Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NC School bans US Flag (among others)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:47 AM
Original message
NC School bans US Flag (among others)
Note, the ads and layout of this link really make for a hard-to-read page...

-----
SAMPSON COUNTY, N.C. – On the sixth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, students at one high school were not allowed to wear clothes with an American flag.

Under a new school rule, students at Hobbton High School are not allowed to wear items with flags, from any country, including the United States.

The new rule stems from a controversy over students wearing shirts bearing flags of other countries.

Link

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Seems fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh yeah.
Seen this sort of shit before. Kids want to start a homosexual support group, school doesn't let them, kids make an issue out of it, school bans all extracurricular activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. School motto: We're not happy until you're not happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Two words:
School uniforms

That used to be done in public schools. Then it went away. In the aftermath of that decision, right down to metal rock concert slogan-infested t-shirts and gang insignia, some are considering reimposing uniforms.

About bloody time. Count me in support of uniforms.

Then all this rubbish dialogue can go into the trash where it belongs.

Besides, why is any flag being sold as a piece of clothing to stain on?! It's a flag, not a shirt or blouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeineAhnung Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Say goodbye to common sense n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Would you care to elaborate on your comment?
I felt my argument, while not mired in deep explanations, contained at least a rudimentary explanation worthy of future discussion as needed.

One-liner throwaway responses are for jovial or sarcastic responses, or for television sitcoms. Not for any form of debate.

IMHO, of course.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. "Keine Ahnung", translated, mean's "I have no idea"
Therefore, you can potentially dismiss any future dialogue with said poster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. Squatch, translated, means "no sense of irony."
From the Abyssinian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. If the students fight and argue over the various flags, then
no one wears any flags.

This sort of solution to a problem is not new, nor does it lack "common sense."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. If students fight and argue over various gym equipment, then
nobody gets to use any gym equipment.

Problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Wrong. Stupid analogy. Gym equipment has no inherent political commentary
as do flags.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. So you're saying kids shouldn't comment on politics?
Just sports n' stuff?

You wouldn't be a gym teacher, would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. Um, no. That's not what I'm saying in the least.
I was specifically responding to how stupid of an analogy flags are to gym equipment.

One inherently has political content. The other does not.

That's all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. And then, by extension, you're saying it's perfectly acceptable
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 01:41 PM by Squatch
to ban any speech that has "inherent" political content.

Okie dokie, mein Führer!

Corrected for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. No, by extension I'm not saying that.
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 01:43 PM by Lex
I'm specifically explaining the difference between gym equipment (no political content) and flags on clothes (political content).

It'd be fine by me for them to wear whatever flag they want to wear.

But it's not okay to only ban certain flags and not others. Ban none or ban them all.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #48
54. Oh, really?
You'd be ok with a student wearing this flag in school?



As for: "I'm specifically explaining the difference between gym equipment and flags on clothes."

You can tell the difference between flags and gym equipment! Hooray! You may now graduate to the 1st grade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #60
73. Once more, for the slow learners in the back of the class:
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 02:02 PM by Squatch
YOU: "If the students fight and argue over the various flags, then no one wears any flags"

ME: "If students fight and argue over various gym equipment, then nobody gets to use any gym equipment."

The gym equipment is IMMATERIAL to this discussion. It was inserted to point out how absolutely DAFT your argument is. It was used to show, that if somebody chose to use YOUR argument, it's easy to apply it to anything which caused any sort of conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #54
87. You may surprised to learn that the Nazi flag in this country
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 03:39 PM by Lex
is protected free speech under the 1st Amendment.

The school system was trying avoid a constitutional problem by banning all flags being worn so they could avoid the 1st Amendment problem of "preferred" political speech.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
47. You didn't explain what was stupid about the analogy.
You said flags make a political statement, and gym equipment doesn't.

That doesn't explain why the analogy is flawed, it only illustrates a difference between flags and gym equipment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. The 1st amendment applies to political speech/content and not
to non-political speech/content.

I'm sorry, I figured we all knew that by now.

And yes, wearing a certain flag is political speech.

And no, gym equipment choice is not.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. You're kidding, right?
"The 1st amendment applies to political speech/content and not to non-political speech/content."

"...or abridging the freedom of speech..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. Okay, you try to make a constitutional argument for gym equipment
and how the 1st Amendment applies to it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. I wear a shirt saying "I like Nautilus brand gym equipment"
Some guy forces me to not wear that T-shirt. I take him to court citing my first amendment right to say I like Nautilus brand gym equipment.

Next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. "Some guy" is not the government of the US
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 01:56 PM by Lex
or by extension, the school system.

The 1st Amendment applies to governmental interference with political speech.

Wow. Sorry I thought you understood that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. I understand that you're flat out wrong.
"The 1st Amendment applies to governmental interference with political speech."

So you're saying the government can ban non-political speech?

:rofl:

Jesus, what a sad state of affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #70
74. "So you're saying the government can ban non-political speech?"

Okay, now I'm just going to assume you are intentionally being clueless.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Hey, it's pretty much a direct quote.
"The 1st amendment applies to political speech/content and not to non-political speech/content.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #75
78. The political content of the t-shirts means it is a 1st amendment issue
and is protected under the 1st Amendment.

"Some guy" making you take off your nautilus t-shirt is not political speech and is not protected under the 1st Amendment.

That is all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. ROFLMAO
You get an F for 7th grade social studies today.

"The 1st amendment applies to political speech/content and not to non-political speech/content."

The 1st amendment applies to all speech.

"And yes, wearing a certain flag is political speech."

So now you're saying the 1st amendment protects the right to wear flags from foriegn countries? :rofl:

"And no, gym equipment choice is not."

No shit, Watson, what's your point?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. "So now you're saying the 1st amendment protects the right to wear flags from foriegn countries?"

Absolutely yes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #58
85. Doesn't matter.
The school decided to ban the first amendment too. No point in allowing the constitution in the classroom.

And you sure as hell better not be wearing clothing with the constitution printed on it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
76. Here's more common sense
If there are bigots causing discipline problems, discipline the bigots.

Why would the school think that not allowing flags on shirts would solve this problem anyway? Like nationalist bigots are going to say, "Oh well you're still from another country but you aren't wearing their flag anymore, so I'll leave you alone now. Have a nice day."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dollface Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why is any country's flag banned in the first place? Seems it would improve geography scores.
From the article. "The superintendent of schools in Sampson County calls the situation unfortunate, but says educators didn’t want to be forced to pick and choose which flags should be permissible.

Personally I don't care for flag clothing but I'm a liberal so I don't go around trying ban things just because I find them to be in bad taste. ALthough I guess if someone showed up sporting an Iraqi flag t-shirt it might cause the students to react and possibly offer an opportunity for an open exchange of ideas. Can't be having that now can we.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I wonder if they ban non-country flags
like this one:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
80. Knowing the locale, I'd bet it's because of conflicts between those
who are immigrants wearing the Mexican flag and those who are morons wearing the Confederate flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Were confederate flags allowed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. There have been problems with the wearing of that flag too.

Solution: no one wears a flag on their clothes.

Easy enough.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Good, I take it that the U.S. Flag is allowed at the front of each classroom
...or at least in the public areas of the school?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Students can't WEAR any flags
it doesn't say the US flag is banned at the school altogether.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dollface Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Do gangs have flags?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is the kind of PC assclownery that makes "progressives" look stupid
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. You think people in charge at that school are "progressives?"

LOL at you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. If not over-the-top progressives they are spineless wimps
Underserving of the responsibility of providing role models for young people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Sounds like the work of conservatives to me.
Real cro-magnon conservatives.

The sort of people who are way too into dress codes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. A significant portion of the names on the school's faculty list look Cherokee
Check it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. I see two people with the last name "barefoot."
Jesus fucking Christ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #41
56. native american origins
most probably

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Yeah, and maybe Ellis Herring the custodian is a fish.
Regardless, what's your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #59
66. Umm
are you normally this obtuse?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. Are you?
I claimed that this is probably a case of conservatism run amok, and you pointed out that a couple of people on the faculty have last names that may or may not be Native American.

What the fuck is your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #59
82. Yes, probably a "Red" Herring at that
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 02:53 PM by slackmaster
So much for conservatives running the school district.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. My guess for the whole start of this commotion....
based on my observations of posts on the same topic at FR is that someone came to school wearing the shirt of another county and got this response:

"Hey. You're in America now. Take that foreign shirt offa your stinking back and wear our flag or get out of this country."

Instead of sticking up for the student wearing the "offending" shirt the school board wimped out and decided to ban any flag related material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Yes, that is the most likely scenario.
Believe me, I know this area of the state. It is the reddest of red.

Some kid probably tried to wear a French flag or something and got harassed or beaten up.

From the article: "The new rule stems from a controversy over students wearing shirts bearing flags of other countries."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. There would be nothing wrong with a policy that allowed US flags only
Banning US flags is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Banning the WEARING of the US flag as a clothing item --

US Flags are not banned entirely at the school.

I get sick of seeing the flag treated as crap clothes from China anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. There'd be nothing wrong with a policy that allowed US flags only?
Of course there is. That's unadulterated nationalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Zee school vill haf nozing but US flags on zee clothes!
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 01:32 PM by Lex

See, what could be wrong with that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. They display the US flag on the flag pole in front of the school
And not that of any other country. Why not apply the same to student attire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Why not? Because that would be stupid?
Say some kid wants to were a Mexican flag pin on his shirt. What's a good reason why he shouldn't be able to. Because this is America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Freedom of expression is limited in school
There are a lot of things you can't wear, say, or do in class. The US flag should not be one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Huh?
Freedom of expression is limited in school, therefore flags from other countries should be banned?

Does that make sense to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #43
53. Yes, if it's causing discipline problems it makes perfect sense
Just as wearing gang colors, bare midriffs, baggy pants, etc. can be banned if they are causing discipline problems.

Banning the US flag just to be "fair" to other countries makes no sense to me at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #53
63. If it's causing discipline problems...
then the faculty needs to crack down on the bigots causing problems with kids wearing flags.

Banning flags, or say, the color blue, doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

It's just plain stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #32
44. Uh...because it's illegal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #44
83. Because WHAT is illegal?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. No...students harassing other students because they are wearing flags from other countries is
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 01:33 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
ridiculous. Banning the wearing of flags from other countries to alleviate the problem would be one of the most pathetic, narrow-minded things the school could do, and would somehow push the level of "ridiculous" straight off the edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. Actually, there would be quite a bit wrong with that policy.
And that School Board knows that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. The policy the Board has adopted is going to cause them a heap of trouble
If their motivation is risk avoidance, they're doing a terrible job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. Absolutely it's a terrible decision. However banning all flags except the US flag would be a
terrible decision also. Ideally, they needed to deal with the problem, instead of using a blanket solution to avoid the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Banning foriegn flags IS the stupid decision.
Banning U.S. flags is the ridiculous yet logical extension of the original stupid idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #38
50. I'll agree with that second statement, wholeheartedly.
And I can only HOPE that the first one is true as well.

If they had a few troublemaking students causing problems
related to foreign-flag-shirts, they should have disciplined
those students and taught them the error of their ways.

Instead, they've effectively enforced those students' opinions
upon the entire student body. That's just about as EXACTLY wrong
as can be IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
36. This is so stupid - on so many levels.
Schools exist to teach children. If there's a problem with students wearing flags - find out WHY there's a problem & teach the the facts to alliviate the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. I agree.
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
46. And kids can't wear flags from other countries because . . . ?
That doesn't make sense. Why should it bother anyone if they wear a flag from the US or any country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. Because if God had wanted people to come from other countries
...He wouldn't have made Jesus an American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #46
55. Apparently, it riles up the FReeper-spawn, who then cause trouble.
And that district would rather pass new rules against the shirt-wearers
than enforce existing rules against the Freeper-spawn who were making trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #55
71. Exactly.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #46
62. It would be interesting to know what the offending flag(s) was/were
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 01:52 PM by Mike Daniels
As it would possibly allow for some insight into a potentially deeper problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
67. Who wants to bet that this will be the lead story on every FOX News program this evening
This is the typical red meat that Bill and Sean love to throw to their viewers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. BillO will undoubtedly be on fire about it, with the wrong facts
and background, as usual.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #69
77. I'm predicting that this will be the script for Bill's coverage
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 02:13 PM by Mike Daniels
1. Lead in with over the top outrage and be as inflamatory as possible

2. Go to his point/"counterpoint" duo of Michelle Malkin and Kristin Powers.

3. Malkin gets all hot and bothered over the fact that the US flag can't be worn instead of wondering what actions set off the policy to begin with.

4. Kristen Powers rolls over as always and meekly makes some sort of argument about some minor point while basically acknowledging that Bill's manly display of scorn for the county school board is 100% justified.

5. Bill then makes some smirking comment of how "representatives of blah, blah, blah were contacted and invited to participate but they either didn't return his call or responded with "no comment".

6. Bill cuts to commerical and he, Malkin and Powers all massage the others' egos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
79. But being Sampson County NC, you can bet
they still have their Dixie Outfitter t-shirts and book bags and shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
81. Isn't NC the first new National ID card with the North American Union on it?
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
84. i'd be far more offended had the decision been to allow only US flags
this seems like an even handed decision, and one that is of course being portrayed completely wrong by the republican-owned corporate media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. Even handed approach but the least desirable even-handed option
Ideally, the school board should have said that people are free to wear clothing that displays the flag of any nation and then taken any troublemakers to task.

This is basically the school board just wimping out in order to avoid making a stand on general principle. And, in the end, they still haven't made anyone really happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
88. I smell lawsuit...
And it's a case this district is all but guaranteed to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
89. I like it. Flags kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC