And right..I'm sure they had back-up plans to their back-up plans. They're all about leaving nothing to fate but then FATE steps in and says .."Whoa buster!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
48. Stimulating question, blm.
And now that I've read all the other responses..

Who knows what the buSHITS knew even before the Aug 6th, 2001 Memo? I'm surprised we even get to know about that infamous MEMO. I'm sure they wouldn't want that known. The corporatemedia if they were a Free Press would be Pounding that from the get go and we would never have to endure buSHIT for a second term. It all goes back to the US corporatemediawhores..they're a Scourge on America besides being lazy fuckers.

The Fairness Doctrine might have saved 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Excellent point. I would submit that most people have no idea WHY we were
even ABLE to see that Presidential briefing document in the first place.

A dogged senator kept taking the Reagan and Bush1 administrations to court to gain access to documents they regularly kept hidden from congress. That was one important court battle won by the good guys back then.

This is why Democrats should keep the pressure up no matter what - there are always gains to be made if you stick to siding with the constitution and government accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. Bravo to the Congress who do..
"This is why Democrats should keep the pressure up no matter what - there are always gains to be made if you stick to siding with the constitution and government accountability."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
49. Assuming I was elected in 2000?
Knowing what I know now? The solution is obvious; order Mohammad Atta et al. arrested, detained, tried, and imprisoned.

If I only was allowed to know "There will be a terror attack involving airplanes and the WTC in September," I would order air marshals on every flight possible originating on the east coast during that month, warn the airlines, and divert all FBI resources to tracking down the hijackers.

Knowing nothing we didn't know then? Probably very little. Bureaucratic inertia is enormous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. And with the hindsight of what you know now, what would be your priority
back in the 80s or 90s that would have stopped the growing threat of global terrorism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. Starting with 1980, assuming I have Shadow Dictator powers or something:
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 01:09 PM by Kelly Rupert
I now know that the Soviet Union is going to collapse regardless of the course of the Afghan war. As such, I do not supply the jihadis there; rather I insert several moles, and order the CIA to begin tracking them as potential threats. Similarly, the threat of the Ayatollah is overblown; I do not supply Iraq. Moreover, I do not engage in overt actions in Lebanon; US soldiers do not need to be there To counter the rise of fundamentalist Islam, I encourage fair economic links to liberal, secular states. I engage in behind-the-scenes negotiations with both the Iranians and Libyans, and I offer favorable trade offers with minimal but progressively increasing strings attached.

Similarly, my aid to (and tariff rates regarding) the Saudis, Kuwaitis, and other "friendly" states in the region is dependent on the extent to which they meet extremely-mild liberalization benchmarks.

My aid to the Israelis is limited to defense. Any use of American funding I determine to be otherwise will be cut. Funding is also dependent on meeting benchmarks towards creation of a Palestinian state.

Regionalism, terrorism, jihad, and xenophobic nationalism can never be "stopped;" they're a natural reaction to the threat the unifying McWorld faces to every single traditional society. However, their influence can be marginalized--and that has always been done best, in my opinion, through a combination of respect and economic incentive to return the favor.

Also, I buy tech stock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. heh - pretty good answer -
and you don't have to be a dictator - just an honest Democratic lawmaker applying pressure and speaking to these realities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. There were plenty of people
in the government who actually cared about America and they knew about the volitile situation of that time. The August 6, 2001 MEMO was huge and airlines could have been warned to be on THE ALERT before the fact not After.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
54. Stop fucking in people's business that didn't want us in it
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 12:49 PM by shadowknows69
IE. troops in Saudi and various other middle eastern imperial efforts. They know it's all about the oil for us so they've made it all about fighting the Great Satan. This event wasn't a surprise to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #54
61. Nor to me. Anyone who bothered to READ the BCCI report and the documents
that provided the backdrop of IranContra could see where this was heading.

This is why accountability matters. Accountability for government corruption is the ONLY way that a citizen is truly shown respect by our leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
56. Implement Hart-Rudman
If it had been implemented as recommended, there's no way events leading up to 9/11 could have been ignored for so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
57. Let the FBI do their fucking jobs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
62. Repealed sanctions on Iraq during the '90s, removed American
bases from Saudi Arabia and stopped supporting Arabic dictators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
64. Listen to Richard Clarke
Listen to Sibel Edmonds.

NOT spend 8 months trying to figure out how to con the American people to let me attack Iraq.

Immediately fire anyone who said "Osama who?"

Work with domestic & international law enforcement to capture known terrorists for trial.

Not make the entire North American Air Defense "unavailable due to a training exercise" at any time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
65. Duh.. For one, Don't allow public access to plane's cockpit!
Okay, I see the plane engineers are doing that now. Oh, wow thanks. I guess they weren't getting paid enough to think of that before 9/11. Or too busy being vacationing millionaires. Yeah right, there was no way to predict a lunatic would try to take over a plane and crash it into something?!?!?!?

Seriously, it's just a matter of creating an atmosphere where competent people are expected to be in charge of high level positions, no politics, no ego fanatics, no nepotism, no ladder climbing junkies, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
67. Follow up on all the warnings we got
That would have led us to the hijackers. Though I'm not sure it could have been prevented. I consider the official story to be a conspiracy theory in itself - no way I believe everything happened the way they said it did. There were likely infiltrators in our government, and the possible connection to Cheney should be explored. What realy happened is probably in the middle of the extremes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. I think most of DU would agree about that.
And I think most of the country is heading in that direction, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
69. After Aug. 6 PDB, I'd have warned the flying public...
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 10:08 PM by Octafish
...alerted the nation's airports and police. At the same time, I'd put the military and all government agencies on alert.

One thing I certainly would not do is say is: "All right. You've covered your ass now."

Long-term, I'd have used the Peace Corps and all the other programs President Kennedy started to help the people in Asia, Africa, South America and other places fight hunger, poverty, disease, ignorance, etc. Places like the United States of America.

Being friends with people means living together in peace. That's easier to achieve if we work for the common good.



The Covered-Up Meeting

By Dan Froomkin
Special to washingtonpost.com
Monday, October 2, 2006; 1:12 PM

The "State of Denial" in the title of Bob Woodward's new book describes President Bush's ongoing refusal to see the true consequences of the war he launched in Iraq.

But one of the book's most notable revelations suggests that the Bush White House was in another state of denial more than five years ago, this one about the threat of terrorism before September 11, 2001.

If the omniscient narrator of Woodward's book is to be believed, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice waved off warnings that should by any reasonable standard have put the government on high alert for an al-Qaeda attack.
And in what looks like a potential administration cover-up, Rice and the other participants in that meeting apparently never mentioned it to anyone, including investigators for the 9/11 Commission.

SNIP…

And a month later, as Ron Suskind reported in his book, "The One Percent Doctrine," an unnamed CIA briefer flew to Bush's Texas ranch to call the president's attention personally to the now-famous Aug. 6, 2001, memo titled 'Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.' According to Suskind, Bush heard the briefer out and replied: "All right. You've covered your ass, now."

CONTINUED…

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/10/02/BL2006100200537.html



What would you do, blm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #69
72. The same thing I would've done years earlier - opened the books on BushInc.
That would have stopped the growing global terror networks as they would've been exposed in their countries for working FOR the Bush cabal they claimed as oppressors - their credibility would have taken an enormous hit.

The exposed books would have assured no Bush would ever get even NEAR the WH again, let alone get inside it.

This country NEEDS the books opened. A real truth and reconciliation hearing televised an EVERY NETWORK so that EVERY citizen can be learning the facts TOGETHER - unfiltered and untainted - just open books on ALL of it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
70. Showing up to work would have been a good start...
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
71. Since 9-11 was an inside job, I'm not sure what can be done to prevent it.
I'm looking for the neo cons to nuke an American city next!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC